Interaction-Dominant Causation in Mind and Brain, and Its Implication for Questions of Generalization and Replication

The dominant assumption about the causal architecture of the mind is, that it is composed of a stable set of components that contribute independently to relevant observables that are employed to measure cognitive activity. This view has been called component-dominant dynamics. An alternative has been proposed, according to which the different components are not independent, but fundamentally interdependent, and are not stable basic properties of the mind, but rather an emergent feature of the mind given a particular task context. This view has been called interaction-dominant dynamics. In this paper, we review evidence for interaction-dominant dynamics as the causal architecture of the mind. We point out, that such an architecture is consistent with problems of convergence in research on the level of results and theorizing. Moreover, we point out that if interaction-dominant dynamics as the causal architecture of the mind were to be true, this would naturally lead to (some degree of) problems with generalization and replicability in sciences of the mind and brain, and would probably warrant changes in the scientific practice with regard to study-design and data analysis.

[1]  D L Gilden,et al.  1/f noise in human cognition. , 1995, Science.

[2]  Sebastian Wallot.  From “cracking the orthographic code” to “playing with language”: toward a usage-based foundation of the reading process , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[3]  The Impact of Interpersonal Discrimination and Stress on Health and Performance for Early Career STEM Academicians , 2016, Frontiers in psychology.

[4]  Richard J. Brown.  Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[5]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works , 1996 .

[6]  Beatrix Vereijken,et al.  Interaction-dominant dynamics in human cognition: beyond 1/f(alpha) fluctuation. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality , 1998 .

[8]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997, Complex.

[9]  J. Paton,et al.  An Exploration of the Control of Micturition Using a Novel in Situ Arterially Perfused Rat Preparation , 2011, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[10]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  A Tutorial on Multifractality, Cascades, and Interactivity for Empirical Time Series in Ecological Science , 2013 .

[11]  Michael J Richardson,et al.  Cue predictability changes scaling in eye-movement fluctuations , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[12]  J. Sullivan.  Stabilizing Constructs through Collaboration across Different Research Fields as a Way to Foster the Integrative Approach of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  B. Vereijken,et al.  Beyond 1 / f α fluctuation-1 Interaction-dominant dynamics in human cognition : Beyond 1 / f α fluctuation , 2010 .

[14]  C L Webber,et al.  Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  C. Kello,et al.  Spatial memory in foraging games , 2016, Cognition.

[16]  Charles A. Coey,et al.  Power-law fluctuations in eye movements predict text comprehension during connected text reading , 2015, CogSci.

[17]  Sebastian Wallot,et al.  Silent Reading Fluency and Comprehension in Bilingual Children , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[18]  G. V. van Orden,et al.  Self-organization of cognitive performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean? , 2015, The American psychologist.

[20]  Nicole S. Carver,et al.  Multifractality in individual honeybee behavior hints at colony-specific social cascades: Reanalysis of radio-frequency identification data from five different colonies. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[21]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Detecting and predicting changes , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Guido Strunk,et al.  The identification of critical fluctuations and phase transitions in short term and coarse-grained time series—a method for the real-time monitoring of human change processes , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[24]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Self-organized criticality , 1999 .

[25]  Heidi Kloos,et al.  The role of reading time complexity and reading speed in text comprehension. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[27]  Damian G. Stephen,et al.  The dynamics of insight: Mathematical discovery as a phase transition , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Damian G. Stephen,et al.  Scaling in executive control reflects multiplicative multifractal cascade dynamics , 2012 .

[29]  F. Donders.  On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[30]  H. Simon,et al.  The Organization of Complex Systems , 1977 .

[31]  Damian G. Kelty-Stephen,et al.  Nesting of Focal Within Peripheral Vision Promotes Interactions Across Nested Time Scales in Head Sway: Multifractal Evidence From Accelerometry During Manual and Walking-Based Fitts Tasks , 2015 .

[32]  Claudia Carello,et al.  Cognition: The view from ecological realism , 1981, Cognition.

[33]  C. B. Colby.  The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[34]  Sandy Lovie.  How the mind works , 1980, Nature.

[35]  Heidi Kloos,et al.  Voluntary behavior in cognitive and motor tasks , 2010 .

[36]  F. Hasselman,et al.  An interaction-dominant perspective on reading fluency and dyslexia , 2012, Annals of dyslexia.

[37]  G. Orden,et al.  LIVING IN THE PINK: INTENTIONALITY, WELLBEING, AND COMPLEXITY , 2011 .

[38]  J. Marshall,et al.  Patterns of paralexia: a psycholinguistic approach. , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[40]  Damian G. Kelty-Stephen,et al.  Non-visually-guided distance perception depends on matching torso fluctuations between training and test , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Damian G. Kelty-Stephen,et al.  Interwoven fluctuations during intermodal perception: fractality in head sway supports the use of visual feedback in haptic perceptual judgments by manual wielding. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  A. Opstal.  Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[43]  I. Lakatos.  Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[44]  Biyu J. He.  Scale-Free Properties of the Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal during Rest and Task , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  The Module Mistake , 2003, Cortex.

[46]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Human cognition and a pile of sand: a discussion on serial correlations and self-organized criticality. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[48]  Damian G. Stephen,et al.  Scaling in cognitive performance reflects multiplicative multifractal cascade dynamics , 2012, Front. Physio..

[49]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  What do double dissociations prove? , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[50]  James A. Dixon,et al.  The scaling behavior of hand motions reveals self-organization during an executive function task , 2011 .

[51]  C. Granger,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO LONG‐MEMORY TIME SERIES MODELS AND FRACTIONAL DIFFERENCING , 1980 .

[52]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimation and interpretation of 1/fα noise in human cognition , 2004 .

[54]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[55]  J. Sullivan.  Construct Stabilization and the Unity of the Mind-Brain Sciences , 2016, Philosophy of Science.

[56]  Kenneth R. Paap,et al.  Functional Neuroimages Fail to Discover Pieces of Mind in the Parts of the Brain , 1997, Philosophy of Science.

[57]  Sebastian Wallot,et al.  Effects of Accuracy Feedback on Fractal Characteristics of Time Estimation , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[58]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[59]  John G Holden,et al.  Fractal 1/ƒ dynamics suggest entanglement of measurement and human performance. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  Heidi Kloos,et al.  Using Complexity Metrics to Assess Silent Reading Fluency: A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing Oral and Silent Reading , 2014 .

[61]  Joshua Correll,et al.  1/f noise and effort on implicit measures of bias. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  Damian G. Kelty-Stephen,et al.  Expectations on Hierarchical Scales of Discourse: Multifractality Predicts Both Short- and Long-Range Effects of Violating Gender Expectations in Text Reading , 2018 .

[63]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Interdependence of Saccadic and Fixational Fluctuations , 2015 .