[The effect of different lengths and placements of median laparotomy incision on wound dehiscence in the rat].

BACKGROUND To assess the effect of different lengths and placements of median laparotomy incision on wound dehiscence in the rat. METHODS Eighty female Wistar rats were divided into 8 groups of 10 rats each. Groups underwent median laparotomy with different incision lengths (2, 3, 4, 6 cm) at two sites (upper and lower abdomen). Pneumoperitoneum was established in all rats using an insufflator on postoperative day 3. When gas leakage through the wound with an instantaneous decrease in intraabdominal pressure was noticed, these values were recorded as dehiscence pressure. In addition, the time until wound breakage was recorded. The different incision groups were compared. RESULTS After excluding 4 rats for various causes, statistical analysis was performed on the remaining 76 rats. When the different incisional lengths were compared, there were no significant differences in dehiscence pressures and time (p>0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences between the incision groups according to upper or lower abdominal wall site of incision (p>0.05). CONCLUSION Midline abdominal wall incisions of different lengths and placements (upper or lower abdomen) have similar dehiscence pressures against the pneumoperitoneum in the early postoperative period (p>0.05).

[1]  A. Kwon,et al.  Effect of plasma fibronectin on the incisional wound healing in rats. , 2007, Surgery.

[2]  A. Onen,et al.  Postoperative abdominal evisceration in children: possible risk factors , 2006, Pediatric Surgery International.

[3]  J. Girones,et al.  [Risk factors for acute abdominal wall dehiscence after laparotomy in adults]. , 2005, Cirugia espanola.

[4]  William Henderson,et al.  Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy. , 2003, The Journal of surgical research.

[5]  T. Pavlidis,et al.  Complete dehiscence of the abdominal wound and incriminating factors. , 2001, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[6]  P Blomquist,et al.  Small tissue bites and wound strength: an experimental study. , 2001, Archives of surgery.

[7]  J. Waldhausen,et al.  Pediatric postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence: transverse versus vertical incisions. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  W. Schwenk,et al.  Inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections – results of a prospective randomized trial , 2000, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[9]  R. Sanz-López,et al.  Incisional hernias after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  T. Juvonen,et al.  Factors influencing wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy. , 1995, American journal of surgery.

[11]  M. Carlson,et al.  Ventral Hernia and Other Complications of 1,000 Midline Incisions , 1995, Southern medical journal.

[12]  J. Riou,et al.  Factors influencing wound dehiscence. , 1992, American journal of surgery.