Catchment if you can: The effect of station entrance and exit locations on accessibility

Abstract The success of passenger railway systems depends on their ridership and thus the population they serve. A mechanism to increase ridership is to expose the existing system to more people by reconfiguring the station itself, for instance by adding extra entrance and exit gates to shorten the walking distance from a trip's origin or its final destination. Gates are key nodes giving pedestrians access from street network to boarding/alighting facilities and vice versa. Stations and platforms are places not points, passengers may spend up to 6 min a trip walking between platforms and the end of the station nearest their origin or destination. This study systematically evaluates the accessibility of train stations and the effect of constructing an additional ‘far-side’ gate at stations with a single ‘near-side’ entrance. A three-step approach is defined to generate an isochrone as the catchment area for any transport node. Results indicate that stations with a single gate along their platforms (usually on one end of them) have the potential to increase the accessibility to jobs and population by around 10% on average. Due to the walking network and land use characteristics, some stations will benefit more significantly by retrofitting a new gate. Also, four linear regression models are developed to illustrate the effect of expanded accessibility on the number of entries and exits at each station for two peak periods. Then, stations are ranked based on their added ridership, which can help authorities to prioritize the development and allocating resources.

[1]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  School site and the potential to walk to school: the impact of street connectivity and traffic exposure in school neighborhoods. , 2011, Health & place.

[2]  Kamruzzaman,et al.  Advance transit oriented development typology: case study in Brisbane, Australia , 2014 .

[3]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The Access Journey to the Railway Station and its Role in Passengers' Satisfaction with Rail Travel , 2007 .

[4]  Robert Cervero,et al.  The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Best Represent Transit Station Catchments? , 2012 .

[5]  David M Levinson,et al.  Accessibility and the choice of network investments in the London Underground , 2014 .

[6]  Alastair M. Morrison,et al.  Using desktop GIS for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Wenxin Zhang,et al.  A multimodal approach to assessing accessibility of a high-speed railway station , 2016 .

[8]  P. Rietveld,et al.  Acces to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use , 2009 .

[9]  Cláudia M. Viana,et al.  Measuring the Accessibility of Railway Stations in the Brussels Regional Express Network: a Node-Place Modeling Approach , 2018, Networks and Spatial Economics.

[10]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Urban Design to Reduce Automobile Dependence , 2006 .

[11]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Land use and public transport integration in small cities and towns: Assessment methodology and application , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[12]  Michael H. Böhlen,et al.  Defining isochrones in multimodal spatial networks , 2011, CIKM '11.

[13]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The accessibility of railway stations: the role of the bicycle in The Netherlands , 2000 .

[14]  L. Bertolini,et al.  Developing a TOD typology for Beijing metro station areas , 2016 .

[15]  David S. Vale,et al.  The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon's subway network , 2018 .