Maximizing tandem solar cell power extraction using a three-terminal design

Tandem or multijunction solar cells can greatly increase the efficiency of solar energy conversion by absorbing different energies of the incident solar illumination in semiconductors with different band-gaps, which can operate more efficiently than a single absorber. Many different designs of tandem cells based on high efficiency top cells and Si bottom cells have been proposed, and there is ongoing debate as to whether the sub-cells should be wired in series (to create a tandem device with two terminals) or operated independently (four terminals). An alternative cell configuration that combines some of the strengths of both is a three-terminal device consisting of a top cell optically in series with a modified interdigitated back contact (IBC) Si cell featuring a conductive top contact. Such a configuration can enable improved energy yield while only requiring external wiring on the front and back of the solar cell stack. In this paper, we investigate the operation of three terminal tandems in detail using technology computer aided design (TCAD) device physics simulations. Using III–V top cells as an example case, we show how the addition of a third terminal can deliver comparable power output to a four terminal device, and substantially more power than a two-terminal device, while also enabling power injection and extraction between the two sub-circuits under a variety of spectral conditions.

[1]  Henry J. Snaith,et al.  Predicting and optimising the energy yield of perovskite-on-silicon tandem solar cells under real world conditions , 2017 .

[2]  Kelsey A. W. Horowitz,et al.  Raising the one-sun conversion efficiency of III–V/Si solar cells to 32.8% for two junctions and 35.9% for three junctions , 2017, Nature Energy.

[3]  F. Feldmann,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Carrier-Selective Electron Contacts Featuring Tunnel Oxides , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[4]  F. Feldmann,et al.  Theoretical Investigation of Carrier-selective Contacts Featuring Tunnel Oxides by Means of Numerical Device Simulation☆ , 2015 .

[5]  James M. Gee,et al.  A comparison of different module configurations for multi-band-gap solar cells , 1988 .

[6]  Ming Chen,et al.  Effect of spherical metallic nanoparticles in active layer on absorption enhancement in organic solar cells , 2017 .

[7]  R. Brendel,et al.  Interdigitated back contact solar cells with polycrystalline silicon on oxide passivating contacts for both polarities , 2017 .

[8]  E. Garnett,et al.  Nanoscale Back Contact Perovskite Solar Cell Design for Improved Tandem Efficiency , 2017, Nano letters.

[9]  Myles A. Steiner,et al.  Enhanced external radiative efficiency for 20.8 efficient single-junction GaInP solar cells , 2013 .

[10]  C. Cañizo,et al.  A 3 Terminal Parallel Connected Silicon Tandem Solar Cell , 2016 .

[11]  Daryl R. Myers,et al.  Description and availability of the SMARTS spectral model for photovoltaic applications , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[12]  Sara MacAlpine,et al.  Simulated potential for enhanced performance of mechanically stacked hybrid III–V/Si tandem photovoltaic modules using DC–DC converters , 2017 .

[13]  Moritz H. Futscher,et al.  Efficiency Limit of Perovskite/Si Tandem Solar Cells , 2016 .

[14]  A. Rohatgi,et al.  Modeling the potential of screen printed front junction CZ silicon solar cell with tunnel oxide passivated back contact , 2017 .

[15]  S. Glunz,et al.  Improved parameterization of Auger recombination in silicon , 2012 .

[16]  David Faiman Organic solar cells for large-scale fossil-competitive power production: science fiction? Perhaps no! , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[17]  Sarah E. Sofia,et al.  Metal grid contact design of four-terminal tandem solar cells , 2017, 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[18]  Benjamin G. Lee,et al.  Transparent Conductive Adhesives for Tandem Solar Cells Using Polymer-Particle Composites. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[19]  R. Brendel,et al.  Junction resistivity of carrier selective polysilicon on oxide junctions and its impact on the solar cell performance , 2017, 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC).

[20]  Jonathan P. Mailoa,et al.  23.6%-efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with improved stability , 2017, Nature Energy.

[21]  Myles A. Steiner,et al.  A monolithic three‐terminal GaInAsP/GaInAs tandem solar cell , 2009 .

[22]  Pietro P. Altermatt,et al.  Models for numerical device simulations of crystalline silicon solar cells—a review , 2011 .

[23]  M. Emziane,et al.  Double-junction three-terminal photovoltaic devices: A modeling approach , 2007 .

[24]  Zhe Liu,et al.  The realistic energy yield potential of GaAs-on-Si tandem solar cells: a theoretical case study. , 2015, Optics express.

[25]  Zhengshan Yu,et al.  Selecting tandem partners for silicon solar cells , 2016, Nature Energy.

[26]  F. Dimroth,et al.  Monolithic Two-Terminal III–V//Si Triple-Junction Solar Cells With 30.2% Efficiency Under 1-Sun AM1.5g , 2017, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[27]  Three-terminal heterojunction bipolar transistor solar cell for high-efficiency photovoltaic conversion , 2015, Nature communications.

[28]  Mitchell Lee,et al.  Energy-yield prediction for II–VI-based thin-film tandem solar cells , 2016 .

[29]  Takashi Jimbo,et al.  High-Efficiency Monolithic Three-Terminal GaAs/Si Tandem Solar Cells Fabricated by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition , 1996 .