Augmentation Concepts with HUDs for Cyclists to Improve Road Safety in Shared Spaces

Exploiting the potential of automated vehicles and future traffic concepts like platooning or dynamic intersections requires the integration of human traffic participants. Recent research investigating how automated vehicles can communicate with other road users has focused mainly on pedestrians. We argue that cyclists are another important group of vulnerable road users that must be considered, as cycling is a vital transportation modality for a more sustainable future. Within this paper, we discuss the needs of cyclists and claim that their integration will demand to think of other concepts, which support moving communication partners. We further sketch potential approaches for augmented reality applications based on related work and present results of a pilot study aiming to evaluate and improve those. Initial findings show that people are open towards concepts that increase cyclist safety. However, it is key to present information clearly and unambiguously to produce a benefit.

[1]  Egils Ginters,et al.  Augmented reality use for cycling quality improvement , 2019, Procedia Computer Science.

[2]  John Parkin,et al.  Design speeds and acceleration characteristics of bicycle traffic for use in planning, design and appraisal , 2010 .

[3]  Kalaiselvi V.K.G.,et al.  Mission on! Innovations in bike systems to provide a safe ride based on IOT , 2017, 2017 2nd International Conference on Computing and Communications Technologies (ICCCT).

[4]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[6]  Andrii Matviienko,et al.  NaviBike: Comparing Unimodal Navigation Cues for Child Cyclists , 2019, CHI.

[7]  R. M. Taylor,et al.  Workload or Situational Awareness?: TLX vs. SART for Aerospace Systems Design Evaluation , 1991 .

[8]  Michael Fisher,et al.  Formal verification of autonomous vehicle platooning , 2016, Sci. Comput. Program..

[9]  Yahui Wang,et al.  To Cross or Not to Cross: Urgency-Based External Warning Displays on Autonomous Vehicles to Improve Pedestrian Crossing Safety , 2018, AutomotiveUI.

[10]  Frank Gaffikin,et al.  Creating Shared Public Space in the Contested City: The Role of Urban Design , 2010 .

[11]  E. Thompson Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) , 2007 .

[12]  Philipp Wintersberger,et al.  Fostering User Acceptance and Trust in Fully Automated Vehicles: Evaluating the Potential of Augmented Reality , 2018, PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality.

[13]  Chao Wang,et al.  Interface Concepts for Intent Communication from Autonomous Vehicles to Vulnerable Road Users , 2018, AutomotiveUI.

[14]  Jonas Andersson,et al.  Designing HMIs for an active safety system on bicycles , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[15]  Alexander G. Mirnig,et al.  Workshop on Communication between Automated Vehicles and Vulnerable Road Users , 2018, AutomotiveUI.

[16]  Azra Habibovic,et al.  SAV2P: Exploring the Impact of an Interface for Shared Automated Vehicles on Pedestrians' Experience , 2017, AutomotiveUI.

[17]  B. Hamilton-Baillie Shared Space: Reconciling People, Places and Traffic , 2008 .

[18]  David Sirkin,et al.  The Case for Implicit External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[19]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Understanding Bicycle Dynamics and Cyclist Behavior From Naturalistic Field Data (November 2012) , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Andreas Riener,et al.  How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians?: A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[21]  Shunsuke Aoki,et al.  Dynamic Intersections and Self-Driving Vehicles , 2018, 2018 ACM/IEEE 9th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS).

[22]  Fan Zhang,et al.  How to make more cycling good for road safety? , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Sowmya Somanath,et al.  Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction , 2018, CHI.

[24]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[25]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Cycling for Everyone , 2008 .