A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology

A hydrological forecasting model is presented that attempts to combine the important distributed effects of channel network topology and dynamic contributing areas with the advantages of simple lumped parameter basin models. Quick response flow is predicted from a storage/contributing area relationship derived analytically from the topographic structure of a unit within a basin. Average soil water response is represented by a constant leakage infiltration store and an exponential subsurface water store. A simple non-linear routing procedure related to the link frequency distribution of the channel network completes the model and allows distinct basin sub-units, such as headwater and sideslope areas to be modelled separately. The model parameters are physically based in the sense that they may be determined directly by measurement and the model may be used at ungauged sites. Procedures for applying the model and tests with data from the Crimple Beck basin are described. Using only measured and estimated parameter values, without optimization, the model makes satisfactory predictions of basin response. The modular form of the model structure should allow application over a range of small and medium sized basins while retaining the possibility of including more complex model components when suitable data are available.

[1]  R. Horton The Rôle of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle , 1933 .

[2]  C. O. Clark Storage and the Unit Hydrograph , 1945 .

[3]  J. E. Nash,et al.  The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph , 1957 .

[4]  J. Dooge A general theory of the unit hydrograph , 1959 .

[5]  J. Nash A unit hydrograph study, with particular reference to British catchments [Discussion] , 1960 .

[6]  R. Betson,et al.  What is watershed runoff , 1964 .

[7]  R. Wooding,et al.  A hydraulic model for the catchment-stream problem. II. Numerical solutions , 1965 .

[8]  R. Wooding,et al.  A hydraulic model for the catchment-stream problem: I. Kinematic-wave theory , 1965 .

[9]  R. Wooding,et al.  A hydraulic model for the catchment-stream problem: III. Comparison with runoff observations , 1966 .

[10]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[11]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 2. Upstream source areas , 1972 .

[12]  L. D. James Hydrologic modeling, parameter estimation, and watershed characteristics , 1972 .

[13]  W. G. Knisel Comments on ‘Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 2, upstream source areas’ by R. Allan Freeze , 1973 .

[14]  A. Aitken,et al.  Assessing systematic errors in rainfall-runoff models , 1973 .

[15]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Mathematical simulation of subsurface flow contributions to snowmelt runoff, Reynolds Creek Watershed, Idaho , 1974 .

[16]  Edwin T. Engman,et al.  A partial area model for storm flow synthesis , 1974 .

[17]  A. Surkan Simulation of storm velocity effects on flow from distributed channel networks , 1974 .

[18]  J. R. Douglas Conceptual modelling in hydrology , 1974 .

[19]  John D. Hewlett,et al.  Non-Point and Diffused Water Sources: A Variable Source Area Problem , 1975 .

[20]  R. Freeze A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of one‐dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media , 1975 .

[21]  Daryl B. Simons,et al.  Nonlinear kinematic wave approximation for water routing , 1975 .

[22]  M. Kirkby Tests of the random network model, and its application to basin hydrology , 1976 .