For the sake of resilience and multifunctionality, let's diversify planted forests!

As of 2020, the world has an estimated 290 million ha of planted forests and this number is continuously increasing. Of these, 131 million ha are monospecific planted forests under intensive management. Although monospecific planted forests are important in providing timber, they harbor less biodiversity and are potentially more susceptible to disturbances than natural or diverse planted forests. Here, we point out the increasing scientific evidence for increased resilience and ecosystem service provision of functionally and species diverse planted forests (hereafter referred to as diverse planted forests) compared to monospecific ones. Furthermore, we propose five concrete steps to foster the adoption of diverse planted forests: (1) improve awareness of benefits and practical options of diverse planted forests among land‐owners, managers, and investors; (2) incentivize tree species diversity in public funding of afforestation and programs to diversify current maladapted planted forests of low diversity; (3) develop new wood‐based products that can be derived from many different tree species not yet in use; (4) invest in research to assess landscape benefits of diverse planted forests for functional connectivity and resilience to global‐change threats; and (5) improve the evidence base on diverse planted forests, in particular in currently under‐represented regions, where new options could be tested.

[1]  D. Edwards,et al.  Producing wood at least cost to biodiversity: integrating Triad and sharing–sparing approaches to inform forest landscape management , 2021, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  P. Rana,et al.  Pitfalls of Tree Planting Show Why We Need People-Centered Natural Climate Solutions , 2020, BioScience.

[3]  H. Jactel,et al.  Tree Diversity and Forest Resistance to Insect Pests: Patterns, Mechanisms and Prospects. , 2020, Annual review of entomology.

[4]  P. Brancalion,et al.  Guidance for successful tree planting initiatives , 2020 .

[5]  A. Rigling,et al.  A first assessment of the impact of the extreme 2018 summer drought on Central European forests , 2020, Basic and Applied Ecology.

[6]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Research on retention forestry in Northern Europe , 2020, Ecological Processes.

[7]  B. Muys,et al.  Tree diversity is key for promoting the diversity and abundance of forest‐associated taxa in Europe , 2020, Oikos.

[8]  M. Fortin,et al.  The functional complex network approach to foster forest resilience to global changes , 2019, Forest Ecosystems.

[9]  S. Lewis,et al.  Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon , 2019, Nature.

[10]  B. Muys,et al.  Identifying the tree species compositions that maximize ecosystem functioning in European forests , 2018, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[11]  M. Kanninen,et al.  A systematic review of the socio-economic impacts of large-scale tree plantations, worldwide , 2018, Global Environmental Change.

[12]  Jingyun Fang,et al.  Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtropical forest experiment , 2018, Science.

[13]  C. Wirth,et al.  Biodiversity across trophic levels drives multifunctionality in highly diverse forests , 2018, Nature Communications.

[14]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Landscape configurational heterogeneity by small-scale agriculture, not crop diversity, maintains pollinators and plant reproduction in western Europe , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Pete Smith,et al.  Natural climate solutions , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  H. Jactel,et al.  Ecological stability of mixed-species forests , 2017 .

[17]  Julia I. Burton,et al.  Forest Restoration Using Variable Density Thinning: Lessons from Douglas-Fir Stands in Western Oregon , 2016 .

[18]  J. Bauhus,et al.  A Review of Processes Behind Diversity—Productivity Relationships in Forests , 2016, Current Forestry Reports.

[19]  H. Laudon,et al.  Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden , 2016, Ambio.

[20]  P. Meli,et al.  Combining ecological, social and technical criteria to select species for forest restoration , 2014 .

[21]  K. Williams Public acceptance of plantation forestry: Implications for policy and practice in Australian rural landscape , 2014 .

[22]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  Carbon, Fossil Fuel, and Biodiversity Mitigation With Wood and Forests , 2014 .

[23]  Y. Serengil,et al.  Managing forests as complex adaptive systems: building resilience to the challenge of global change , 2014 .

[24]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Don't judge species on their origins , 2011, Nature.

[25]  Thomas Knoke,et al.  Investment decisions under uncertainty—A methodological review on forest science studies , 2011 .

[26]  Christian Messier,et al.  The role of plantations in managing the world's forests in the Anthropocene , 2010 .

[27]  A. Tatem,et al.  Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations , 2009 .

[28]  Andrea Perlis,et al.  Global forest resources assessment 2000 : main report , 2001 .

[29]  David A. Norton,et al.  Indigenous Biodiversity Conservation and Plantation Forestry: Options for the future , 1998 .