Unit Commitment : Computational Performance, System Representation and Wind Uncertainty Management

In recent years, high penetration of variable generating sources, such as wind power, has challenged independent system operators (ISO) in keeping a cheap and reliable power system operation. Any deviation between expected and real wind production must be absorbed by the power system resources (reserves), which must be available and ready to be deployed in real time. To guarantee this resource availability, the system resources must be committed in advance, usually the day-ahead, by solving the so-called unit commitment (UC) problem. If the quantity of committed resources is extremely low, there will be devastating and costly consequences in the system, such as significant load shedding. On the other hand, if this quantity is extremely high, the system operation will be excessively expensive, mainly because facilities will not be fully exploited. This thesis proposes computationally efficient models for optimal day-ahead planning in (thermal) power systems to adequately face the stochastic nature of wind production in the real-time system operation. The models can support ISOs to face the new challenges in short-term planning as uncertainty increases dramatically due to the integration of variable generating resources. This thesis then tackles the UC problem in the following aspects: Power system representation: This thesis identifies drawbacks of the traditional energy-block scheduling approach, which make it unable to adequately prepare the power system to face deterministic and perfectly known events. To overcome those drawbacks, we propose the ramp-based scheduling approach that more accurately describes the system operation, thus better exploiting the system flexibility. UC computational performance: Developing more accurate models would be pointless if these models considerably increase the computational burden of the UC problem, which is already a complex integer and non-convex problem. We then devise simultaneously tight and compact formulations under the mixed-integer programming (MIP) approach. This simultaneous characteristic reinforces the convergence speed by reducing the search space (tightness) and simultaneously increasing the searching speed (compactness) with which solvers explore that reduced space. Uncertainty management in UC: By putting together the improvements in the previous two aspects, this thesis contributes to a better management of wind uncertainty in UC, even though these two aspects are in conflict and improving one often means harming the other. If compared with a traditional energy-block UC model under the stochastic (deterministic) paradigm, a stochastic (deterministic) ramp-based UC model: 1) leads to more economic operation, due to a better and more detailed system representation, while 2) being solved significantly faster, because the core of the model is built upon simultaneously tight and compact MIP formulations. To further improve the uncertainty management in the proposed ramp-based UC, we extend the formulation to a network-constrained UC with robust reserve modelling. Based on robust optimization insights, the UC solution guarantees feasibility for any realization of the uncertain wind production, within the considered uncertainty ranges. This final model remains as a pure linear MIP problem whose size does not depend on the uncertainty representation, thus avoiding the inherent computational complications of the stochastic and robust UCs commonly found in the literature.

[1]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[2]  R. Wets,et al.  Stochastic programming , 1989 .

[3]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  The Price of Robustness , 2004, Oper. Res..

[4]  Paul Glasserman,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering , 2003 .

[5]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[6]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Stochastic Security-Constrained Unit Commitment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Laurence A. Wolsey,et al.  Strong formulations for mixed integer programs: valid inequalities and extended formulations , 2003, Math. Program..

[8]  Andres Ramos,et al.  Tight and Compact MILP Formulations for Unit Commitment Problems , 2013 .

[9]  A. Bakirtzis,et al.  Optimal Self-Scheduling of a Thermal Producer in Short-Term Electricity Markets by MILP , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  J. Hooker,et al.  Logic-Based Methods for Optimization: Combining Optimization and Constraint Satisfaction , 2000 .

[11]  M. Carrion,et al.  A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  A.J. Conejo,et al.  Modeling of start-up and shut-down power trajectories of thermal units , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Zuyi Li,et al.  Comparison of Scenario-Based and Interval Optimization Approaches to Stochastic SCUC , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Estimating the Spinning Reserve Requirements in Systems With Significant Wind Power Generation Penetration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  N.P. Padhy,et al.  Unit commitment-a bibliographical survey , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  J. García-González,et al.  Impact on reserves and energy delivery of current UC-based Market-Clearing formulations , 2012, 2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market.

[17]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Robust solutions of Linear Programming problems contaminated with uncertain data , 2000, Math. Program..

[18]  Robert E. Bixby,et al.  Mixed-Integer Programming: A Progress Report , 2004, The Sharpest Cut.

[19]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[20]  G. Sanchez,et al.  Direct Load Control Decision Model for Aggregated EV Charging Points , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory , 2009 .

[23]  F. Bouffard,et al.  Stochastic security for operations planning with significant wind power generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[24]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Effects of ramp-rate limits on unit commitment and economic dispatch , 1993 .

[25]  H. Y. Yamin,et al.  Review on methods of generation scheduling in electric power systems , 2004 .

[26]  Luis Rouco Rodríguez,et al.  Impacto en regulación frecuencia-potencia de los cambios de programa en escalón de las unidades generadoras , 2011 .

[27]  Jean-Philippe Vial,et al.  Robust Optimization , 2021, ICORES.

[28]  E. Welfonder,et al.  High frequency deviations within the European Power System: Origins and proposals for improvement , 2009, 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[29]  Ted K. Ralphs,et al.  Integer and Combinatorial Optimization , 2013 .

[30]  S. Stoft Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity , 2002 .

[31]  François Margot,et al.  Min-up/min-down polytopes , 2004, Discret. Optim..

[32]  Viktoria Neimane,et al.  Using Standard Deviation as a Measure of Increased Operational Reserve Requirement for Wind Power , 2008 .

[33]  Laurence A. Wolsey,et al.  Reformulation and Decomposition of Integer Programs , 2009, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[34]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Price-based unit commitment: a case of Lagrangian relaxation versus mixed integer programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[35]  Xu Andy Sun,et al.  Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Security Constrained Unit Commitment Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[36]  M. Amelin,et al.  Comparison of Capacity Credit Calculation Methods for Conventional Power Plants and Wind Power , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[37]  M. J. Maher,et al.  Model Building in Mathematical Programming , 1978 .

[38]  Ilan Momber,et al.  PEV storage in multi-bus scheduling problems , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[39]  Wil L. Kling,et al.  The impact of electricity market design on periodic network frequency excursions , 2011, 2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[40]  Zuyi Li,et al.  Market Operations in Electric Power Systems : Forecasting, Scheduling, and Risk Management , 2002 .

[41]  A. Ben-Tal,et al.  Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs , 2004, Math. Program..

[42]  Deepak Rajan,et al.  IBM Research Report Minimum Up/Down Polytopes of the Unit Commitment Problem with Start-Up Costs , 2005 .

[43]  F. A. Campos,et al.  Connecting the Intraday Energy and Reserve Markets by an Optimal Redispatch , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[44]  A. Papavasiliou,et al.  Reserve Requirements for Wind Power Integration: A Scenario-Based Stochastic Programming Framework , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[45]  Guang Li,et al.  Two-stage network constrained robust unit commitment problem , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  M. O'Malley,et al.  A new approach to quantify reserve demand in systems with significant installed wind capacity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[47]  Vladimiro Miranda,et al.  Reliability Assessment Unit Commitment with Uncertain Wind Power , 2013 .

[48]  Luis Olmos,et al.  Modeling the Operation of Electric Vehicles in an Operation Planning Model , 2011 .

[49]  Hector Chavez,et al.  Regulation Adequacy Analysis Under High Wind Penetration Scenarios in ERCOT Nodal , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[50]  Andrew L. Ott,et al.  Evolution of computing requirements in the PJM market: Past and future , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[51]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Security-constrained unit commitment for simultaneous clearing of energy and ancillary services markets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[52]  Ana Estanqueiro,et al.  Impacts of large amounts of wind power on design and operation of power systems, results of IEA collaboration , 2008 .

[53]  C. Gentile,et al.  Tighter Approximated MILP Formulations for Unit Commitment Problems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[54]  Andres Ramos,et al.  Tight and Compact MILP Formulation of Start-Up and Shut-Down Ramping in Unit Commitment , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[55]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Study of the interactions and dependencies of balancing markets, intraday trade and automatically activated reserves , 2009 .

[56]  M. Anjos,et al.  Tight Mixed Integer Linear Programming Formulations for the Unit Commitment Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[57]  J. Latorre,et al.  Tight and Compact MILP Formulation for the Thermal Unit Commitment Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[58]  A. Conejo,et al.  Market-clearing with stochastic security-part I: formulation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[59]  Robert E. Bixby,et al.  Solving Real-World Linear Programs: A Decade and More of Progress , 2002, Oper. Res..

[60]  Neil Genzlinger A. and Q , 2006 .

[61]  Constantine Caramanis,et al.  Theory and Applications of Robust Optimization , 2010, SIAM Rev..

[62]  P. Sauer,et al.  Uncertainty Management in the Unit Commitment Problem , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[63]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Wind and Energy Markets: A Case Study of Texas , 2012, IEEE Systems Journal.

[64]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Unit commitment with flexible generating units , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[65]  Robert E. Bixby,et al.  Progress in computational mixed integer programming—A look back from the other side of the tipping point , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[66]  François Bouffard,et al.  Scheduling and Pricing of Coupled Energy and Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Reserves , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[67]  Constantine Caramanis,et al.  Adaptable optimization: theory and algorithms , 2006 .

[68]  Vladimiro Miranda,et al.  Wind power forecasting in U.S. Electricity markets , 2010 .

[69]  Michael Ferris,et al.  Co-optimization of generation unit commitment and transmission switching with N-1 reliability , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[70]  L. T. Anstine,et al.  Application of Probability Methods to the Determination of Spinning Reserve Requirements for the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection , 1963 .

[71]  Bo Zeng,et al.  Robust unit commitment problem with demand response and wind energy , 2012, PES 2012.

[72]  Andrea Lodi,et al.  Mixed Integer Programming Computation , 2010, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[73]  Yongpei Guan,et al.  Unified Stochastic and Robust Unit Commitment , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[74]  Craig A. McKinstry,et al.  Low Probability Tail Event Analysis and Mitigation in the BPA Control Area , 2010 .

[75]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Component and Mode Models for the Short-Term Scheduling of Combined-Cycle Units , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.