Validation of a Consensus Method for Identifying Delirium from Hospital Records

Background Delirium is increasingly considered to be an important determinant of trajectories of cognitive decline. Therefore, analyses of existing cohort studies measuring cognitive outcomes could benefit from methods to ascertain a retrospective delirium diagnosis. This study aimed to develop and validate such a method for delirium detection using routine medical records in UK and Ireland. Methods A point prevalence study of delirium provided the reference-standard ratings for delirium diagnosis. Blinded to study results, clinical vignettes were compiled from participants' medical records in a standardised manner, describing any relevant delirium symptoms recorded in the whole case record for the period leading up to case-ascertainment. An expert panel rated each vignette as unlikely, possible, or probable delirium and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results From 95 case records, 424 vignettes were abstracted by 5 trained clinicians. There were 29 delirium cases according to the reference standard. Median age of subjects was 76.6 years (interquartile range 54.6 to 82.5). Against the original study DSM-IV diagnosis, the chart abstraction method gave a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 7.8 (95% CI 5.7–12.0) and the negative LR of 0.45 (95% CI 0.40–0.47) for probable delirium (sensitivity 0.58 (95% CI 0.53–0.62); specificity 0.93 (95% CI 0.90–0.95); AUC 0.86 (95% CI 0.82–0.89)). The method diagnosed possible delirium with positive LR 3.5 (95% CI 2.9–4.3) and negative LR 0.15 (95% CI 0.11–0.21) (sensitivity 0.89 (95% CI 0.85–0.91); specificity 0.75 (95% CI 0.71–0.79); AUC 0.86 (95% CI 0.80–0.89)). Conclusions This chart abstraction method can retrospectively diagnose delirium in hospitalised patients with good accuracy. This has potential for retrospectively identifying delirium in cohort studies where routine medical records are available. This example of record linkage between hospitalisations and epidemiological data may lead to further insights into the inter-relationship between acute illness, as an exposure, for a range of chronic health outcomes.

[1]  J. Saczynski,et al.  Delirium in elderly people , 2014, The Lancet.

[2]  M. Boustani,et al.  The Epidemiology of Delirium: Challenges and Opportunities for Population Studies , 2013, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[3]  Karen J. Ferguson,et al.  New horizons in the pathogenesis, assessment and management of delirium , 2013, Age and ageing.

[4]  F. Martin,et al.  The delirium experience: what is the effect on patients, relatives and staff and what can be done to modify this? , 2013, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[5]  Kathleen O'Sullivan,et al.  Delirium in an adult acute hospital population: predictors, prevalence and detection , 2013, BMJ Open.

[6]  A. Gross,et al.  Delirium and Long-term Cognitive Trajectory Among Persons With Dementia. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  Hannah Keage,et al.  Delirium is a strong risk factor for dementia in the oldest-old: a population-based cohort study , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  John B. Young,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of multi-component interventions to prevent delirium in older people admitted to medical wards. , 2012, Age and ageing.

[9]  John B. Young,et al.  Diagnosis, prevention, and management of delirium: summary of NICE guidance , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  P. Eikelenboom,et al.  Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdischarge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia: a meta-analysis. , 2010, JAMA.

[11]  E. Sampson,et al.  Dementia in the acute hospital: prospective cohort study of prevalence and mortality , 2009, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[12]  E. Marcantonio,et al.  Delirium accelerates cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease , 2009, Neurology.

[13]  Najma Siddiqi,et al.  Occurrence and outcome of delirium in medical in-patients: a systematic literature review. , 2006, Age and ageing.

[14]  Ying Zhang,et al.  A Chart‐Based Method for Identification of Delirium: Validation Compared with Interviewer Ratings Using the Confusion Assessment Method , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[15]  D. Rennie,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  P. Trzepacz,et al.  Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98: comparison with the delirium rating scale and the cognitive test for delirium. , 2001, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[17]  E. Marcantonio,et al.  Reducing Delirium After Hip Fracture: A Randomized Trial , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  T R Holford,et al.  A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Anthony F Jorm.  A short form of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): development and cross-validation , 1994, Psychological Medicine.

[20]  N. Kerse,et al.  Prospective versus Retrospective Methods of Identifying Patients with Delirium , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[21]  S K Inouye,et al.  Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[22]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[23]  M. Roth,et al.  The Association Between Quantitative Measures of Dementia and of Senile Change in the Cerebral Grey Matter of Elderly Subjects , 1968, British Journal of Psychiatry.