Bibliometric Reports for Institutions: Best Practices in a Responsible Metrics Scenario

Carrying out bibliometric reports is one of the common tasks performed by librarians and practitioners within the framework of their professional duties. The emergence of novel data sources, the need to measure new research activities and the growing demand for fairer and more equitable evaluation within the framework of the Responsible Metrics movement has led to calls for a review of the traditional approaches to these types of reports. The main goal of this study is to outline a series of recommendations for bibliometricians, consultants and research support librarians when drafting bibliometric reports in their institutions. These best practices can significantly enhance the quality and utility of bibliometric reports, posing their practitioners as key players in the science management process.

[1]  J. Gorraiz,et al.  De Profundis: A Decade of Bibliometric Services Under Scrutiny , 2020 .

[2]  Caroline Leiß,et al.  Engaging in Performance Measurement: Introducing Bibliometric Services , 2018 .

[3]  Isabella Peters,et al.  The Leiden Manifesto under review: what libraries can learn from it , 2017, Digit. Libr. Perspect..

[4]  Juan Gorraiz,et al.  Bibliometric practices and activities at the University of Vienna , 2012 .

[5]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators , 2010 .

[6]  R. Todeschini,et al.  Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research , 2016 .

[7]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Applied Evaluative Informetrics , 2017, Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Scientific and Scholarly Communication.

[8]  Stephen J. Bensman The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  D. Moher,et al.  The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity , 2020, PLoS biology.

[10]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[11]  Laura Sbaffi,et al.  Competencies for bibliometrics , 2019, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review , 2020, El Profesional de la Información.

[14]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  General discussion of data quality challenges in social media metrics: Extensive comparison of four major altmetric data aggregators , 2018, PloS one.

[15]  Arlette Jappe Professional standards in bibliometric research evaluation? A meta-evaluation of European assessment practice 2005–2019 , 2020, PloS one.

[16]  Joel Alhuay-Quispe,et al.  Bibliometrics units as dynamic engines for universities’ scientific production , 2020 .

[17]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[18]  Thomas Heinze,et al.  Professionalization of bibliometric research assessment. Insights from the history of the Leiden Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) , 2018 .

[19]  Robyn Drummond,et al.  RIMS: The Research Impact Measurement Service at the University of New South Wales , 2009 .