Gearing-up governance for sustainable development: Patterns of policy appraisal in UK central government

Abstract The UK is reportedly an international leader in the application of environmental policy appraisal (EPA). From the late 1980s until 2004, UK central government sought to produce ex ante assessments of the potential environmental impacts of different policy options. Critics maintain that EPA had a very limited impact on policy-making activities in Whitehall departments. However, the empirical basis for these claims is surprisingly thin. This paper seeks to better understand what facilitated or retarded EPA by looking at its use in Whitehall, with the aim being to draw lessons for the UK's new and more integrated appraisal regime, as well as similar systems in the European Union. The paper finds that the implementation of EPA was both weak and highly sectorised, and that there is an underlying resistance to policy appraisal per se in Whitehall. These weaknesses urgently need to be addressed otherwise new systems of integrated appraisal will not deliver what is expected of them.

[1]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[2]  John W. Kingdon,et al.  Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. , 1985 .

[3]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  'Greening' the European Union: What can be learned from the leaders of EU environmental policy? , 2000 .

[4]  Andrea Lenschow,et al.  Environmental policy integration : greening sectoral policies in Europe , 2002 .

[5]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[6]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Analysing Institutional Strategies for Environmental Policy Integration: The Case of EU Enterprise Policy , 2003 .

[7]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  Coordinated European Governance: Self-Organizing or Centrally Steered? , 2005 .

[8]  A. Lenschow.  New Regulatory Approaches in 'Greening' EU Policies , 2002 .

[9]  D. Pearce,et al.  Cost?Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy , 1998 .

[10]  O. Bina,et al.  New Agendas for Appraisal: Reflections on Theory, Practice, and Research , 2004 .

[11]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe , 1998 .

[12]  Pramod Kale,et al.  Sustainable development—Critical issues , 1992 .

[13]  Andrea Ross,et al.  The UK Approach to Delivering Sustainable Development in Government: A Case Study in Joined-Up Working , 2005 .

[14]  D. Helm.  The assessment: environmental policy objectives, instruments, and institutions , 1998 .

[15]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[16]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination , 1998 .

[17]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Pricing Nature: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy-Making , 2009 .

[18]  A. Jordan.  The Europeanization of British Environmental Policy , 2002 .

[19]  W. D. Hall.  Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability - Rhodes RAW , 1997 .

[20]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  Efficient hardware and light green software: Environmental policy integration in the UK , 2002 .

[21]  R. Rhodes.  Understanding governance : policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability , 1997 .

[22]  Eivind Hovden,et al.  Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework , 2003 .

[23]  N. Hanley.  Cost — Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policymaking , 2001 .