From unit-and-ten to ten-before-unit order in the history of English numerals

Abstract In the course of its history, English underwent a significant structural change in its numeral system. The number words from 21 to 99 switched from the unit-and-ten to the ten-before-unit pattern. This change is traced on the basis of more than 800 number words. It is argued that this change, which took seven centuries to complete and in which the Old English pattern was highly persistent, can be broken down into two parts—the reordering of the units and tens and the loss of the conjoining element. Although the two steps logically belong to the same overall change, they display a remarkably disparate behavior. Whereas the reordering process affected the least frequent number words first, the deletion process affected the most frequent words first. This disparity lends support to the hypothesis that the involvement or otherwise of low-level aspects of speech determines the role of frequency in language change (Phillips, 2006). Finally, the order change is likely to be a contact-induced phenomenon and may have been facilitated by a reduction in mental cost.

[1]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Language typology and language universals : an international handbook , 2001 .

[2]  Joseph Wright,et al.  Old English Grammar , 1955 .

[3]  R. Bremmer.  An Introduction to Old Frisian: History, Grammar, Reader, Glossary , 2009 .

[4]  Joan L. Bybee.  Word Frequency in Lexical Diffusion and the Source of Morphophonological Change , 2007 .

[5]  Abriss der mittelenglischen Grammatik , 1967 .

[6]  Gunnel Tottie,et al.  Lexical diffusion in syntactic change: frequency as a determinant of linguistic conservatism in the development of negation in English , 1991 .

[7]  G. Rohdenburg.  Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English , 1996 .

[8]  Dieter Kastovsky,et al.  Historical English syntax , 1991 .

[9]  Suzanne Romaine,et al.  The Cambridge history of the English language , 1992 .

[10]  D. G. MacKay.  Spoonerisms: the structure of errors in the serial order of speech. , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Hansjakob Seiler.  A dimensional view on numeral systems , 1990 .

[12]  B. Phillips.  Word Frequency and Lexical Diffusion , 2006 .

[13]  M. Jacobs.  A Middle English Syntax: Part I (Parts of Speech) , 1963 .

[14]  Laurel A. Means.  "Ffor as moche as yche man may not haue Þe astrolabe": Popular Middle English Variations on the Computus , 1992, Speculum.

[15]  O. Behaghel.  Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. , 1909, Indogermanische Forschungen.

[16]  R. M. Wilson,et al.  A Middle English Syntax. Part I, Parts of Speech , 1961 .

[17]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Studies in typology and diachrony : papers presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th birthday , 1990 .

[18]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words , 1992, Cognition.

[19]  P Langley,et al.  Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1997 .

[20]  G. Blanken,et al.  Inversion Errors in Arabic Number Reading: Is There a Nonsemantic Route? , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  Betty S. Phillips,et al.  Word Frequency and the Actuation of Sound Change , 1984 .

[22]  David Burnley,et al.  LEXIS AND SEMANTICS , 1992 .

[23]  Colette Marie-Christine Van Kerckvoorde.  An Introduction to Middle Dutch , 1992 .

[24]  Bob Duckett,et al.  The Cambridge History of the English Language , 1999 .

[25]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The Whorfian hypothesis and numerical cognition: is `twenty-four' processed in the same way as `four-and-twenty'? , 1998, Cognition.

[26]  K. Menninger.  Zahlwort und Ziffer : eine Kulturgeschichte der Zahl , 1958 .

[27]  O. Fischer.  Grammaticalisation unidirectional, non reversable? The case of to before the infinitive in English , 2000 .

[28]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Recursive Inconsistencies Are Hard to Learn: A Connectionist Perspective on Universal Word Order Correlations , 2012 .

[29]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Learning biases predict a word order universal , 2012, Cognition.

[30]  Aquinas Saint Thomas,et al.  The world order , 2006 .

[31]  Joan Bybee.  Joan Bybee: Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.

[32]  Hendrik Poutsma,et al.  A Grammar Of Late Modern English , 2008 .

[33]  J. Bosworth,et al.  An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary , 1882 .

[34]  Adolf Noreen,et al.  Altislandische Und Altnorwegische Grammatik Unter Berucksichtigung Des Urnordischen , 2009 .

[35]  M. Pagel,et al.  Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history , 2007, Nature.

[36]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .