Interorganisational networks and proximity: an analysis of R&D networks for cultural goods

Purpose of the paper : The aim of this study is to measure the impact of various dimensions of proximity to form innovation networks. Methodology : We use a novel statistical methodology for modelling networks based on a well-studied class of models called exponential-family random graph models. Findings : Results underline the importance of various forms of proximity in the formation of innovation networks and the potential of the novel methodology to study large and complex networks in innovation studies and R&D management. Research limits : The research is mainly quantitative and contributes to the debate measuring the role and importance of various forms of proximity in innovation networks. Further analysis of how firms choose their partners is needed. Moreover, the analysis should be expanded to other contexts and industries in order to be able to generalise results. Practical implications : The work points out managerial implications in innovation studies and R&D management in order to guide firms when choosing their partners and forming a network. Originality of the paper : The study contributes to the debate on innovation network literature and tests a novel methodology to analyse large and complex inter-organisational networks.

[1]  M. Sciarelli,et al.  La social network analysis per lo studio dell’innovazione nelle reti di imprese , 2014 .

[2]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Testing Multitheoretical, Multilevel Hypotheses About Organizational Networks: An Analytic Framework and Empirical Example , 2006 .

[3]  H. Lundberg,et al.  The impact of geographical proximity and technology on firms’ RaD-operations , 2006 .

[4]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[6]  B. Nooteboom Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[7]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interorganizational relationships and networks: An overview , 2003 .

[8]  R. Boschma Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[9]  G. Dagnino,et al.  Interorganizational network and innovation: a bibliometric study and proposed research agenda , 2015 .

[10]  E. Rullani Territori in transizione: nuove reti e nuove identità per le economie e le società locali , 2013 .

[11]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 2014 .

[12]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Distretti industriali e distretti tecnologici. Modelli possibili per il Mezzogiorno. , 2003 .

[13]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[14]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Organizing innovation: Complementarities between cross-functional teams , 2009 .

[15]  L. Dezi,et al.  Competitività dei cluster europei e localizzazione dell’attività brevettuale: un’indagine empirica , 2011 .

[16]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms , 2009 .

[17]  Geoffrey G. Bell Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness , 2005 .

[18]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management , 2013 .

[19]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[20]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .

[21]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks of Innovators , 2006 .

[22]  Strategia reti di imprese e capacità relazionali , 2004 .

[23]  Cristina Boari,et al.  The Importance of Proximity for the Start‐Ups' Knowledge Acquisition and Exploitation , 2011 .

[24]  F. Molina-Morales,et al.  Geographical and cognitive proximity effects on innovation performance in SMEs: a way through knowledge acquisition , 2011, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal.

[25]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage , 2004 .

[26]  Elisa Giuliani,et al.  Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile , 2013 .

[27]  A. Torre The role of proximity during long-distance collaborative projects. Temporary geographical proximity helps , 2011 .

[28]  J. Knoben,et al.  Proximity and Inter-Organizational Collaboration: A Literature Review , 2006 .

[29]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Inter-organisational collective learning: the case of biotechnology in France , 2010 .

[30]  L. Zanni,et al.  Capacità interne, relazioni esterne e performance in un cluster emergente: un’analisi empirica nel settore Life Sciences , 2012 .

[31]  Stefano Bresciani,et al.  Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe , 2016, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[32]  Elisa Giuliani,et al.  Networks of Innovation , 2011 .

[33]  A. Morrison,et al.  The Dynamics of Technical and Business Networks in Industrial Clusters: Embeddedness, status or proximity? , 2014 .

[34]  G. Gijsbers,et al.  The use of social network analysis in innovation studies: Mapping actors and technologies , 2010 .

[35]  Shlomo Maital,et al.  The Evolution of Innovation Networks and Spin-off Entrepreneurship: The Case of RAD , 2015 .

[36]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[37]  Chiara Luisa Cantu,et al.  Exploring the role of spatial relationships to transform knowledge in a business idea - Beyond a geographic proximity , 2010 .

[38]  Elena Casprini,et al.  Business model shifts: a case study on firms that apply high technology to cultural goods , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[39]  F. Xavier Molina-Morales,et al.  Formation and dissolution of inter-firm linkages in lengthy and stable networks in clusters , 2015 .

[40]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[41]  José Luis Galán,et al.  Informational networks and innovation in mature industrial clusters , 2013 .

[42]  Pierre-Alexandre Balland,et al.  Proximity and the Evolution of Collaboration Networks: Evidence from Research and Development Projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Industry , 2012 .

[43]  Soumaya Ben Letaifa,et al.  Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation , 2013 .

[44]  Martina Morris,et al.  ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[45]  Susanna Zaccarin,et al.  Modelling Multiple Interactions in Science and Technology Networks , 2013 .

[46]  Jan Hohberger,et al.  Searching for Emerging Knowledge: The Influence of Collaborative and Geographically Proximate Search , 2014 .

[47]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Partner Geographic and Organizational Proximity and the Innovative Performance of Knowledge‐Creating Alliances , 2014 .

[48]  Alessandro Muscio,et al.  Patterns of Innovation in Industrial Districts: An Empirical Analysis , 2006 .

[49]  F. Capone,et al.  R&D networks in high technology applied to cultural goods in Tuscany. A social network analysis , 2018 .

[50]  Carsten Bergenholtz,et al.  Inter-Organizational Network Studies—A Literature Review , 2011 .