Evaluation of a Functional Position for Lateral Radiograph Acquisition in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design. A retrospective examination of lateral spine radiographs of 50 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was performed to evaluate the sagittal profile of patients in two different standing positions. Objectives. To evaluate segmental and global changes in the sagittal profile of the spine associated with two standing radiographic positions and determine if one position represents a more functional stance for accurate sagittal balance evaluation. Summary of Background Data. Studies of spinal sagittal balance during relaxed standing have indicated that the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), as determine by the horizontal displacement of a C7 plumb line from the posterior superior corner of the sacrum, is neutral or slightly positive. However, standing with the arms forward flexed to allow radiographic visualization of the spine results in a negative shift in SVA. Methods. Measurements were obtained from standing lateral radiographs in patients with AIS in two different standing positions: arms forward flexed to 45° with elbows fully extended versus elbows fully flexed with fists resting on clavicles. Sagittal plane parameters were analyzed using correlation analyses and repeated-measures analyses of variance with significance set at 0.005. Results. The study cohort included 25 patients who had undergone solely nonoperative treatment (without progression) and 25 patients who had undergone operative intervention for their scoliosis. In all patients, SVA was more negative (C7 shifted more posterior with respect to the sacrum) when the arms were in the forward flexed position compared to the fists on clavicles position (−4.2 ± 2.5 cm vs. −1.3 ± 2.4 cm, P < 0.001). In operative patients, the shoulder forward flexed position was associated with relative posterior rotation of the pelvis represented by an average increase of 2.7 ± 3.8° in pelvic tilt (P = 0.002) and an average decrease of 3.2 ± 4.5° in sacral slope (P = 0.002). There was no correlation between the degree of arm forward flexion and changes in sagittal measures between the two positions. Conclusions. The fists on clavicles position for lateral radiograph acquisition has less negative shift in SVA, and in patients with spinal instrumentation, less compensatory posterior rotation of the pelvis. This position is more representative of a patient’s functional balance while still allowing adequate lateral radiographic visualization of the spine.

[1]  R. Jackson,et al.  Compensatory Spinopelvic Balance Over the Hip Axis and Better Reliability in Measuring Lordosis to the Pelvic Radius on Standing Lateral Radiographs of Adult Volunteers and Patients , 1998, Spine.

[2]  C. Schmidt,et al.  A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: The conditions required for an economic standing position , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  R. Jackson,et al.  Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. , 2000, Spine.

[4]  S. Koop,et al.  Determination of “Normal” Thoracic Kyphosis: A Roentgenographic Study of 121 “Normal” Children , 2000, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[5]  L. Lenke,et al.  The Effect of Variation in Arm Position on Sagittal Spinal Alignment , 2000, Spine.

[6]  R. Jackson,et al.  Radiographic Analysis of Sagittal Plane Alignment and Balance in Standing Volunteers and Patients with Low Back Pain Matched for Age, Sex, and Size: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study , 1994, Spine.

[7]  I. Kingma,et al.  Accuracy of the sagittal vertical axis in a standing lateral radiograph as a measurement of balance in spinal deformities , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[8]  P. Newton,et al.  Standing Lateral Radiographic Positioning Does Not Represent Customary Standing Balance , 2003, Spine.

[9]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Radiologic findings and curve progression 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of brace and surgical treatment with matching control group of straight individuals. , 2001, Spine.

[10]  C H Rivard,et al.  A noninvasive anthropometric technique for measuring kyphosis and lordosis: an application for idiopathic scoliosis. , 2000, Spine.

[11]  B. Boisaubert,et al.  The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants, and spondylolisthesis patients , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[12]  R. Jackson,et al.  Pelvic Lordosis and Alignment in Spondylolisthesis , 2003, Spine.

[13]  L. Lenke,et al.  Comparison of Standing Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adolescents and Adults , 1998, Spine.

[14]  R. Jackson,et al.  Congruent Spinopelvic Alignment on Standing Lateral Radiographs of Adult Volunteers , 2000, Spine.

[15]  Kevin W. McEnery,et al.  An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment in 100 Asymptomatic Middle and Older Aged Volunteers , 1995, Spine.