Risk Redux: The Resurgence of Risk Assessment in Criminal Sanctioning

After almost four decades of “just deserts,” the past several years have seen a remarkable resurgence of risk assessment as an essential component of criminal sanctioning. In this article, we review current practice in the incorporation of risk assessment into the sanctioning systems of several illustrative states, and describe the major dimensions on which state practices differ. We then elaborate the various meanings ascribed to the foundational concept of “risk” in criminal sanctioning, and contrast “risk” with what are now often called “criminogenic needs,” the fulfillment of which ostensibly reduce an offender’s level of “risk.” Finally, we address the choice of an approach to risk assessment in sentencing, particularly in the resource-starved state of current correctional practice.

[1]  L. Sechrest,et al.  The Rehabilitation of Criminal Offenders: Problems and Prospects , 1979 .

[2]  Sheldon X. Zhang,et al.  An Analysis of Prisoner Reentry and Parole Risk Using COMPAS and Traditional Criminal History Measures , 2014 .

[3]  Denise C. Gottfredson,et al.  Long-term effects of participation in the Baltimore City drug treatment court: Results from an experimental study , 2006 .

[4]  P. Howard,et al.  Identifying change in the likelihood of violent recidivism: causal dynamic risk factors in the OASys violence predictor. , 2013, Law and human behavior.

[5]  Natalie J. Jones,et al.  Predicting Criminal Recidivism in Adult Male Offenders , 2010 .

[6]  R. Weisberg,et al.  The dangers of Pyrrhic victories against mass incarceration , 2010, Daedalus.

[7]  Kirk Heilbrun,et al.  Prediction Versus Management Models Relevant to Risk Assessment: The Importance of Legal Decision-Making Context , 1997, Law and human behavior.

[8]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Coming to terms with the terms of risk. , 1997, Archives of general psychiatry.

[9]  Christopher T. Lowenkamp,et al.  DOES CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM QUALITY REALLY MATTER? THE IMPACT OF ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION* , 2006 .

[10]  Stephen C. P. Wong,et al.  The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Steven L. Chanenson,et al.  Reform in Motion: The Promise and Perils of Incorporating Risk Assessments and Cost-Benefit Analysis into Pennsylvania Sentencing , 2011 .

[12]  V. Quinsey,et al.  The Dynamic Prediction of Antisocial Behavior Among Forensic Psychiatric Patients , 2006, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[13]  Sonja B. Starr Evidence-Based Sentencing and the Scientific Rationalization of Discrimination , 2013 .

[14]  The Evolution of Sentencing Guidelines in Virginia: An Example of the Importance of Standardized and Automated Felony Sentencing Data , 2013 .

[15]  Sentencing Guidelines with Integrated Offender Risk Assessment , 2004 .