Phantom somatosensory evoked potentials following selective intraneural electrical stimulation in two amputees

OBJECTIVE The aim of the paper is to objectively demonstrate that amputees implanted with intraneural interfaces are truly able to feel a sensation in the phantom hand by recording "phantom" somatosensory evoked potentials from the corresponding brain areas. METHODS We implanted four transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrodes, available with percutaneous connections to a multichannel electrical stimulator, in the median and ulnar nerves of two left trans-radial amputees. Two channels of the implants that were able to elicit sensations during intraneural nerve stimulation were chosen, in both patients, for recording somatosensory evoked potentials. RESULTS We recorded reproducible evoked responses by stimulating the median and the ulnar nerves in both cases. Latencies were in accordance with the arrival of somatosensory information to the primary somatosensory cortex. CONCLUSION Our results provide evidence that sensations generated by intraneural stimulation are truly perceived by amputees and located in the phantom hand. Moreover, our results strongly suggest that sensations perceived in different parts of the phantom hand result in different evoked responses. SIGNIFICANCE Somatosensory evoked potentials obtained by selective intraneural electrical stimulation in amputee patients are a useful tool to provide an objective demonstration of somatosensory feedback in new generation bidirectional prostheses.

[1]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[2]  A Mazzoni,et al.  Comparison of linear frequency and amplitude modulation for intraneural sensory feedback in bidirectional hand prostheses , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[3]  X. Navarro,et al.  Neural plasticity after peripheral nerve injury and regeneration , 2007, Progress in Neurobiology.

[4]  T. Stieglitz,et al.  A transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME) to interface with the peripheral nerve. , 2010, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[5]  P. Rossini,et al.  Characterization of multi-channel intraneural stimulation in transradial amputees , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[6]  K. Horch,et al.  Effects of short-term training on sensory and motor function in severed nerves of long-term human amputees. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Loredana Zollo,et al.  Restoring tactile sensations via neural interfaces for real-time force-and-slippage closed-loop control of bionic hands , 2019, Science Robotics.

[8]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[9]  Benoit P. Delhaye,et al.  The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[10]  David Guiraud,et al.  A distributed architecture for activating the peripheral nervous system , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems , 2005, Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS.

[12]  D. Burke,et al.  Excitability of human axons , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.