Countering matrix effects in environmental liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry water analysis for endocrine disrupting chemicals.

In recent years, despite the increasing success of liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (MS), reports on matrix susceptibility have shown the limitations of the this powerful analytical technique. Matrix effects (MEs) result from co-eluting residual matrix components affecting the ionization efficiency of target analytes and can lead to erroneous results. The present work evaluates the matrix effect of environmental water samples on 35 endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in negative and positive LC-ESI-MS/MS. It was shown that mobile-phase additives could significantly influence matrix effects. Addition of acids resulted in a severe signal suppression (average ME%: <65%), and 1 mM ammonium formate increased the average ME% to 84%. The importance of an efficient sample clean-up and internal standardization also was demonstrated. Cleaner extracts resulted in reduced matrix effects (average ME%: 89%) and labeled internal standards proved to have a beneficial effect especially on signal reproducibility (average CV% 4.2% versus 2.6%). The results from the present work indicate that evaluation of matrix effects should become an integrated part of quantitative LC-ESI-MS/MS method development and validation.

[1]  X. Tong,et al.  Characterization of a technique for rapid pharmacokinetic studies of multiple co-eluting compounds by LC/MS/MS. , 1999, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[2]  J. Foley,et al.  Reduction in matrix-related signal suppression effects in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using on-line two-dimensional liquid chromatography. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  J. Henion,et al.  Determination of sulfa drugs in biological fluids by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. , 1982, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  J. Simal-Gándara,et al.  The Use of LC-MS in Studies of Migration from Food Contact Materials: A Review of Present Applications and Future Possibilities , 2002 .

[5]  W. Lambert,et al.  Pitfalls associated with liquid chromatography/electrospray tandem mass spectrometry in quantitative bioanalysis of drugs of abuse in saliva. , 2001, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[6]  P. Leonards,et al.  Ultra-trace-level determination of polar pesticides and their transformation products in surface and estuarine water samples using column liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  W. Lambert,et al.  Analysis of estrogenic contaminants in river water using liquid chromatography coupled to ion trap based mass spectrometry. , 2002, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[8]  M. Berna,et al.  Effects of flow rate on high-throughput quantitative analysis of protein-precipitated plasma using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. , 2002, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[9]  Timothy Olah,et al.  Mechanistic investigation of ionization suppression in electrospray ionization , 2000, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[10]  Shaolian Zhou,et al.  Effects of solvent composition on molecular ion response in electrospray mass spectrometry: Investigation of the ionization processes , 1995 .

[11]  P. Marquet Progress of Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry in Clinical and Forensic Toxicology , 2002, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[12]  J. V. Sancho,et al.  Different quantitation approaches for xenobiotics in human urine samples by liquid chromatography/electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. , 2002, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[13]  D. Hercules,et al.  LC-MS/MS signal suppression effects in the analysis of pesticides in complex environmental matrices , 2001, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[14]  H. Niederländer,et al.  Ion suppression in the determination of clenbuterol in urine by solid-phase extraction atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation ion-trap mass spectrometry. , 2003, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[15]  A. Bruins,et al.  Effect of solvent on dynamic range and sensitivity in pneumatically-assisted electrospray (ion spray) mass spectrometry , 1996 .

[16]  W. Weinmann,et al.  Ion suppression effects in liquid chromatography-electrospray-ionisation transport-region collision induced dissociation mass spectrometry with different serum extraction methods for systematic toxicological analysis with mass spectra libraries. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[17]  D. W. Ball,et al.  Rayleigh and Raman Scattering , 2001 .

[18]  J. V. Sancho,et al.  Study of matrix effects on the direct trace analysis of acidic pesticides in water using various liquid chromatographic modes coupled to tandem mass spectrometric detection. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[19]  J. Smeraglia,et al.  Matrix effects and selectivity issues in LC-MS-MS , 2002 .

[20]  P. Zoonen,et al.  Recent and future developments of liquid chromatography in pesticide trace analysis. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[21]  Walter A. Korfmacher,et al.  Quantitative screening and matrix effect studies of drug discovery compounds in monkey plasma using fast-gradient liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. , 2001, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[22]  U. Brinkman,et al.  Determination of polar pesticides with atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry using methanol and/or acetonitrile for solid-phase desorption and gradient liquid chromatography. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. A.

[23]  A. Laganà,et al.  Evaluation of a Method Based on Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray/Mass Spectrometry for Analyzing Carbamate Insecticides in Fruits and Vegetables , 1996 .

[24]  W. Niessen,et al.  The role of column liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry in environmental trace-level analysis. Determination and identification of pesticides in water , 2001 .

[25]  Walter A. Korfmacher,et al.  Investigation of matrix effects in bioanalytical high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric assays: application to drug discovery. , 2003, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[26]  J. T. Wu,et al.  Direct plasma sample injection in multiple-component LC-MS-MS assays for high-throughput pharmacokinetic screening. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  D L Buhrman,et al.  Quantitation of SR 27417 in human plasma using electrospray liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: A study of ion suppression , 1996, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[28]  E. Matsushima,et al.  Improvement in precision of the liquid chromatographic-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric analysis of 3'-C-ethynylcytidine in rat plasma. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[29]  B. Matuszewski,et al.  Matrix effect in quantitative LC/MS/MS analyses of biological fluids: a method for determination of finasteride in human plasma at picogram per milliliter concentrations. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  T. Olah,et al.  The effects of sample preparation methods on the variability of the electrospray ionization response for model drug compounds. , 1999, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[31]  D. Barceló,et al.  Analysis of ethoxylated nonionic surfactants and their metabolites by liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry. , 2001, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[32]  John B. Fenn,et al.  Electrospray ionization–principles and practice , 1990 .

[33]  E. Woolf,et al.  Effect of the sample matrix on the determination of indinavir in human urine by HPLC with turbo ion spray tandem mass spectrometric detection. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[34]  W. Lambert,et al.  Influence of the eluent composition on the ionization efficiency for morphine of pneumatically assisted electrospray, atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization and sonic spray. , 2002, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[35]  B. Matuszewski,et al.  Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC-MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[36]  A. Bruins Mechanistic aspects of electrospray ionization , 1998 .

[37]  S. Ito,et al.  Matrix effect and correction by standard addition in quantitative liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning toxins. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[38]  F. Dixon,et al.  Effect of high-performance liquid chromatography mobile phase components on sensitivity in negative atmospheric pressure chemical ionization liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry , 1996, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[39]  T. L. Lloyd,et al.  High-speed gradient parallel liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry with fully automated sample preparation for bioanalysis: 30 seconds per sample from plasma. , 2002, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[40]  C. Iden,et al.  Analysis of alkylphenol ethoxylate metabolites in the aquatic environment using liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.