The mitigating role of holistic thinking on choice overload

Purpose This paper aims to demonstrate how and why holistic thinking mitigates the negative impact of large assortments on satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach Five between-subject experiments demonstrate the mitigating role of holism on choice overload across a variety of contexts. Findings While large assortments create overload feeling, holistic thinking mitigates the negative impact of overload feeling on satisfaction for both chronic (Studies 1a and 1b) and decision-specific (Studies 1b and 1c) holistic thinkers, as well as those who adopt a more holistic thinking style because of the decision goal (Study 2) or incidental priming (Study 3). Research limitations/implications This paper introduces a new moderator of choice overload effects – holistic thinking – and shows how it mitigates the negative indirect effect of assortment size on satisfaction. This paper contributes to the literature on assortment size effects and shows that even when assortment size increases overload feeling, this negative impact of assortment size can still be reduced. Practical implications Marketers with large assortments can reduce the negative impact of overload feeling and increase satisfaction by promoting the hedonic features of the products and encouraging holistic thinking. Similarly, consumers can reduce the negative impact of overload feeling by approaching their consumption more holistically either because of their individual traits or situational factors. Originality/value This research contributes a new moderator to the choice overload literature: holistic thinking. In doing so, it adopts a broader consideration of the decision-making process underlying overload effects and pinpoints how (i.e. by which path) holistic thinking mitigates the negative impact of large assortments.

[1]  Richard A. Werbel,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Brand Loyalty for Major Household Appliances , 1973 .

[2]  R. Lipsey,et al.  COMPARISON SHOPPING AND THE CLUSTERING OF HOMOGENEOUS FIRMS , 1979 .

[3]  S. Lagakos,et al.  The Information Overload Controversy: An Alternative Viewpoint , 1982 .

[4]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[5]  B. Kahn,et al.  Modeling choice among assortments. , 1991 .

[6]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  “Some Things You Learn Aren't So”: Cohen's Paradox, Asch's Paradigm, and the Interpretation of Interaction , 1995 .

[7]  M. F. Luce,et al.  An Information Processing Perspective on Choice , 1995 .

[8]  J. Dietz Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer , 1997 .

[9]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[10]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[11]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[12]  L. Werth,et al.  Attentional Priming Effects on Creativity , 2003 .

[13]  A. Chernev When More Is Less and Less Is More: the Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice This Research Argues That Choices from Different Size Assort- Ments Are a Function of the Degree to Which Consumers Have , 2022 .

[14]  R. Buck,et al.  Emotion and reason in persuasion: Applying the ARI model and the CASC Scale☆ , 2004 .

[15]  Nicholas H. Lurie Decision Making in Information-Rich Environments: The Role of Information Structure , 2004 .

[16]  B. Schwartz The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less , 2004 .

[17]  Donnavieve N. Smith,et al.  Online Peer and Editorial Recommendations, Trust, and Choice in Virtual Markets , 2005 .

[18]  Chien-Huang Lin,et al.  The effect of variety on consumer preferences: The role of need for cognition and recommended alternatives , 2006 .

[19]  Chris Anderson,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .

[20]  Debora Viana Thompson,et al.  The Effects of Information Processing Mode on Consumers' Responses to Comparative Advertising , 2006 .

[21]  I. Simonson,et al.  The Influence of Product Variety on Brand Perception and Choice , 2006 .

[22]  K. Diehl,et al.  Great Expectations?! Assortment Size, Expectations, and Satisfaction , 2008 .

[23]  I. Choi,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Individual Differences in Analytic versus Holistic Thinking , 2022 .

[24]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[25]  L. Brenner,et al.  Feeling and Thinking in Memory-Based versus Stimulus-Based Choices , 2007 .

[26]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  When does negative brand publicity hurt? The moderating influence of analytic versus holistic thinking , 2008 .

[27]  S. Iyengar,et al.  The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction , 2008 .

[28]  Nilüfer Z. Aydınoğlu,et al.  Guiltless Gluttony: The Asymmetric Effect of Size Labels on Size Perceptions and Consumption , 2011 .

[29]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When “goods satiate” , 2009 .

[30]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on assortment structure and choice , 2009 .

[31]  Kenneth D. Bahn,et al.  When Do Large Product Assortments Benefit Consumers? An Information-Processing Perspective , 2009 .

[32]  J. Förster Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: how global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  P. Todd,et al.  What Moderates the Too-Much-Choice Effect? , 2009 .

[34]  P. Todd,et al.  Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload , 2010 .

[35]  Ritesh Saini,et al.  The psychological underpinnings of relative thinking in price comparisons , 2010 .

[36]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  What Makes Brands Elastic? The Influence of Brand Concept and Styles of Thinking on Brand Extension Evaluation , 2010 .

[37]  Simona Botti,et al.  The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions , 2011 .

[38]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[39]  G. A. Kleef,et al.  Intuition versus Deliberation: The Role of Information Processing in Judgment and Decision Making , 2012 .

[40]  Ann Kronrod,et al.  Enjoy! Hedonic Consumption and Compliance with Assertive Messages , 2012 .

[41]  Evan Polman Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  F. Völckner,et al.  The Double-Edged Sword of Foreign Brand Names for Companies from Emerging Countries , 2012 .

[43]  Sylvain Senecal,et al.  Using Recommendation Agents to Cope with Information Overload , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[44]  Amar Cheema,et al.  Influence of Warm versus Cool Temperatures on Consumer Choice: A Resource Depletion Account , 2012 .

[45]  Jonathan Levav,et al.  The Effect of Ordering Decisions by Choice-Set Size on Consumer Search , 2012 .

[46]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[47]  Marlone D. Henderson,et al.  There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[48]  S. Danziger,et al.  “Wii Will Rock You!” The Use and Effect of Figurative Language in Consumer Reviews of Hedonic and Utilitarian Consumption , 2013 .

[49]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect moderates the impact of assortment size on choice satisfaction , 2013 .

[50]  B. Kahn,et al.  The "visual preference heuristic": The influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload , 2014 .

[51]  U. Böckenholt,et al.  Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis , 2015 .

[52]  A. Hayes An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation , 2015, Multivariate behavioral research.

[53]  D. Hine,et al.  Thinking styles and decision making: A meta-analysis. , 2016, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  Sorin M. Sorescu,et al.  Customer Satisfaction and Long-Term Stock Returns , 2016 .