Arguments and Modifiers from the Learner’s Perspective

We present a model for inducing sentential argument structure, which distinguishes arguments from optional modifiers. We use this model to study whether representing an argument/modifier distinction helps in learning argument structure, and whether a linguistically-natural argument/modifier distinction can be induced from distributional data alone. Our results provide evidence for both hypotheses.

[1]  Howard Lasnik Government–Binding Theory , 2006 .

[2]  Phil Blunsom,et al.  Inducing Tree-Substitution Grammars , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[3]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Interpolating between types and tokens by estimating power-law generators , 2005, NIPS.

[4]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Argumenthood and English Prepositional Phrase Attachment , 1999 .

[5]  Carson T. Schütze,et al.  Papers on language processing and acquisition , 1995 .

[6]  Carson T. Schütze PP attachment and argumenthood , 1995 .

[7]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[8]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Productivity and Reuse in Language , 2011, CogSci.

[9]  David Chiang,et al.  Recovering Latent Information in Treebanks , 2002, COLING.

[10]  Matt Post,et al.  Bayesian Learning of a Tree Substitution Grammar , 2009, ACL.

[11]  Vera Demberg,et al.  German and English Treebanks and Lexica for Tree-Adjoining Grammars , 2012, LREC.

[12]  Martin Kay,et al.  Syntactic Process , 1979, ACL.

[13]  David Chiang,et al.  Statistical Parsing with an Automatically-Extracted Tree Adjoining Grammar , 2000, ACL.

[14]  Treebank Penn,et al.  Linguistic Data Consortium , 1999 .

[15]  David J. Weir,et al.  D-Tree Grammars , 1995, ACL.

[16]  Yee Whye Teh,et al.  A Bayesian Interpretation of Interpolated Kneser-Ney , 2006 .

[17]  James R. Curran,et al.  Adding Noun Phrase Structure to the Penn Treebank , 2007, ACL.

[18]  Daniel Gildea,et al.  The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles , 2005, CL.