MODELING ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FROM FORESTED WATERSHEDS ACROSS THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES 1

: About 50 to 80 percent of precipitation in the southeastern United States returns to the atmosphere by evapotranspiration. As evapotranspiration is a major component in the forest water balances, accurately quantifying it is critical to predicting the effects of forest management and global change on water, sediment, and nutrient yield from forested watersheds. However, direct measurement of forest evapotranspiration on a large basin or a regional scale is not possible. The objectives of this study were to develop an empirical model to estimate long-term annual actual evapotranspiration (ART) for forested watersheds and to quantify spatial AET patterns across the southeast. A geographic information system (GIS) database including land cover, daily streamflow, and climate was developed using long term experimental and monitoring data from 39 forested watersheds across the region. Using the stepwise selection method implemented in a statistical modeling package, a long term annual AET model was constructed. The final multivariate linear model includes four independent variables—annual precipitation, watershed latitude, watershed elevation, and percentage of forest coverage. The model has an adjusted R2 of 0.794 and is sufficient to predict long term annual ART for forested watersheds across the southeastern United States. The model developed by this study may be used to examine the spatial variability of water availability, estimate annual water loss from mesoscale watersheds, and project potential water yield change due to forest cover change.

[1]  J. Gregory,et al.  Predicting Mean Annual Runoff and Suspended Sediment Yield in Rural Watersheds in North Carolina , 1997 .

[2]  E. J. Winter.  The Water Balance , 1974 .

[3]  D. Currie.  Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[4]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .

[5]  S. Durrans,et al.  A REVISED VERSION OF PnET‐II TO SIMULATE THE HYDROLOGIC CYCLE IN SOUTHEASTERN FORESTED AREAS 1 , 2002 .

[6]  M. Arthur,et al.  EFFECTS OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON FOREST STREAMWATER QUALITY IN EASTERN KENTUCKY 1 , 1998 .

[7]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Intercomparison of Methods for Calculating Potential Evaporation in Regional and Global Water Balance Models , 1996 .

[8]  S. Wullschleger,et al.  Transpiration from a multi-species deciduous forest as estimated by xylem sap flow techniques , 2001 .

[9]  C. Stöckle,et al.  Comparison of methods for applying the Priestley–Taylor equation at a regional scale , 2001 .

[10]  Dale W. Johnson,et al.  Analysis of Biogeochemical Cycling Processes in Walker Branch Watershed , 1989, Springer Advanced Texts in Life Sciences.

[11]  D. Dewalle,et al.  Trends in evaporation and Bowen Ratio on urbanizing watersheds in eastern United States , 2000 .

[12]  J. O. Rawlings,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[13]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: Possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modeling , 1998 .

[14]  G. Sun,et al.  A comparison of the watershed hydrology of coastal forested wetlands and the mountainous uplands in the Southern US , 2002 .

[15]  Lysimetric Evaluation of Pine Forest Evapotranspiration , 1985 .

[16]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[17]  R. W. Skaggs,et al.  Hydrologic Modeling of a Drained Pine Plantation on Poorly Drained Soils , 2001 .

[18]  Gary D. Bishop,et al.  Maps of regional evapotranspiration and runoff/precipitation ratios in the northeast United States , 1995 .

[19]  J. Aber,et al.  A generalized, lumped-parameter model of photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and net primary production in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems , 1992, Oecologia.

[20]  Ge Sun,et al.  MODELING THE FOREST HYDROLOGY OF WETLAND‐UPLAND ECOSYSTEMS IN FLORIDA 1 , 1998 .

[21]  H. Riekerk.  Influence of silvicultural practices on the hydrology of pine flatwoods in Florida , 1989 .

[22]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale , 2001 .

[23]  G. P. Fernandez,et al.  Hydrology of Poorly Drained Coastal Watersheds in Eastern North Carolina , 2002 .

[24]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .

[25]  G. Sun,et al.  Water budgets of two forested watersheds in South Carolina , 2000 .

[26]  Shuguang Liu.  Evapotranspiration from cypress (Taxodium ascendens) wetlands and slash pine (Pinus elliottii) uplands in north-central Florida , 1996 .

[27]  J. Szilágyi.  Modeled areal evaporation trends over the conterminous United States , 2001 .

[28]  Mik Wisniewski,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool , 1990 .

[29]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature , 1985 .

[30]  Kenneth N. Brooks,et al.  Hydrology and the Management of Watersheds , 1991 .

[31]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: sap-flow, soil water budget, eddy covariance and catchment water balance , 2001 .

[32]  K. E. Saxton,et al.  Evapotranspiration Research Priorities for Hydrology in the Next Decade , 1988 .

[33]  Evapotranspiration of Melaleuca Forest in South Florida , 1998 .