Impairments of manual tracking performance during spaceflight: more converging evidence from a 20-day space mission

Studies of human performance during spaceflight have consistently revealed degradations of manual tracking performance in space. The present investigation analysed these performance decrements in more detail by applying frequency response analyses of tracking performance. It was hypothesized that tracking impairments result from two factors: at an early adaptation phase in space they primarily reflect effects of microgravity on human visuo-motor processes, whereas later into the mission they are also caused by impairments of attentional processes induced by cumulative workload and fatigue. In order to investigate this hypothesis, performance of one cosmonaut in a first-order unstable tracking task was repeatedly assessed before, during and after a 20-day space mission. Singlecase statistical analyses revealed the following effects: tracking performance declined at the first assessment in space and in two later inflight sessions compared to pre-flight baseline. Whereas the early tracking decrement was mainly due to an increase of the effective time-delay during tracking and accompanied by only minor changes of mood or workload, one of the later inflight impairments was due to an increase of effective time-delay, a decreased tracking gain, and an increase of tracking remnant, and both were associated with considerably higher workload ratings. This pattern of effects supports the two-factor hypothesis.

[1]  D F Stewart,et al.  Analysis of sleep on Shuttle missions. , 1988, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  C D Wickens,et al.  Resources, Confusions, and Compatibility in Dual Axis Tracking: Displays, Controls, and Dynamics , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Resources, confusions, and compatibility in dual-axis tracking: displays, controls, and dynamics. , 1989 .

[4]  D Manzey,et al.  Joint NASA-ESA-DARA Study. Part three: effects of chronically elevated CO2 on mental performance during 26 days of confinement. , 1998, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[5]  R E Schlegel,et al.  Cognitive performance aboard the life and microgravity spacelab. , 1998, Acta astronautica.

[6]  Corinna E. Lathan,et al.  Memory processes and motor control in extreme environments , 1999, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[7]  I. Howard,et al.  Accuracy of aimed arm movements in changed gravity. , 1992, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  D. Manzey,et al.  Mental performance in extreme environments: results from a performance monitoring study during a 438-day spaceflight. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[9]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[10]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Control Theory Measures of Tracking as Indices of Attention Allocation Strategies , 1977 .

[11]  R. Hockey.  Stress and fatigue in human performance , 1984 .

[12]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  A Review of Quasi-Linear Pilot Models , 1967 .

[13]  D A Ratino,et al.  Quantification of reaction time and time perception during Space Shuttle operations. , 1988, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  Jörg Beringer,et al.  Entwurf einer Anwendersprache zur Steuerung psychologischer Reaktionszeitexperimente , 1993 .

[15]  Dietrich Manzey,et al.  Changed visuomotor transformations during and after prolonged microgravity , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  D. Manzey,et al.  Mental performance during short-term and long-term spaceflight , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[17]  H. R. Jex.  Two Applications of a Critical-Instability Task to Secondary Work Load Research , 1967 .

[18]  G. R. J. Hockey.  Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[19]  J. Easterbrook.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[20]  A. Newberg,et al.  Changes in the central nervous system and their clinical correlates during long-term spaceflight. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[21]  C D Wickens,et al.  The effects of divided attention on information processing in manual tracking. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Bernd Lorenz,et al.  Dual-Task Performance in Space: Results from a Single-Case Study during a Short-Term Space Mission , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[23]  A Berthoz,et al.  Gaze control in microgravity. 1. Saccades, pursuit, eye-head coordination. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[24]  F. Gerstenbrand,et al.  Space and cognition: the measurement of behavioral functions during a 6-day space mission. , 1993, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[25]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Effects of Participatory Mode and Task Workload on the Detection of Dynamic System Failures , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[26]  Douglas A. Hibbs,et al.  Problems of Statistical Estimation and Causal Inference in Time-Series Regression Models , 1973 .

[27]  I Kozlovskaya,et al.  Pointing arm movements in short- and long-term spaceflights. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[28]  O Bock,et al.  Joint position sense in simulated changed-gravity environments. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[29]  A. Bond,et al.  The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings , 1974 .