Abstract.This is the second paper of a four-part series of papers on the development of a general framework for error analysis in measurement-based geographic information systems (MBGIS). In this paper, we discuss the problem of point-in-polygon analysis under randomness, i.e., with random measurement error (ME). It is well known that overlay is one of the most important operations in GIS, and point-in-polygon analysis is a basic class of overlay and query problems. Though it is a classic problem, it has, however, not been addressed appropriately. With ME in the location of the vertices of a polygon, the resulting random polygons may undergo complex changes, so that the point-in-polygon problem may become theoretically and practically ill-defined. That is, there is a possibility that we cannot answer whether a random point is inside a random polygon if the polygon is not simple and cannot form a region. For the point-in-triangle problem, however, such a case need not be considered since any triangle always forms an interior or region. To formulate the general point-in-polygon problem in a suitable way, a conditional probability mechanism is first introduced in order to accurately characterize the nature of the problem and establish the basis for further analysis. For the point-in-triangle problem, four quadratic forms in the joint coordinate vectors of a point and the vertices of the triangle are constructed. The probability model for the point-in-triangle problem is then established by the identification of signs of these quadratic form variables. Our basic idea for solving a general point-in-polygon (concave or convex) problem is to convert it into several point-in-triangle problems under a certain condition. By solving each point-in-triangle problem and summing the solutions, the probability model for a general point-in-polygon analysis is constructed. The simplicity of the algebra-based approach is that from using these quadratic forms, we can circumvent the complex geometrical relations between a random point and a random polygon (convex or concave) that one has to deal with in any geometric method when probability is computed. The theoretical arguments are substantiated by simulation experiments.
[1]
MAX J. EGENHOFER,et al.
Point Set Topological Relations
,
1991,
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..
[2]
Eric Haines,et al.
Point in Polygon Strategies
,
1994,
Graphics Gems.
[3]
Charles R. Ehlschlaeger,et al.
Representing multiple spatial statistics in generalized elevation uncertainty models: moving beyond the variogram
,
2002,
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..
[4]
Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.
Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling with GIS
,
1998
.
[5]
Mark de Berg,et al.
Computational geometry: algorithms and applications
,
1997
.
[6]
Agnès Voisard,et al.
Spatial Databases: With Application to GIS
,
2001
.
[7]
Darrell A. Turkington.
Matrix Calculus and Zero-One Matrices
,
2005
.
[8]
Larry E. Stanfel,et al.
Reliability of Polygonal Boundary of Land Parcel
,
1995
.
[9]
Yee Leung,et al.
Point-in-Polygon Analysis Under Certainty and Uncertainty
,
1997,
GeoInformatica.
[10]
Yee Leung,et al.
A Locational Error Model for Spatial Features
,
1998,
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..