Exhaust Nozzles for Propulsion Systems with Emphasis on Supersonic Cruise Aircraft

This compendium summarizes the contributions of the NASA-Lewis and its contractors to supersonic exhaust nozzle research from 1963 to 1985. Two major research and technology efforts sponsored this nozzle research work; the U.S. Supersonic Transport (SST) Program and the follow-on Supersonic Cruise Research (SCR) Program. They account for two generations of nozzle technology: the first from 1963 to 1971, and the second from 1971 to 1985. First, the equations used to calculate nozzle thrust are introduced. Then the general types of nozzles are presented, followed by a discussion of those types proposed for supersonic aircraft. Next, the first-generation nozzles designed specifically for the Boeing SST and the second-generation nozzles designed under the SCR program are separately reviewed and then compared. A chapter on throttle-dependent afterbody drag is included, since drag has a major effect on the off-design performance of supersonic nozzles. A chapter on the performance of supersonic dash nozzles follows, since these nozzles have similar design problems, Finally, the nozzle test facilities used at NASA-Lewis during this nozzle research effort are identified and discussed. These facilities include static test stands, a transonic wind tunnel, and a flying testbed aircraft. A concluding section points to the future: a third generation of nozzles designed for a new era of high speed civil transports to produce even greater advances in performance, to meet new noise rules, and to ensure the continuity of over two decades of NASA research.

[1]  Dave Bergman Exhaust Nozzle Drag: Engine vs Airplane Force Model , 1971 .

[2]  D. C. Mikkelson,et al.  Flight investigation of airframe installation effects on a variable flap ejector nozzle of an underwing engine nacelle at Mach numbers from 0.5 to 1.3 , 1970 .

[3]  D. E. Harrington,et al.  Performance of a collapsible plug nozzle having either two-position cylindrical or variable angle floating shrouds at Mach numbers from 0 to 2.0 , 1968 .

[4]  D. L. Bresnahan,et al.  Cold flow investigation of a low angle turbojet plug nozzle with fixed throat and translating shroud at Mach numbers from 0 to 2.0 , 1968 .

[5]  J. M. Cubbage,et al.  Drag of Conical and Circular-Arc Boattail Afterbodies at Mach Numbers From 0.6 to 1.3 , 1957 .

[6]  D. L. Bresnahan Performance of an aerodynamically positioned auxiliary inlet ejector nozzle at Mach numbers from 0 to 2.0 , 1970 .

[7]  F. W. Steffen Performance of a 10 deg conical plug nozzle with a stowed thrust reverser at Mach numbers from 0 to 2.0 , 1970 .

[8]  B. H. Anderson Factors which influence the analysis and design of ejector nozzles , 1972 .

[9]  J. R. Jones,et al.  Performance of a wind tunnel model of an aerodynamically positioned variable flap ejector at Mach numbers from 0 to 2.0 , 1968 .

[10]  G. D. Shrewsbury Effect of boattail juncture shape on pressure drag coefficients of isolated afterbodies , 1968 .

[11]  D. M. Straight,et al.  Experimental cold-flow evaluation of a ram air cooled plug nozzle concept for afterburning turbojet engines , 1973 .

[12]  A. L. Johns,et al.  Performance of a fixed geometry wind tunnel model of an auxiliary inlet ejector with a clamshell flow diverter from Mach 0 to 1.2 , 1970 .

[13]  D. L. Bresnahan Experimental investigation of a 10 deg conical turbojet plug nozzle with iris primary and translating shroud at Mach numbers from 0 to 2.0 , 1968 .

[14]  R. Chamberlin,et al.  Flight investigation of installation effects on a plug nozzle installed on an underwing nacelle , 1971 .

[15]  B. J. Blaha,et al.  Flight and wind tunnel investigation of installation effects on supersonic cruise exhaust nozzles at transonic speeds. , 1969 .

[16]  G. Rao Contoured Rocket Nozzles , 1959 .

[17]  D. L. Bresnahan,et al.  Static-test results from exhaust nozzles with novel features for supersonic-aircraft applications , 1966 .

[18]  A. B. Packman,et al.  Aerodynamic and acoustic tests of duct-burning turbofan exhaust nozzles , 1976 .

[19]  A. Lieberman Comparison of predicted and experimental wall temperatures for a cylindrical ejector exhaust nozzle operated with a turbojet gas generator , 1971 .

[20]  Joseph N. Sivo,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Rocket Exhaust Diffusers for Altitude Simulation , 1960 .

[21]  G. D. Shrewsbury Effect of a simulated wing on the pressure-drag coefficients of various 15 deg boattails at Mach numbers from 0.56 to 1.00 , 1968 .

[22]  R. Harris,et al.  An analysis and correlation of aircraft wave drag , 1964 .