A Key Role for Similarity in Vicarious Reward

A functional magnetic resonance imaging study reveals the interactions within the brain that modulate feelings of reward on seeing a similar person win a contest. Humans appear to have an inherent prosocial tendency toward one another in that we often take pleasure in seeing others succeed. This fact is almost certainly exploited by game shows, yet why watching others win elicits a pleasurable vicarious rewarding feeling in the absence of personal economic gain is unclear. One explanation is that game shows use contestants who have similarities to the viewing population, thereby kindling kin-motivated responses (for example, prosocial behavior). Using a game show–inspired paradigm, we show that the interactions between the ventral striatum and anterior cingulate cortex subserve the modulation of vicarious reward by similarity, respectively. Our results support studies showing that similarity acts as a proximate neurobiological mechanism where prosocial behavior extends to unrelated strangers.

[1]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[2]  M. Greicius,et al.  Humor Modulates the Mesolimbic Reward Centers , 2003, Neuron.

[3]  M. Schaller,et al.  Does attitude similarity serve as a heuristic cue for kinship? Evidence of an implicit cognitive association , 2005 .

[4]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others , 2006, Nature.

[5]  A. Calder,et al.  Neural mechanisms of social attention , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  N. Anderson Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Dissociable Medial Prefrontal Contributions to Judgments of Similar and Dissimilar Others , 2006, Neuron.

[8]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy , 1980 .

[9]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[10]  S. Quartz,et al.  Neural Differentiation of Expected Reward and Risk in Human Subcortical Structures , 2006, Neuron.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution , 2003, NeuroImage.

[12]  William M. Kelley,et al.  Neuroanatomical Evidence for Distinct Cognitive and Affective Components of Self , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[14]  Mark H. Davis Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[15]  Rebecca Elliott,et al.  Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task , 2006, NeuroImage.

[16]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.