Does land use affect perceptual range? Evidence from two marsupials of the Atlantic Forest

Perceptual range is one of the main determinants of dispersal success in fragmented landscapes, which are composed of scattered remnants of original habitat in a matrix of variable composition. How perceptual range varies according to land use is essential information to estimate the functional connectivity of landscapes. We determined for the first time how different types of land use affect the perceptual range of a species, using as model organisms two neotropical marsupials endemic to the Atlantic Forest in Brazil (Philander frenatus and Didelphis aurita). We released and tracked the movements of 196 individuals in three types of land use commonly found in fragmented landscapes: manioc plantation, mowed pasture and abandoned pasture. We also determined how orientation to the nearest forest fragment is affected by distance to the fragment, wind speed, body mass and sex using a model selection approach. The type of land use affected the perceptual ranges of both marsupials. The estimated perceptual ranges for P. frenatus and D. aurita were 100 and 200 m in the mowed pasture, respectively, 50 and <30 m in the abandoned pasture and 30 and 50 m in the plantation. The orientation of both species decreased with increasing distance to the fragment, but for D. aurita orientation also increased with the wind speed and body mass. These results agree with previous studies depicting a general pattern of increased perceptual range with lower vegetation obstruction in the matrix and larger body mass and wind speed, depending on the use of visual versus olfactory cues by animals. Our findings allow more realistic estimates of functional connectivity in fragmented landscapes based on basic information on the biology of each species and the type of matrix.

[1]  Marcus Vinícius Vieira,et al.  Support diameter, incline, and vertical movements of four didelphid marsupials in the Atlantic forest of Brazil , 2002 .

[2]  Kyle J. Haynes,et al.  MATRIX COMPOSITION AFFECTS THE SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF A PRAIRIE PLANTHOPPER , 2003 .

[3]  Marcus Vinícius Vieira,et al.  Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[4]  REBECCA S. YEOMANS,et al.  Water-finding in adult turtles: random search or oriented behaviour? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Landscape-level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice : perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat , 1997 .

[6]  R. Schooley,et al.  Limited perceptual range and anemotaxis in marsh rice ratsOryzomys palustris , 2010, Acta Theriologica.

[7]  Michael S. Miller,et al.  Forces structuring tree squirrel communities in landscapes fragmented by agriculture: species differences in perceptions of forest connectivity and carrying capacity , 2003 .

[8]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics , 2006 .

[9]  Patrick A. Zollner,et al.  Using body size to predict perceptual range , 2002 .

[10]  J. Prevedello,et al.  Plantation rows as dispersal routes: a test with didelphid marsupials in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. , 2010 .

[11]  E. Nimer Climatologia do Brasil , 1979 .

[12]  Darren J. Bender,et al.  Testing for habitat detection distances using orientation data , 1999 .

[13]  I. Caldwell,et al.  A compass without a map: tortuosity and orientation of eastern painted turtles (Chrysemys picta picta) released in unfamiliar territory , 2006 .

[14]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[15]  G. Forero-Medina,et al.  Perception of a fragmented landscape by neotropical marsupials: effects of body mass and environmental variables , 2009, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[16]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes , 2004 .

[17]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Illumination and the perception of remote habitat patches by white-footed mice , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  E. Flaherty,et al.  Experimental trials of the northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus) traversing managed rainforest landscapes: perceptual range and fine-scale movements , 2008 .

[19]  F. Fernandez,et al.  Frequency of movements of small mammals among Atlantic Coastal Forest fragments in Brazil , 2002 .

[20]  J. Prevedello,et al.  Movement behaviour within and beyond perceptual ranges in three small mammals: effects of matrix type and body mass. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[21]  Henrique Santiago Alberto Carlos,et al.  Use of a fragmented landscape by three species of opossum in south-eastern Brazil , 2007, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[22]  S. L. Lima,et al.  SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .

[23]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Finding habitat patches and directional connectivity , 2003 .

[24]  Patrick A. Zollner,et al.  Comparing the landscape level perceptual abilities of forest sciurids in fragmented agricultural landscapes* , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  R. Pardini,et al.  Small mammals in a mosaic of forest remnants and anthropogenic habitats—evaluating matrix quality in an Atlantic forest landscape , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[27]  R. Cerqueira,et al.  Land use vs. fragment size and isolation as determinants of small mammal composition and richness in Atlantic Forest remnants , 2009 .

[28]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral tradeoffs when dispersing across a patchy landscape , 2005 .

[29]  Guy Pe'er,et al.  Incorporating the perceptual range of animals into connectivity models , 2008 .