Reducing road congestion through incentives: a case study

Traffic congestion is a burden on modern society: hundreds of billions of dollars are wasted each year due to extra fuel consumed, wasted time of commuters, traffic accidents, etc. Congestion occurs when the demand for transport capacity exceeds supply either in a sustained manner each day or just during peak hours. In the former case it is necessary to add transport capacity, whereas adding capacity to combat peak-hour congestion can be very expensive and create a vicious cycle which attracts “latent demand” to fill in the added capacity. Peak-hour demand must therefore be actively managed. Currently, several cities and agencies employ congestion charging which, while effective, often lacks popular support. In this paper the authors describe an approach that uses incentives to nudge commuter behavior towards congestion-reducing times and modes of travel. Specifically, they describe an incentive program, CAPRI (Congestion And Parking Relief Incentives), which aims to reduce peak-hour traffic in Stanford University. CAPRI rewards commuters who drive during off-peak hours and those who walk or bike to work. Commuter behavior is monitored using RFID sensors for automobiles and a smartphone app–My Beats–for walkers and bikers. A commuter who signs up for CAPRI earns points for the “good trips” she makes, and these points can be redeemed for rewards (both monetary and in-kind) in a fun, online game. CAPRI also nudges commuters through features like personalized offers, social influence and status. The paper describes the program, highlighting the effect of each of these features in nudging commuter behavior.

[1]  W. Vickrey Congestion Theory and Transport Investment , 1969 .

[2]  G. Currie Free Fare Incentives to Shift Rail Demand Peaks--Medium-term Impacts , 2011 .

[3]  Arild Hervik,et al.  Restraining car traffic in European cities: An emerging role for road pricing , 1992 .

[4]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change , 2003 .

[5]  B. Schaller New York City's Congestion Pricing Experience and Implications for Road Pricing Acceptance in the United States , 2010 .

[6]  Michiel C.J. Bliemer,et al.  Rewarding instead of charging road users: a model case study investigating effects on traffic conditions , 2010 .

[7]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Traffic Impacts of Variable Pricing on the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, California , 2012 .

[8]  Todd Litman,et al.  Generated Traffic and Induced Travel Implications for Transport Planning , 2010 .

[9]  J. Elíasson A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system , 2009 .

[10]  G. Hardin The Tragedy of the Commons , 2009 .

[11]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Behavior Insights for an Incentive-Based Active Demand Management Platform , 2015 .

[12]  D. Ettema,et al.  Carrots versus sticks: Rewarding commuters for avoiding the rush-hour— a study of willingness to participate , 2009 .

[13]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action , 2003 .