Potential value of the PixelShine deep learning algorithm for increasing quality of 70 kVp+ASiR-V reconstruction pelvic arterial phase CT images

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of a deep learning-based denoising algorithm, PixelShine (PS), on the quality of 70 kVp pelvic arterial phase CT images.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on arterial phase pelvic CT images from 33 patients (body-mass index ≤ 20 kg/m2) obtained with a GE Revolution CT (70 kVp tube voltage; adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo-filtered back projection, 50% blending) and designated group A. Group B images were then obtained by applying PS to group A image datasets. Subjective image quality was evaluated by two radiologists with a 5-point scoring system; the scores of the groups were compared. Image signal was assessed using CT values of the urinary bladder. CT and standard deviation (SD) values of the gluteus maximus were measured, and SD values of the gluteus maximus were used to represent image noise. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the bladder were calculated. Image noise, SNR, and CNR of two groups were compared using paired t-tests.ResultsThe subjective visual image quality scores of groups A and B, respectively, were 3.11 ± 0.30 vs. 3.82 ± 0.57; image noise was 15.79 ± 2.05 Hounsfield units (HU) vs. 11.06 ± 2.22 HU; SNRs of bladder were 0.50 ± 0.23 vs. 0.79 ± 0.39; and CNRs of bladder were 3.72 ± 0.85 vs. 5.14 ± 1.27. Group B showed better subjective image quality, lower image noise, and improved SNR and CNR, compared to group A; these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The noise of group B was approximately 30% lower than that of group A; the SNR and CNR values of group B were improved by approximately 58% and 38%, respectively.ConclusionUsing 70 kVp +ASiR-V, PS can improve the image quality of pelvic arterial phase CT images, significantly reduce the image noise, and improve the SNR and CNR.

[1]  Seung-Koo Lee,et al.  Head CT: Image quality improvement with ASIR-V using a reduced radiation dose protocol for children , 2017, European Radiology.

[2]  Michael Weber,et al.  A BMI-adjusted ultra-low-dose CT angiography protocol for the peripheral arteries-Image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[3]  Makoto Iida,et al.  Visualization of simulated small vessels on computed tomography using a model-based iterative reconstruction technique , 2017, Data in brief.

[4]  O. Abe,et al.  Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[5]  Dongho Ha,et al.  Initial Phantom Study Comparing Image Quality in Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction and New Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction V , 2015, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  Julia Stehli,et al.  Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V: Impact on Image Quality in Ultralow-Dose Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography , 2016, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  Mani Vembar,et al.  Improved image quality with simultaneously reduced radiation exposure: Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithms for coronary CT angiography in a clinical setting. , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[8]  S. Schindera,et al.  Scan time adapted contrast agent injection protocols with low volume for low-tube voltage CT angiography: An in vitro study. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[9]  Naveen M. Kulkarni,et al.  Initial experience with single-source dual-energy CT abdominal angiography and comparison with single-energy CT angiography: image quality, enhancement, diagnosis and radiation dose , 2013, European Radiology.

[10]  Heejin Kwon,et al.  The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.