Do task-irrelevant direction-associated motion verbs affect action planning? Evidence from a Stroop paradigm

Does simply seeing a word such as rise activate upward responses? The present study is concerned with bottom-up activation of motion-related experiential traces. Verbs referring to an upward or downward motion (e.g., rise/fall) were presented in one of four colors. Participants had to perform an upward or downward hand movement (Experiments 1 and 2a/2b) or a stationary up or down located keypress response (Experiment 3) according to font color. In all experiments, responding was faster if the word’s immanent motion direction matched the response (e.g., upward/up response in case of rise); however, this effect was strongest in the experiments requiring an actual upward or downward response movement (Experiments 1 and 2a/2b). These findings suggest bottom-up activation of motion-related experiential traces, even if the task does not demand lexical access or focusing on a word’s meaning.

[1]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  B. Kaup,et al.  Root versus roof: automatic activation of location information during word processing , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Motor Resonance and Linguistic Focus , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[6]  M. Costantini,et al.  When objects are close to me: Affordances in the peripersonal space , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  R. Proctor,et al.  Influence of Irrelevant Information on Human Performance: Effects of S-R Association Strength and Relative Timing , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  C. Buss,et al.  Children's Brain Development Benefits from Longer Gestation , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[9]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptions of perceptual symbols , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  Ronald E. Shor,et al.  Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction, and numerosity , 1971 .

[11]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[12]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Influences of hand posture and hand position on compatibility effects for up-down stimuli mapped to left-right responses: Evidence for a hand referent hypothesis , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  George S. Cree,et al.  Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words , 2008, Cognition.

[15]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Context Effects in Embodied Lexical-Semantic Processing , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[17]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Ronald E. Shor,et al.  The processing of conceptual information on spatial directions from pictorial and linguistic symbols , 1970 .

[19]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Donald R. Barr,et al.  Using Confidence Intervals to Test Hypotheses , 1969 .

[22]  M. de Vega,et al.  Metaphors are Embodied, and so are Their Literal Counterparts , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[23]  Daniel N. Bub,et al.  On the nature of hand-action representations evoked during written sentence comprehension , 2010, Cognition.

[24]  B. Rossion,et al.  Fixation Patterns During Recognition of Personally Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[25]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words , 2008, Current Biology.

[26]  D. Palermo,et al.  The Nature and Ontogenesis of Meaning , 2023 .

[27]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[28]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Cross-talk between Language Processes and Overt Motor Behavior in the First 200 msec of Processing , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Spatial language, visual attention, and perceptual simulation , 2010, Brain and Language.

[31]  P. König,et al.  Testing the theory of embodied cognition with subliminal words , 2010, Cognition.

[32]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Barbara Kaup Word- vs. sentence-based simulation effects in language comprehension , 2012 .

[34]  Livia Colle,et al.  The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[35]  L. Tyler,et al.  Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[38]  Srini Narayanan,et al.  Spatial and Linguistic Aspects of Visual Imagery in Sentence Comprehension , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  M. Candidi,et al.  Mapping Implied Body Actions in the Human Motor System , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  C. S. Englert,et al.  Influence of Irrelevant Information in Addition Word Problems on Problem Solving , 1987 .

[41]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Embodied sentence comprehension 1 EMBODIED SENTENCE COMPREHENSION , 2009 .