Unsupervised Full-Polarimetric SAR Data Segmentation as a Tool for Classification of Agricultural Areas

Versatile, robust and computational efficient methods for radar image segmentation, which preserve the full polarimetric information content, are of importance as research tools, as well as for practical applications in land surface monitoring. The method introduced here consists of several steps. The first step is a (reversible) transform of the full polarimetric radar information content into nine backscatter intensity values. The next steps relate to unsupervised clustering encompassing a simple region-growing segmentation (incomplete and over-segmented) followed by model-based agglomerative clustering and expectation-maximization on the pixels of these segments. Classification is achieved by Markov random field filtering on the original data. The result is a series of segmented maps, which differ in the number of (unsupervised) classes. For a (compatible) supervised approach, only the first and last step have to be applied. Results are discussed for the agricultural areas Flevoland in The Netherlands (AirSAR data) and DEMMIN in Germany, using the NASA/JPL AirSAR system and the DLR ESAR system, respectively. The applications include the use of groundtruth for legend development, the check for groundtruth completeness, and the construction of a bottom-up hierarchy of the characteristics that can be distinguished in the radar data. The latter gives important insights in physics of polarimetric radar backscattering mechanisms. Moreover, the relative importance of crop differences, (full-polarimetric) incidence angle effects and sub-classes (related to factors such as crop varieties, row direction or development stage) may be assessed. The overall classification results range between 84.3% and 98.0%, depending on number of observations dates and radar band(s) used, with higher values for the supervised approach, and substantially more thematic detail for the unsupervised approach.

[1]  R. Carande,et al.  The NASA/JPL Three-frequency Polarimetric Airsar System , 1992, [Proceedings] IGARSS '92 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[2]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  A review on image segmentation techniques , 1993, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[4]  Thuy Le Toan,et al.  Crop classification with multitemporal polarimetric SAR data , 2003 .

[5]  Eric Pottier,et al.  Quantitative comparison of classification capability: fully polarimetric versus dual and single-polarization SAR , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Stephen L. Durden,et al.  A three-component scattering model for polarimetric SAR data , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Dirk H. Hoekman,et al.  Land cover type and biomass classification using AirSAR data for evaluation of monitoring scenarios in the Colombian Amazon , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Thuy Le Toan,et al.  Agriculture classification using POLSAR data , 2005 .

[9]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation , 2002 .

[10]  Kun-Shan Chen,et al.  Classification of multifrequency polarimetric SAR imagery using a dynamic learning neural network , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Dirk H. Hoekman,et al.  Initialization of Markov random field clustering of large remote sensing images , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  J. J. van der Sanden,et al.  Groundtruth collection for the JPL-SAR and ERS-1 Campaign in Flevoland and the Veluwe (NL) 1991. , 1992 .

[13]  Lutgarde M. C. Buydens,et al.  Clustering multispectral images: a tutorial , 2005 .

[14]  Chris Fraley,et al.  Algorithms for Model-Based Gaussian Hierarchical Clustering , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[15]  Paolo Ferrazzoli,et al.  Experimental and model investigation on radar classification capability , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Laurent Ferro-Famil,et al.  Unsupervised classification of multifrequency and fully polarimetric SAR images based on the H/A/Alpha-Wishart classifier , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Seisuke Fukuda,et al.  A wavelet-based texture feature set applied to classification of multifrequency polarimetric SAR images , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Dirk H. Hoekman,et al.  Unsupervised Full-Polarimetric Segmentation for Evaluation of Backscatter Mechanisms of Agricultural Crops , 2007 .

[19]  Dirk H. Hoekman,et al.  A new polarimetric classification approach evaluated for agricultural crops , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[20]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[21]  Lutgarde M. C. Buydens,et al.  SMIXTURE: strategy for mixture model clustering of multivariate images , 2005 .

[22]  Eric Pottier,et al.  An entropy based classification scheme for land applications of polarimetric SAR , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  Irena Hajnsek,et al.  Exploiting longer wavelength SAR data for the improvement of surface modelling , 2008 .

[24]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Max-imum Likelihood from Incomplete Data , 1972 .

[25]  Dirk H. Hoekman,et al.  PALSAR Wide-Area Mapping of Borneo: Methodology and Map Validation , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[26]  Manabu Watanabe,et al.  ALOS PALSAR: A Pathfinder Mission for Global-Scale Monitoring of the Environment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Classification of multi-look polarimetric SAR imagery based on complex Wishart distribution , 1994 .

[28]  Henning Skriver,et al.  Multitemporal C- and L-band polarimetric signatures of crops , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  Stephen D. DeGloria,et al.  Interpretation of Landsat-4 Thematic Mapper and Multispectral Scanner data for forest surveys , 1985 .