Evolution of Minimal Specificity and Promiscuity in Steroid Hormone Receptors

Most proteins are regulated by physical interactions with other molecules; some are highly specific, but others interact with many partners. Despite much speculation, we know little about how and why specificity/promiscuity evolves in natural proteins. It is widely assumed that specific proteins evolved from more promiscuous ancient forms and that most proteins' specificity has been tuned to an optimal state by selection. Here we use ancestral protein reconstruction to trace the evolutionary history of ligand recognition in the steroid hormone receptors (SRs), a family of hormone-regulated animal transcription factors. We resurrected the deepest ancestral proteins in the SR family and characterized the structure-activity relationships by which they distinguished among ligands. We found that that the most ancient split in SR evolution involved a discrete switch from an ancient receptor for aromatized estrogens—including xenobiotics—to a derived receptor that recognized non-aromatized progestagens and corticosteroids. The family's history, viewed in relation to the evolution of their ligands, suggests that SRs evolved according to a principle of minimal specificity: at each point in time, receptors evolved ligand recognition criteria that were just specific enough to parse the set of endogenous substances to which they were exposed. By studying the atomic structures of resurrected SR proteins, we found that their promiscuity evolved because the ancestral binding cavity was larger than the primary ligand and contained excess hydrogen bonding capacity, allowing adventitious recognition of larger molecules with additional functional groups. Our findings provide an historical explanation for the sensitivity of modern SRs to natural and synthetic ligands—including endocrine-disrupting drugs and pollutants—and show that knowledge of history can contribute to ligand prediction. They suggest that SR promiscuity may reflect the limited power of selection within real biological systems to discriminate between perfect and “good enough.”

[1]  W. Wickler Mimicry in plants and animals , 1969 .

[2]  R. Jensen Enzyme recruitment in evolution of new function. , 1976, Annual review of microbiology.

[3]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[4]  Didier Dubois,et al.  The principle of minimum specificity as a basis for evidential reasoning , 1986, IPMU.

[5]  K. Yamamoto,et al.  Two signals mediate hormone‐dependent nuclear localization of the glucocorticoid receptor. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[6]  M. Ryan,et al.  Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1990, Nature.

[7]  G. Jenster,et al.  The androgen receptor in LNCaP cells contains a mutation in the ligand binding domain which affects steroid binding characteristics and response to antiandrogens , 1992, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[8]  G J Kleywegt,et al.  Detection, delineation, measurement and display of cavities in macromolecular structures. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[9]  J. Katzenellenbogen,et al.  The structural pervasiveness of estrogenic activity. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  M. Nei,et al.  A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences. , 1995, Genetics.

[11]  A. Di Cosmo,et al.  Occurrence of sex steroid hormones and their binding proteins in Octopus vulgaris lam. , 1996, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[12]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[13]  D. Herschlag,et al.  Catalytic promiscuity and the evolution of new enzymatic activities. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[14]  R. Lefkowitz The superfamily of heptahelical receptors , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  Donna M. Peehl,et al.  Glucocorticoids can promote androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells through a mutated androgen receptor , 2000, Nature Medicine.

[16]  P. Sigler,et al.  Activating mineralocorticoid receptor mutation in hypertension exacerbated by pregnancy. , 2000, Science.

[17]  J. W. Thornton Evolution of vertebrate steroid receptors from an ancestral estrogen receptor by ligand exploitation and serial genome expansions , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Richard A Goldstein,et al.  Why are proteins so robust to site mutations? , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  S. Copley Enzymes with extra talents: moonlighting functions and catalytic promiscuity. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[20]  David Crews,et al.  Resurrecting the Ancestral Steroid Receptor: Ancient Origin of Estrogen Signaling , 2003, Science.

[21]  O. Gascuel,et al.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[22]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation , 2003, Proteins.

[23]  Joseph W. Thornton,et al.  Resurrecting ancient genes: experimental analysis of extinct molecules , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[25]  Vincent Laudet,et al.  Principles for modulation of the nuclear receptor superfamily , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[26]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  W. Lim,et al.  Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[28]  O. Gascuel,et al.  Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[29]  Pasch,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Evolution of Hormone-receptor Complexity by Molecular Exploitation , 2022 .

[30]  Thomas E. Ferrin,et al.  Designed divergent evolution of enzyme function , 2006, Nature.

[31]  J. W. Thornton,et al.  The Octopus vulgaris estrogen receptor is a constitutive transcriptional activator: evolutionary and functional implications. , 2006, Endocrinology.

[32]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  The roles of sensory traps in the origin, maintenance, and breakdown of mutualism , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  D. Liberles Ancestral sequence reconstruction , 2007 .

[34]  Frances H Arnold,et al.  Neutral genetic drift can aid functional protein evolution , 2007, 0705.0201.

[35]  J. W. Thornton,et al.  Evolution of a New Function by Degenerative Mutation in Cephalochordate Steroid Receptors , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[36]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Intense neutral drifts yield robust and evolvable consensus proteins. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  S. Hewitt Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: From Basic Research to Clinical Practice , 2008, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[38]  T. Mizuta,et al.  In vitro conversion of sex steroids and expression of sex steroidogenic enzyme genes in amphioxus ovary. , 2008, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology.

[39]  Narayanan Eswar,et al.  Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[40]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  In the Light of Evolution III: Two Centuries of Darwin Sackler Colloquium: In the light of directed evolution: Pathways of adaptive protein evolution , 2009 .

[41]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs , 2009, Nature.

[42]  Eric A. Ortlund,et al.  Protein Evolution by Molecular Tinkering: Diversification of the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily from a Ligand-Dependent Ancestor , 2010, PLoS biology.

[43]  S. McCormick,et al.  11-Deoxycortisol is a corticosteroid hormone in the lamprey , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  R. Mann,et al.  Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[45]  Bryan D. Kolaczkowski,et al.  Robustness of Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction to Phylogenetic Uncertainty , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[46]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Enzyme promiscuity: a mechanistic and evolutionary perspective. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[47]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .

[48]  Dan S. Tawfik Messy biology and the origins of evolutionary innovations. , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[49]  J. W. Thornton,et al.  Evolution of steroid receptors from an estrogen-sensitive ancestral receptor , 2011, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[50]  Johan A. Grahnen,et al.  Binding constraints on the evolution of enzymes and signalling proteins: the important role of negative pleiotropy , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  S. Boonen,et al.  The hinge region in androgen receptor control , 2012, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.