Underlying factors of social capital acquisition in the context of online-gaming: Comparing World of Warcraft and Counter-Strike

We constructed and evaluated a model of social capital acquisition in online-gaming.Behaviors in clans and guilds predict self-disclosure and communication frequency.Self-disclosure and communication frequency predict social capital acquisition.The model fits the data well for samples stemming from games of different genres. The present study examines how players' behaviors within gaming-communities (clans and guilds) influence the acquisition of social capital in online-gaming. In contrast to most existing studies, our study asks for crucial underlying factors of social capital acquisition and thereby includes players of online-games of different genres to allow comparisons. We hypothesize that frequently playing together (familiarity), participating in offline events (physical proximity) and being involved in clan/guild administration (social proximity) lead to more communication with fellow players and foster self-disclosure towards fellow players, which together facilitates the formation of bridging and bonding social capital. A sample of 682 clan/guild players of the games Counter-Strike and World of Warcraft was recruited via Internet and was asked to fill out a questionnaire. Results of a path analysis support our assumptions and enhance previous findings that players of online-games especially gain positive social outcomes, when they go beyond the game and join game-related groups, engage in clan/guild administration and participate in offline events. By revealing the crucial role of self-disclosure and communication frequency as underlying factors of social capital acquisition in online-gaming, our results provide a deeper insight into these mechanisms than existing studies. Our findings have implications of general importance, since the tested model worked well for player samples stemming from online-games of different genres.

[1]  Sook Jung Lee,et al.  Online Communication and Adolescent Social Ties: Who benefits more from Internet use? , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  D. Gentile,et al.  The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviors, and school performance. , 2004, Journal of adolescence.

[3]  J. Alison Bryant,et al.  IMing, Text Messaging, and Adolescent Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. , 2008 .

[5]  Nick Yee,et al.  Motivations for Play in Online Games , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[7]  C. Anderson,et al.  Effects of Violent Video Games on Aggressive Behavior, Aggressive Cognition, Aggressive Affect, Physiological Arousal, and Prosocial Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Scientific Literature , 2001, Psychological science.

[8]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  Conceptualization and Measurement of Reported Self-Disclosure. , 1976 .

[9]  Waipeng Lee,et al.  Internet and Displacement Effect: Children's Media Use and Activities in Singapore , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[10]  Chieh-Peng Lin,et al.  Assessing the mediating role of online social capital between social support and instant messaging usage , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[11]  John Meurig Thomas,et al.  Close relationships , 1985, Nature.

[12]  Isto Huvila,et al.  Social capital in Second Life , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..

[13]  Tetsurou Kobayashi.  Bridging Social Capital in Online Communities: Heterogeneity and Social Tolerance of Online Game Players in Japan , 2010 .

[14]  Marie Faerber,et al.  The Sage Sourcebook Of Advanced Data Analysis Methods For Communication Research , 2016 .

[15]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Social Interactions in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Gamers , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[16]  Gerit Götzenbrucker,et al.  Towards the careers of long-term gamers in Austria , 2009 .

[17]  Lawrence R. Wheeless.  SELF‐DISCLOSURE AND INTERPERSONAL SOLIDARITY: MEASUREMENT, VALIDATION, AND RELATIONSHIPS , 1976 .

[18]  Wendy M. Grossman.  I Seek You. , 2002 .

[19]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Pavica Sheldon.  "I'll poke you. You'll poke me!" Self-disclosure, social attraction, predictability and trust as important predictors of Facebook relationships , 2009 .

[21]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations, and Sociability: A Time Diary Study , 2008 .

[22]  Andrea Sciandra,et al.  Social capital and social network sites: an empirical analysis of European high school students , 2011 .

[23]  Daniel Pitcher,et al.  Effects of violent video games on aggressive thoughts and feelings: video games and reward , 2012 .

[24]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Social network activity and social well-being , 2010, CHI.

[25]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  The Impact of Time Online: Social Capital and Cyberbalkanization , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Cameron A. Marlow.  Linking without thinking : Weblogs , readership , and online social capital formation , 2006 .

[27]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .

[28]  Marko Siitonen.  Social interaction in online multiplayer communities , 2007 .

[29]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  Virtual “Third Places”: A Case Study of Sociability in Massively Multiplayer Games , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[30]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Personal Relationships and Personal Networks , 2007 .

[31]  Leonard Reinecke,et al.  The social side of gaming: How playing online computer games creates online and offline social support , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Feng-Yang Kuo,et al.  Can Blogging Enhance Subjective Well-Being Through Self-Disclosure? , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[33]  J. C. Dill,et al.  VIDEO GAME VIOLENCE: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE , 1998 .

[34]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[35]  Nick Yee,et al.  The Demographics, Motivations, and Derived Experiences of Users of Massively Multi-User Online Graphical Environments , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[36]  Louis Leung,et al.  Loneliness, Self-Disclosure, and ICQ ("I Seek You") Use , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[37]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF TRUST AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SELF‐DISCLOSURE , 1977 .

[38]  P. Cozby.  Self-disclosure: a literature review. , 1973, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[40]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[41]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[42]  D. Gentile,et al.  The Effects of Violent Video Game Habits on Adolescent Aggressive Attitudes and Behaviors. , 2001 .

[43]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Privacy in Interaction: Exploring Disclosure and Social Capital in Facebook , 2012, ICWSM.

[44]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[45]  Constance Steinkuehler,et al.  Where Everybody Knows Your (Screen) Name: Online Games as "Third Places" , 2006, DiGRA Conference.

[46]  Cuihua Shen.  The patterns, effects and evolution of player social networks in online gaming communities , 2010 .

[47]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[48]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users , 2011, CHI.

[49]  B. Byrne.  A Primer of Lisrel: Basic Applications and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Models , 1989 .

[50]  M. Skoric,et al.  Platforms for mediated sociability and online social capital: the role of Facebook and massively multiplayer online games , 2011 .

[51]  Scott E. Caplan,et al.  Who plays, how much, and why? Debunking the stereotypical gamer profile , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[52]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[53]  Harko Verhagen,et al.  Sensing game play. Exploring computer game play in a game café and a mass LAN party , 2011, 2011 16th International Conference on Computer Games (CGAMES).

[54]  Jeroen Jansz,et al.  Gaming at a LAN event: the social context of playing video games , 2005, New Media Soc..

[55]  Jocelyn M. DeGroot,et al.  Attitudes Toward Online Social Connection and Self-Disclosure as Predictors of Facebook Communication and Relational Closeness , 2011, Commun. Res..

[56]  C. Agnew,et al.  The Social and Physical Environment of Relationship Initiation , 1997 .

[57]  T. L. Taylor,et al.  This is how we play it: what a mega-LAN can teach us about games , 2010, FDG.

[58]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[59]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  Groups and Goblins: The Social and Civic Impact of an Online Game , 2006 .