Struggling with theory? A qualitative investigation of conceptual tool use in instructional design

This study employed a qualitative research design to investigate instructional designers’ views and uses of conceptual tools in design work (e.g., learning theories and design theories). While past research has examined how instructional designers spend their time, how they generally make decisions, and expert-novice differences, little attention has been paid to the value and perceptions of conceptual tools, from the perspective of practicing designers. Based on intensive interviews of practitioners, our findings included ten themes organized according to three meta-themes: (a) using theory, (b) struggling with theory, and (c) connections between theory and intuition in craftwork. While these results substantiate (to some degree) the claim that practitioners often find theory too abstract or difficult to apply, they also suggest that practitioners use theory in several important ways and tend to view theory with ambivalence rather than indifference or dislike. Other conclusions regarding the role of theory in design are provided and future directions for theorizing and research are discussed.

[1]  Stephen T. Kerr Inside the Black Box: Making Design Decisions for Instruction. , 1983 .

[2]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[3]  Charles Taylor Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Contents , 1985 .

[4]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[5]  Gordon Rowland,et al.  Designing and instructional design , 1993 .

[6]  Julius Marie Pieters,et al.  The empirical basis of designing instruction , 2008 .

[7]  Stephen C. Yanchar,et al.  Beyond the Theory-Practice Split in Instructional Design: The Current Situation and Future Directions , 2009 .

[8]  S. Cox,et al.  How do instructional design professionals spend their time? , 2003 .

[9]  M. Polanyi Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[10]  Wayne A. Nelson The Intellectual Content of Instructional Design. , 1988 .

[11]  Marcy P. Driscoll,et al.  Psychology of Learning for Instruction (3rd ed. , 2005 .

[12]  Charles M. Reigeluth Instructional Theory, Practitioner Needs, and New Directions: Some Reflections. , 1997 .

[13]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments , 1997 .

[14]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[15]  Gordon Rowland,et al.  What Do Instructional Designers Actually Do? An Initial Investigation of Expert Practice. , 2008 .

[16]  Charles Taylor,et al.  Philosophy and the human sciences , 1985 .

[17]  W. Bean Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy , 1961 .

[18]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory , 1999 .

[19]  M. Westerman Theory and Research on Practices, Theory and Research as Practices: Hermeneutics and Psychological Inquiry. , 2004 .

[20]  Allison Rossett,et al.  The theoretical and conceptual bases of instructional design , 1986 .

[21]  V. Fleming,et al.  Hermeneutic research in nursing: developing a Gadamerian-based research method. , 2003, Nursing inquiry.

[22]  Graham Badley,et al.  The theoretical and conceptual bases of instructional design , 1988 .

[23]  Richard A. Schwier,et al.  A Review of What Instructional Designers Do: Questions Answered and Questions Not Asked , 2005 .

[24]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[25]  C. Reigeluth Instructional-Design Theories and Models , 1999 .

[26]  Linda Lohr,et al.  Psychology of learning for instruction , 2005 .

[27]  R. Sternberg What Is an “Expert Student?” , 2003 .

[28]  Andrew S. Gibbons,et al.  The Architecture of Instructional Theory , 2008 .

[29]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. , 2003 .

[30]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[31]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models Volume III , 2009 .

[32]  Kent L. Gustafson,et al.  Paradigms in the theory and practice of education and training design , 2004 .

[33]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[34]  John Wedman,et al.  Instructional Designers' Decisions and Priorities: A Survey of Design Practice. , 2008 .

[35]  Russell T. Osguthorpe,et al.  How Do Instructional-Design Practitioners Make Instructional-Strategy Decisions?. , 2008 .

[36]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional Design Theories and Models : An Overview of Their Current Status , 1983 .

[37]  Ray S. Perez,et al.  Designer Thinking: How Novices and Experts Think About Instructional Design , 2008 .

[38]  Amedeo Giorgi,et al.  The Descriptive Phenomenological Psychological Method , 2012 .

[39]  Lois W. Sayrs Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[40]  R. Branch,et al.  Educational Media and Technology Yearbook , 2019, Educational Media and Technology Yearbook.