Altering brain dynamics with transcranial random noise stimulation

Random noise can enhance the detectability of weak signals in nonlinear threshold systems, a phenomenon known as stochastic resonance (SR). This concept is not only applicable to single threshold systems but can also be applied to dynamical systems with multiple attractor states, such as observed during the phenomenon of binocular rivalry. Binocular rivalry can be characterized by marginally stable attractor states between which the brain switches in a spontaneous, stochastic manner. The switches are thought to be driven by a combination of neuronal adaptation and noise. Here we used a computational model to predict the effect of noise on perceptual dominance durations when either low-contrast or high-contrast stimuli are presented. Subsequently we compared the model prediction to a series of three experiments where we measured binocular rivalry dynamics when noise (zero-mean Gaussian white noise) was added either to the visual stimulus (Exp. 1) or directly to the visual cortex (Exp. 2 and Exp. 3) by applying transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS 1mA, 100-640 Hz zero mean Gaussian white noise). We found that adding noise significantly reduced the mixed percept duration (Exp. 1 and Exp. 2). This effect was only present for low-contrast but not for high-contrast visual stimuli which is in line with the model predictions. Our results demonstrate that both central and peripheral noise can influence state-switching dynamics of binocular rivalry under specific conditions (e.g. low visual contrast stimuli), in line with a SR-mechanism.

[1]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Thomas T. Imhoff,et al.  Noise-enhanced tactile sensation , 1996, Nature.

[3]  Richard H. A. H. Jacobs,et al.  The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[4]  J Overbaugh,et al.  Lymphokines modulate the growth and survival of thymic tumor cells containing a novel feline leukemia virus/Notch2 variant. , 1999, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[5]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  G. Davis,et al.  Low endogenous neural noise in autism , 2015, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[7]  M. Hollins,et al.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Massimo Riani,et al.  Visual Perception of Stochastic Resonance , 1997 .

[9]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Disrupting Parietal Function Prolongs Dominance Durations in Binocular Rivalry , 2010, Current Biology.

[10]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Peter Grigg,et al.  Noise-mediated enhancements and decrements in human tactile sensation , 1997 .

[12]  Luke D. Smillie,et al.  Seeing it both ways: Openness to experience and binocular rivalry suppression , 2017 .

[13]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Structural and functional fractionation of right superior parietal cortex in bistable perception , 2011, Current Biology.

[14]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[15]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[16]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Clinician Accessible Tools for GUI Computational Models of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: BONSAI and SPHERES , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  Géza Gergely Ambrus,et al.  Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: Comparison of tDCS and tRNS , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Frank Moss,et al.  Use of behavioural stochastic resonance by paddle fish for feeding , 1999, Nature.

[19]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Blake A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[21]  Christopher P. Said,et al.  Normal binocular rivalry in autism: Implications for the excitation/inhibition imbalance hypothesis , 2013, Vision Research.

[22]  V. Walsh,et al.  Right parietal TMS shortens dominance durations in binocular rivalry , 2010, Current Biology.

[23]  Guangxing Li,et al.  The effects of acute alcohol exposure on the response properties of neurons in visual cortex area 17 of cats. , 2010, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[24]  A. Antal,et al.  Evaluating Aftereffects of Short-Duration Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation on Cortical Excitability , 2011, Neural plasticity.

[25]  Para Kang,et al.  Acute Alcohol Drinking Promotes Piecemeal Percepts during Binocular Rivalry , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[26]  Derek Abbott,et al.  What Is Stochastic Resonance? Definitions, Misconceptions, Debates, and Its Relevance to Biology , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  J. Deans,et al.  Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[29]  Alexander B. Neiman,et al.  Stochastic resonance in psychophysics and in animal behavior , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[30]  Nicole Wenderoth,et al.  Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation of Visual Cortex: Stochastic Resonance Enhances Central Mechanisms of Perception , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  John Rinzel,et al.  Noise and adaptation in multistable perception: noise drives when to switch, adaptation determines percept choice. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[33]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[34]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Slower Rate of Binocular Rivalry in Autism , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[36]  A. Antal,et al.  Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High- Frequency Random Noise Stimulation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[37]  S. Schiff,et al.  Sensitivity of Neurons to Weak Electric Fields , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[39]  David J. Heeger,et al.  A Model of Binocular Rivalry and Cross-orientation Suppression , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[40]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Random Noise Stimulation Improves Neuroplasticity in Perceptual Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Santucci,et al.  Stochastic resonance in bistable systems. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[42]  M. Lankheet,et al.  Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[43]  Gregoire Nicolis,et al.  Stochastic resonance , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[44]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Human hearing enhanced by noise 1 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 23 May 2000. , 2000, Brain Research.

[45]  C. Clifford Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.

[46]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Stochastic Resonance Modulates Neural Synchronization within and between Cortical Sources , 2010, PloS one.

[48]  Yee-Joon Kim,et al.  Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[49]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[50]  Randolph Blake,et al.  The Role of Frontal and Parietal Brain Areas in Bistable Perception , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Konstantinos Moutoussis,et al.  Binocular rivalry alternations and their relation to visual adaptation , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[52]  E. Manjarrez,et al.  Stochastic resonance in human electroencephalographic activity elicited by mechanical tactile stimuli , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[53]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Report Experience-Driven Plasticity in Binocular Vision , 2010 .

[54]  Francesca Grassi,et al.  Noise Enhances Action Potential Generation in Mouse Sensory Neurons via Stochastic Resonance , 2016, PloS one.