An Investigation into the FertilizerParticle Dynamics Off-the-Disc

Abstract. The particle size range specifications for two biosolids-derived organomineral fertilizers (OMF) known as OMF 10 (10:4:4) and OMF 15 (15:4:4) were established. Such specifications will enable field application of OMF with spinning disc systems using conventional tramlines spacing. A theoretical model was developed, which predicts the trajectory of individual fertilizer particles off-the-disc. The drag coefficient (C d ) was estimated for small time steps (10 -6 s) in the trajectory of the particle as a function of the Reynolds number. For the range of initial velocities (20 to 40 m s -1 ), release angles (0° to 10°) and particle densities (1000 to 2000 kg m -3 ) investigated, the analysis showed that OMF 10 and OMF 15 need to have particle diameters between 1.10 and 5.80 mm, and between 1.05 and 5.50 mm, respectively, to provide similar spreading performance to urea with particle size range of 1.00 to 5.25 mm in diameter. OMF 10 and OMF 15 should have 80% (by weight) of particles between 2.65 and 4.30 mm, and between 2.55 and 4.10 mm, respectively. Due to the physical properties of the material, disc designs and settings that enable working at a specified bout width by providing a small upward particle trajectory angle (e.g., 10°) are preferred to high rotational velocities. However, field application of OMF with spinning discs applicators may be restricted to tramlines spaced at a maximum of 24 m; particularly, when some degree of overlapping is required between two adjacent bouts. The performance of granular fertilizers can be predicted based on properties of the material, such as particle density and size range, using the contour plots developed in this study.

[1]  Spatial variability of n fertilizer application and wheat yield , 1990, Fertilizer research.

[2]  R. Godwin,et al.  Nitrogen Release Characteristics from Biosolids-Derived Organomineral Fertilizers , 2014 .

[3]  Floyd M. Cunningham,et al.  Design Relationships for Centrifugal Fertilizer Distributors , 1967 .

[4]  Jan Willem Hofstee,et al.  Handling and spreading of fertilizers: Part 2, physical properties of fertilizer, measuring methods and data , 1992 .

[5]  R. E. Pitt,et al.  Approximating Equations for Rotary Distributor Spread Patterns , 1982 .

[6]  J. Pesek,et al.  Inefficiency of Fertilizer Use Resulting from Nonuniform Spatial Distribution: II. Yield Losses Under Selected Distribution Patterns 1 , 1962 .

[7]  Jan Willem Hofstee,et al.  Handling and spreading of fertilizers part 1: Physical properties of fertilizer in relation to particle motion , 1990 .

[8]  Diogenes L. Antille,et al.  Effects of Biosolids-Derived Organomineral Fertilizers, Urea, and Biosolids Granules on Crop and Soil Established with Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) , 2014 .

[9]  Diogenes L. Antille,et al.  Field-Scale Evaluation of Biosolids-Derived Organomineral Fertilisers Applied to Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) in England , 2013 .

[10]  H. T. Søgaard,et al.  Yield Reduction Resulting from Uneven Fertilizer Distribution , 1994 .

[11]  M. Bradley,et al.  Segregation of Blended Fertiliser During Spreading: The Effect of Differences in Ballistic Properties , 2005 .

[12]  Tony E Grift,et al.  Measurement of velocity and diameter of individual fertilizer particles by an optical method. , 1997 .

[13]  Jan Willem Hofstee,et al.  Physical properties of fertilizer in relation to handling and spreading , 1993 .

[14]  J. Pesek,et al.  Inefficiency of Fertilizer Use Resulting from Nonuniform Spatial Distribution: III. Fractional Segregation in Fertilizer Materials 1 , 1962 .

[15]  Diogenes L. Antille,et al.  Soil Displacement and Soil Bulk Density Changes as Affected by Tire Size , 2013 .

[16]  J. De Baerdemaeker,et al.  Calculation of fertilizer distribution patterns from a spinning disc spreader by means of a simulation model , 1996 .

[17]  Tony E Grift,et al.  Testing an Online Spread Pattern Determination Sensor on a Broadcast Fertilizer Spreader , 2002 .

[18]  G. Hoffmeister,et al.  Fertilizer Consistency, Bulk Blending of Fertilizer Material: Effect of Size, Shape, and Density on Segregation , 1964 .

[19]  R. Godwin,et al.  Phosphorus Release Characteristics from Biosolids-Derived Organomineral Fertilizers , 2014 .

[21]  Tony E Grift,et al.  Determining Effects of Fertilizer Particle Shape on Aerodynamic Properties , 1997 .

[22]  O. Miserquea,et al.  Segregation of the bulk blend fertilizers , 2004 .

[23]  Tony E Grift,et al.  Aerodynamic properties of individual fertilizer particles , 1997 .

[24]  Diogenes L. Antille,et al.  Characterisation of organomineral fertilisers derived from nutrient-enriched biosolids granules , 2013 .

[25]  Ian J. Yule,et al.  Technical Note: Modeling of Fertilizer Distribution Using Measured Machine Parameters , 2007 .

[26]  Herman Ramon,et al.  Model for Simulation of Particle Flow on a Centrifugal Fertiliser Spreader , 2004 .

[27]  Daniel K Mullenix,et al.  Case Study: Distribution Uniformity of a Blended Fertilizer Applied Using a Variable-Rate Spinner-Disc Spreader , 2013 .

[28]  Carl Wassgren,et al.  Granular Fertiliser Particle Dynamics on and off a Spinner Spreader , 2003 .

[29]  J. W. Hofstee Handling and spreading of fertilizers: Part 3, Measurement of particle velocities and directions with ultrasonic transducers, theory, measurement system, and experimental arrangements. , 1994 .

[30]  Jan Willem Hofstee,et al.  Handling and Spreading of Fertilizers: Part 5, The Spinning Disc Type Fertilizer Spreader , 1995 .

[31]  Charles E. Rice,et al.  Distribution of Granular Fertilizer and Wheat Seed by Centrifugal Distributors , 1973 .

[32]  John P. Fulton,et al.  Distribution Pattern Variability of Granular VRT Applicators , 2005 .

[33]  Travis P. Hignett Physical and Chemical Properties of Fertilizers and Methods for their Determination , 1985 .

[34]  B. Hounsome,et al.  The British survey of fertiliser practice. Fertiliser use on farm crops for crop year 2000. , 1997 .