Sonar Detection and Classification of Underwater UXO and Environmental Parameters

Abstract : This report summarizes an effort carried out at the Naval Surface Warfare Center--Panama City Division (NSWC PCD) under SERDP funding to work towards resolving issues that affect sonar detection and classification/identification (C/ID) of underwater UXO using sonar. We leveraged on-going Navy sponsored sonar tests to collect data to further the model development and validation needed to keep sonar models and simulations such as PC SWAT and the more recent finite-element-based models up to date for UXO applications. This modeling capability and test data was then used both to build a database of sonar target signals useful for developing and evaluating C/ID algorithms that separate UXO from bottom clutter and to look for and understand target signatures that appear sufficiently unique for classification. While traditional C/ID based on target imaging remains an important tool, it is likely to be insufficient for small and/or buried UXO. Processing sonar target responses onto non-imaging spaces was investigated as a means to find physics-motivated clues like elastic wave signatures that don't require high resolution to provide high classification confidence. Classification analyses performed on target acoustic data collected in NSWC PCD's freshwater pond demonstrated the feasibility of class separating different targets using features derived from non-image representations of the target. Unlike image-based classification, this methodology was even shown capable of discriminating between targets of the same size and shape but different material composition.

[1]  Steven G Kargl,et al.  Acoustic response of unexploded ordnance (UXO) and cylindrical targets , 2010, OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE.

[2]  Lisa Symons,et al.  The Use of the RUST Database to Inventory, Monitor, and Assess Risk from Undersea Threats , 2009 .

[3]  Kevin L. Williams,et al.  Bistatic Synthetic Aperture Sonar Measurements and Preliminary Analysis , 2006 .

[4]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Measurements and modeling of acoustic scattering from partially and completely buried spherical shells. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Andrew Schwartz,et al.  An Overview of Underwater Technologies for Operations Involving Underwater Munitions , 2009 .

[6]  Raymond Lim,et al.  Acoustic scattering from underwater munitions near a water‐sediment interface. , 2011 .

[7]  E. Thorsos,et al.  Monostatic and bistatic measurements of targets resting on or buried under the seafloor. , 2009 .

[8]  Brij Lal,et al.  A textbook of sound , 1995 .

[9]  Mehrdad Soumekh,et al.  Synthetic Aperture Radar Signal Processing with MATLAB Algorithms , 1999 .

[10]  Williams,et al.  Acoustic scattering by a three-dimensional elastic object near a rough surface , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Terrance P Long A Global Prospective on Underwater Munitions , 2009 .

[12]  Mario Zampolli,et al.  Acoustic scattering from a solid aluminum cylinder in contact with a sand sediment: measurements, modeling, and interpretation. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Philip L Marston,et al.  Leaky helical flexural wave backscattering contributions from tilted cylindrical shells in water: observations and modeling. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  R. Lim,et al.  Buried Sphere Detection Using a Synthetic Aperture Sonar , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[15]  Alessandra Tesei,et al.  Computing the far field scattered or radiated by objects inside layered fluid media using approximate Green's functions. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.