MEG evidence for conceptual combination but not numeral quantification in the left anterior temporal lobe during language production

The left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) has risen as a leading candidate for a brain locus of composition in language; yet the computational details of its function are unknown. Although most literature discusses it as a combinatory region in very general terms, it has also been proposed to reflect the more specific function of conceptual combination, which in the classic use of this term mainly pertains to the combination of open class words with obvious conceptual contributions. We aimed to distinguish between these two possibilities by contrasting plural nouns in contexts where they were either preceded by a color modifier (“red cups”), eliciting conceptual combination, or by a number word (“two cups”), eliciting numeral quantification but no conceptual combination. This contrast was chosen because within a production task, it allows the manipulation of composition type while keeping the physical stimulus constant: a display of two red cups can be named as “two cups” or “red cups” depending on the task instruction. These utterances were compared to productions of two-word number and color lists, intended as non-combinatory control conditions. Magnetoencephalography activity was recorded during the planning for production, prior to motion artifacts. As expected on the basis of comprehension studies, color modification elicited increased LATL activity as compared to color lists, demonstrating that this basic combinatory effect is strongly crossmodal. However, numeral quantification did not elicit a parallel effect, suggesting that the function of the LATL is (i) semantic and not syntactic (given that both color modification and numeral quantification involve syntactic composition) and (ii) corresponds more closely to the classical psychological notion of conceptual combination as opposed to a more general semantic combinatory function.

[1]  Colin Humphries,et al.  Syntactic and Semantic Modulation of Neural Activity during Auditory Sentence Comprehension , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Friederici Syntactic and semantic processes in aphasic deficits: The availability of prepositions , 1982, Brain and Language.

[3]  Billi Randall,et al.  From perception to conception: how meaningful objects are processed over time. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[5]  A. Friederici,et al.  Auditory Language Comprehension: An Event-Related fMRI Study on the Processing of Syntactic and Lexical Information , 2000, Brain and Language.

[6]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  D. Bradley,et al.  Computational distinctions of vocabulary type , 1978 .

[8]  D. Swinney,et al.  Response of anterior temporal cortex to syntactic and prosodic manipulations during sentence processing , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[9]  J. Hodges,et al.  Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organisation of semantic memory. , 1995 .

[10]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neurobiology of semantic memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  D. Osherson,et al.  An early stage of conceptual combination: Superimposition of constituent concepts in left anterolateral temporal lobe , 2010, Cognitive neuroscience.

[12]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development , 1995 .

[13]  F.-Xavier Alario,et al.  Frequency effects in noun phrase production: Implications for models of lexical access , 2002 .

[14]  Evelien Keizer,et al.  The lexical-grammatical dichotomy in Functional Discourse Grammar , 2007 .

[15]  J. Rodd,et al.  Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Parallelism in the Production of Noun Phrases: Experiments and Reaction Time Models. , 1999 .

[17]  Michael J Gardner,et al.  In Response. , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[18]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  P. Bloom,et al.  Linguistic cues in the acquisition of number words , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[20]  J. Hampton Conceptual combination , 2003 .

[21]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[22]  A. Nobre,et al.  The Response of Left Temporal Cortex to Sentences , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Meyer Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .

[24]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances , 2004, Brain and Language.

[25]  Paul Wright,et al.  Objects and Categories: Feature Statistics and Object Processing in the Ventral Stream , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Flexible Composition: Meg Evidence for the Deployment of Basic Combinatorial Linguistic Mechanisms in Response to Task Demands Flexible Composition (meg) , 2022 .

[27]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[28]  A. Syrota,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Speech , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Laura Monetta,et al.  The role of the left anterior temporal lobe in the semantic processing of famous faces , 2010, NeuroImage.

[30]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Impact of modality and linguistic complexity during reading and listening tasks , 2007, NeuroImage.

[31]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Both the Middle Temporal Gyrus and the Ventral Anterior Temporal Area Are Crucial for Multimodal Semantic Processing: Distortion-corrected fMRI Evidence for a Double Gradient of Information Convergence in the Temporal Lobes , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[33]  Linda Bebout,et al.  Processing of negative morphemes in aphasia: An example of the complexities of the closed class/open class concept , 1993 .

[34]  M. Tarr,et al.  Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Current Biology.

[35]  L. Tyler,et al.  Unitary vs multiple semantics: PET studies of word and picture processing , 2004, Brain and Language.

[36]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  Selective attention to semantic and syntactic features modulates sentence processing networks in anterior temporal cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  T. Rogers,et al.  Anterior temporal cortex and semantic memory: Reconciling findings from neuropsychology and functional imaging , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[38]  P Hagoort,et al.  A neural correlate of syntactic encoding during speech production , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[40]  Alex Clarke,et al.  The Evolution of Meaning: Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Visual Object Recognition , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[42]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Grounding the cognitive neuroscience of semantics in linguistic theory , 2011 .

[43]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  The time-course and spatial distribution of brain activity associated with sentence processing , 2012, NeuroImage.

[44]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[45]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  The role of the left anterior temporal lobe in semantic composition vs. semantic memory , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[47]  T. Rogers,et al.  Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Some linguistic structures in the speech of a Broca's aphasic. , 1972, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[49]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  J. Reznick,et al.  Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[51]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[52]  A. Damasio,et al.  A role for left temporal pole in the retrieval of words for unique entities , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[53]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[54]  Emily J. Mayberry,et al.  Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Evidence for conceptual combination in the left anterior temporal lobe , 2011, NeuroImage.

[56]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  W. Levelt Models of word production , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Syntax in Language Production: An Approach Using Tree-Adjoining Grammars , 2011 .

[59]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Basic linguistic composition recruits the left anterior temporal lobe and left angular gyrus during both listening and reading. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  Y. Adachi,et al.  Reduction of non-periodic environmental magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squares method , 2001 .

[62]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Localizing components of a complex task: sentence processing and working memory , 1998, Neuroreport.

[63]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Combination Across Domains: An MEG Investigation into the Relationship between Mathematical, Pictorial, and Linguistic Processing , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[64]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Simple Composition: A Magnetoencephalography Investigation into the Comprehension of Minimal Linguistic Phrases , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  Richard J. Binney,et al.  The ventral and inferolateral aspects of the anterior temporal lobe are crucial in semantic memory: evidence from a novel direct comparison of distortion-corrected fMRI, rTMS, and semantic dementia. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[67]  Jiang Xu,et al.  Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[68]  S. Scott,et al.  A Common System for the Comprehension and Production of Narrative Speech , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.