Surface ablation efficiency and quality of fs lasers in single-pulse mode, fs lasers in burst mode, and ns lasers

Abstract In recent years, the burst-mode caught a lot of attention in the field of ultrashort-pulse laser micro machining. One of the major issues is the influence of the burst pulse number and frequency on ablation efficiency and quality. A recent publication reported of a significant increase in ablation efficiency when processing with ≥25 burst pulses at ≥100 MHz burst frequencies. This raises the question of whether processing with such high pulse densities can be attributed to non-thermal ablation, or whether a quasi-nanosecond laser ablation behavior is achieved. To answer this question, we determined ablation efficiencies as function of fluence for silicon, stainless steel, and copper and compared the ablation quality at the optimal fluence using the following laser systems: femtosecond laser operated in single-pulse mode, fs laser operated in 28-pulse-burst mode with a burst pulse frequency of 148 MHz, and a nanosecond laser with a pulse duration of 175 ns, which is identical with the temporal length of the burst pulse train. The comparison showed that the burst mode used produces similar surface morphologies and melt burrs as the nanosecond laser, but at about 2/3 of its efficiency.

[1]  Ronald Holzwarth,et al.  Ablation-cooled material removal with ultrafast bursts of pulses , 2016, Nature.

[2]  B. Neuenschwander,et al.  Optimizing the Specific Removal Rate with the Burst Mode Under Varying Conditions , 2017 .

[3]  Ralf Knappe,et al.  Scaling ablation rates for picosecond lasers using burst micromachining , 2010, LASE.

[4]  P. Tripathi,et al.  Dielectric and electro-optical properties of polymer-stabilized liquid crystal. II. Polymer PiBMA dispersed in MBBA , 2016 .

[5]  K. Sokolowski-Tinten,et al.  Ultrafast laser-induced order-disorder transitions in semiconductors. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[6]  M. Gedvilas,et al.  Use of High Repetition Rate and High Power Lasers in Microfabrication: How to Keep the Efficiency High? , 2009 .

[7]  B. Neuenschwander,et al.  Laser Micromachining of Metals with Ultra-Short Pulses : Factors Limiting the Scale-Up Process , 2017 .

[8]  J. Liu Simple technique for measurements of pulsed Gaussian-beam spot sizes. , 1982, Optics letters.

[9]  Zhibin Lin,et al.  Ultrafast laser ablation of copper with ~GHz bursts , 2018, LASE.

[10]  M. Domke Minimizing the Surface Roughness for Silicon Ablation with Ultrashort Laser Pulses , 2016 .

[11]  A. Semerok,et al.  Ultrashort double pulse laser ablation of metals , 2004 .

[12]  Beat Neuenschwander,et al.  Processing of dielectric materials and metals with PS laserpulses , 2010 .

[13]  Andreas Tünnermann,et al.  Ablation of silicon with bursts of femtosecond laser pulses , 2016, SPIE LASE.

[14]  Rudolf Weber,et al.  Shielding effects and re-deposition of material during processing of metals with bursts of ultra-short laser pulses , 2018 .

[15]  E. Mottay,et al.  High efficiency femtosecond laser ablation with gigahertz level bursts , 2019, Journal of Laser Applications.

[16]  B. Jaeggi,et al.  Burst mode with ps- and fs-pulses: Influence on the removal rate, surface quality, and heat accumulation , 2015, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[17]  Udo Loeschner,et al.  Experimental study on double-pulse laser ablation of steel upon multiple parallel-polarized ultrashort-pulse irradiations , 2016 .

[18]  A. Tünnermann,et al.  Femtosecond, picosecond and nanosecond laser ablation of solids , 1996 .