Sclerophylly: primarily protective?

The leaves of plants show an almost infinite variety of form although most leaves are essentially organs utilized for the same function, photosynthesis. Analyses of the diversity of plant leaf form have revealed the presence of one major trend in the variation, i.e. from large, relatively thin and soft leaves to small, thick and tough ones (Givnish 1987; Reich, Walters & Ellsworth 1992; Turner 1994), although there is a great deal of scatter about any regression line. The subject of this paper is the leaves at latter end of the spectrum which I will call sclerophylls, using the term in its literal, descriptive sense of 'hard leaves'. Soft leaves will be called malacophylls. The sclerophyll is the predominant leaf form in vegetation occurring over a wide geographic and climatic range. This has been recognized for at least the last century (Seddon 1974) but the functional significance of sclerophylly remains controversial (Cody & Mooney 1978; Grubb 1986). Hypotheses concerning the significance of sclerophylly fall into three categories. It has been argued that sclerophylls are primarily adapted for water conservation, nutrient conservation or the prevention of damage. I believe that critical examination of the data available indicates that the anatomical features typical of sclerophylls serve a fundamentally protective function. The reasons for this statement will be discussed after reviewing the characteristics of sclerophylls.

[1]  B. Kotterink,et al.  Hydrological observations in montane rain forests on Gunung Silam, Sabah, Malaysia, with special reference to the «Massenerhebung» effect , 1993 .

[2]  H. Clifford,et al.  The taxonomic and evolutionary significance of leaf longevity , 1993 .

[3]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function , 1993 .

[4]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[5]  R. D. Evans,et al.  Osmotic relations of the drought‐tolerant shrub Artemisia tridentata in response to water stress , 1992 .

[6]  P. Lucas,et al.  The Fracture Toughness of the Leaf of the Dicotyledon Calophyllum inophyllum L. (Guttiferae) , 1991 .

[7]  Paul J. Kramer,et al.  The Physiological Ecology of Woody Plants , 1991 .

[8]  Julian F. V. Vincent,et al.  Strength and fracture of grasses , 1991, Journal of Materials Science.

[9]  K. Ruohomäki,et al.  Nutritional quality as a defense against herbivores , 1991 .

[10]  E. Cuevas,et al.  Sclerophylly and oligotrophic environments : relationships between leaf structure, mineral nutrient content, and drought resistance in tropical rain forests of the upper Rio Negro region , 1990 .

[11]  M. Gullo,et al.  Sclerophylly and plant water relations in three Mediterranean Quercus species. , 1990 .

[12]  P. Rundel,et al.  Sclerophylly and Foliar Nutrient Status of Mediterranean-Climate Plant Communities in Southern Australia , 1990 .

[13]  H. Mooney,et al.  Relationships Among Leaf Construction Cost, Leaf Longevity, and Light Environment in Rain-Forest Plants of the Genus Piper , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[14]  F. Chapin,et al.  The Cost of Tundra Plant Structures: Evaluation of Concepts and Currencies , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[15]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Leaf anatomy and water relations in tropical elfin cloud forest tree species. , 1989 .

[16]  E. Corner Wayside trees of Malaya , 1991 .

[17]  T. Koike Leaf Structure and Photosynthetic Performance as Related to the Forest Succession of Deciduous Broad‐Leaved Trees1 , 1988 .

[18]  E. Bennett,et al.  A comparison of the floristics and leaf chemistry of the tree flora in two Malaysian rain forests and the influence of leaf chemistry on populations of colobine monkeys in the Old World , 1988 .

[19]  M. A. Lo Gullo,et al.  Different strategies of drought resistance in three Mediterranean sclerophyllous trees growing in the same environmental conditions. , 1988, The New phytologist.

[20]  B. Campbell Plant spinescence and herbivory in a nutrient poor ecosystem , 1986 .

[21]  William W. Hargrove,et al.  Herbivory in Forested Ecosystems , 1986 .

[22]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Resource Availability and Plant Antiherbivore Defense , 1985, Science.

[23]  V. Kapos,et al.  Water Relations of Jamaican Upper Montane Rain Forest Trees , 1985 .

[24]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory , 1983 .

[25]  J. Proctor,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STUDIES IN FOUR CONTRASTING LOWLAND RAIN FORESTS IN GUNUNG MULU NATIONAL PARK, SARAWAK II. LITTERFALL, LITTER STANDING CROP AND PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON HERBIVORY , 1983 .

[26]  M. Lowman,et al.  Variation in leaf toughness and phenolic content among five species of Australian rain forest trees , 1983 .

[27]  C. Körner,et al.  Altitudinal variation of leaf diffusive conductance and leaf anatomy in heliophytes of montane New Guinea and their interrelation with microclimate , 1983 .

[28]  P. A. Morrow The Role of Sclerophyllous Leaves in Determining Insect Grazing Damage , 1983 .

[29]  David J. Hicks,et al.  The Ecology of Leaf Life Spans , 1982 .

[30]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Chemical characteristics of the foliage of some deciduous trees in southeastern Ontario , 1982 .

[31]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  Environmental physiology of plants , 1982 .

[32]  D. McKey,et al.  Food selection by black colobus monkeys (Colobus satanas) in relation to plant chemistry , 1981 .

[33]  F. Macdonald,et al.  An Investigation of the Leaf Anatomy, Foliar Mineral Levels, and Water Relations of Trees of a Sarawak Forest , 1981 .

[34]  A. A. Bell Biochemical Mechanisms of Disease Resistance , 1981 .

[35]  Jeng-Sheng Huang,et al.  Chapter 6 – Defense at the Perimeter: The Outer Walls and the Gates , 1980 .

[36]  K. Milton Factors Influencing Leaf Choice by Howler Monkeys: A Test of Some Hypotheses of Food Selection by Generalist Herbivores , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[37]  T. Givnish On the Adaptive Significance of Leaf Form , 1979 .

[38]  J. Bunce,et al.  Drought-Stress Effects on Leaf Carbon Balance , 1979 .

[39]  M. Sobrado,et al.  Significance of leaf orientation for leaf temperature in an amazonian sclerophyll vegetation , 1978, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[40]  P. Grubb Control of Forest Growth and Distribution on Wet Tropical Mountains: with Special Reference to Mineral Nutrition , 1977 .

[41]  H. Mooney,et al.  The Water Factor and Convergent Evolution in Mediterranean-type Vegetation , 1976 .

[42]  J. Proctor,et al.  Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East. , 1977 .

[43]  D. Janzen Tropical blackwater rivers, animals, and mast fruiting by the Dipterocarpaceae , 1974 .

[44]  G. Seddon Xerophytes, xeromorphs and sclerophylls: the history of some concepts in ecology. , 1974, Biological journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London.

[45]  E. F. Brünig Ecological studies in the kerangas forests of Sarawak and Brunei , 1974 .

[46]  P. Kramer,et al.  Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses , 1973 .

[47]  E. Small Photosynthetic rates in relation to nitrogen recycling as an adaptation to nutrient deficiency in peat bog plants , 1972 .

[48]  N. Beadle Soil Phosphate and Its Role in Molding Segments of the Australian Flora and Vegetation, with Special Reference to Xeromorphy and Sclerophylly , 1966 .

[49]  S. D. Beck Resistance of Plants to Insects , 1965 .

[50]  A. Loveless Further Evidence to Support a Nutritional Interpretation of Sclerophylly , 1962 .

[51]  A. Loveless A Nutritional Interpretation of Sclerophylly Based on Differences in the Chemical Composition of Sclerophyllous and Mesophytic Leaves , 1961 .

[52]  L. Webb,et al.  A Physiognomic Classification of Australian Rain Forests , 1959 .

[53]  R. Holttum Periodic leaf-change and flowering of trees in Singapore. II. , 1940 .

[54]  E. Warming Oecology of plants , 1909 .