Augmentation Concepts with HUDs for Cyclists to Improve Road Safety in Shared Spaces
暂无分享,去创建一个
Philipp Wintersberger | Andreas Riener | Andreas Löcken | Anna-Katharina Frison | Tamara von Sawitzky | Anna-Katharina Frison | A. Riener | Philipp Wintersberger | Andreas Löcken
[1] Egils Ginters,et al. Augmented reality use for cycling quality improvement , 2019, Procedia Computer Science.
[2] John Parkin,et al. Design speeds and acceleration characteristics of bicycle traffic for use in planning, design and appraisal , 2010 .
[3] Kalaiselvi V.K.G.,et al. Mission on! Innovations in bike systems to provide a safe ride based on IOT , 2017, 2017 2nd International Conference on Computing and Communications Technologies (ICCCT).
[4] D. Watson,et al. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[5] Wendy Ju,et al. Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).
[6] Andrii Matviienko,et al. NaviBike: Comparing Unimodal Navigation Cues for Child Cyclists , 2019, CHI.
[7] R. M. Taylor,et al. Workload or Situational Awareness?: TLX vs. SART for Aerospace Systems Design Evaluation , 1991 .
[8] Michael Fisher,et al. Formal verification of autonomous vehicle platooning , 2016, Sci. Comput. Program..
[9] Yahui Wang,et al. To Cross or Not to Cross: Urgency-Based External Warning Displays on Autonomous Vehicles to Improve Pedestrian Crossing Safety , 2018, AutomotiveUI.
[10] Frank Gaffikin,et al. Creating Shared Public Space in the Contested City: The Role of Urban Design , 2010 .
[11] E. Thompson. Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) , 2007 .
[12] Philipp Wintersberger,et al. Fostering User Acceptance and Trust in Fully Automated Vehicles: Evaluating the Potential of Augmented Reality , 2018, PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality.
[13] Chao Wang,et al. Interface Concepts for Intent Communication from Autonomous Vehicles to Vulnerable Road Users , 2018, AutomotiveUI.
[14] Jonas Andersson,et al. Designing HMIs for an active safety system on bicycles , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[15] Alexander G. Mirnig,et al. Workshop on Communication between Automated Vehicles and Vulnerable Road Users , 2018, AutomotiveUI.
[16] Azra Habibovic,et al. SAV2P: Exploring the Impact of an Interface for Shared Automated Vehicles on Pedestrians' Experience , 2017, AutomotiveUI.
[17] B. Hamilton-Baillie. Shared Space: Reconciling People, Places and Traffic , 2008 .
[18] David Sirkin,et al. The Case for Implicit External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[19] Marco Dozza,et al. Understanding Bicycle Dynamics and Cyclist Behavior From Naturalistic Field Data (November 2012) , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[20] Andreas Riener,et al. How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians?: A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[21] Shunsuke Aoki,et al. Dynamic Intersections and Self-Driving Vehicles , 2018, 2018 ACM/IEEE 9th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS).
[22] Fan Zhang,et al. How to make more cycling good for road safety? , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[23] Sowmya Somanath,et al. Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction , 2018, CHI.
[24] Fred D. Davis,et al. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.
[25] Ralph Buehler,et al. Cycling for Everyone , 2008 .