Synthetic Information Environments for Policy Informatics : A Distributed Cognition Perspective

Socially-coupled policy domains, such as public health, are influenced by the collective behavior of millions of individuals who participate in them and respond to policy plans and interventions. Policy-making for these systems is challenging because their complexity and interdependencies that can have cascading consequences. The promise of policy informatics has been to provide computational tools that make managing information easier and to facilitate more efficacious policy planning by incorporating methodologies such as simulation. Here, we argue that we need to do more. Successful policy informatics has to take into account the differing perspectives and motivations of different stakeholders in the policy-making process. We describe synthetic information environments as a systematic solution to this problem by presenting a distributed cognition perspective. Synthetic information is constructed by combining information from multiple unstructured data sources. A synthetic information environment provides models for forecasting and for in-silico experimentation with intervention policies, while also maintaining and propagating constraints between different stakeholder views. When viewed as cognitive augmentation technology, we see that such an environment draws multiple stakeholders into a single distributed cognitive system, thereby enabling efficacious interaction and planning. We describe two different case studies in the context of pandemic preparedness planning which illustrate the use of our system.

[1]  O. Wolkenhauer Why model? , 2013, Front. Physiol..

[2]  Tamara Dumanovsky,et al.  Closing schools in response to the 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus in New York City: economic impact on households. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  Madhav V. Marathe,et al.  Coevolution of Epidemics, Social Networks, and Individual Behavior: A Case Study , 2010, SBP.

[4]  Madhav V. Marathe,et al.  An Integrated Modeling Environment to Study the Co-evolution of Networks, Individual Behavior and Epidemics , 2010, AI Mag..

[5]  Madhav V. Marathe,et al.  Generation and analysis of large synthetic social contact networks , 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[6]  E. Lyons,et al.  Pandemic Potential of a Strain of Influenza A (H1N1): Early Findings , 2009, Science.

[7]  Madhav V. Marathe,et al.  EpiFast: a fast algorithm for large scale realistic epidemic simulations on distributed memory systems , 2009, ICS.

[8]  L. Comfort Crisis Management in Hindsight: Cognition, Communication, Coordination, and Control , 2007 .

[9]  R. Wallace,et al.  Collective Consciousness and Its Discontents:: Institutional distributed cognition, racial policy, and public health in the United States , 2007 .

[10]  J. Sterman Learning from evidence in a complex world. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[11]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Policy implementation and cognition: The role of human, social, and distributed cognition in framing policy implementation , 2006 .

[12]  Johan F. Hoorn,et al.  Distributed cognition , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[13]  Rocky Ross,et al.  Mental models , 2004, SIGA.

[14]  Rick Grush,et al.  The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Modelling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks , 2004, Nature.

[16]  H. Artman,et al.  Situation Awareness as Distributed Cognition , 2004 .

[17]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[18]  Herbert W. Hethcote,et al.  The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[19]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  An optimal estimation approach to visual perception and learning , 1999, Vision Research.

[20]  A. Clark,et al.  The Extended Mind , 1998, Analysis.

[21]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  A Distributed Representation Approach to Group Problem Solving , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Donald T. Stuss,et al.  Neurobiology of conscious experience , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[26]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  M. Fullilove,et al.  'Many are called...': participation by minority leaders in an AIDS intervention in San Francisco. , 1992, Ethnicity & disease.

[28]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .