Evaluation of external beam hardening filters on image quality of computed tomography and single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography

This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of external metal filters on the image quality of computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT images. Images of Jaszack phantom filled with water and containing iodine contrast filled syringes were acquired using CT (120 kV, 2.5 mA) component of SPECT/CT system, ensuring fixation of filter on X-ray collimator. Different thickness of filters of Al and Cu (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm) and filter combinations Cu 1 mm, Cu 2 mm, Cu 3 mm each in combination with Al (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm), respectively, were used. All image sets were visually analyzed for streak artifacts and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was derived. Similar acquisition was done using Philips CT quality control (QC) phantom and CNR were calculated for its lexan, perspex, and teflon inserts. Attenuation corrected SPECT/CT images of Jaszack phantom filled with 444–555 MBq (12–15 mCi) of 99mTc were obtained by applying attenuation correction map generated by hardened X-ray beam for different filter combination, on SPECT data. Uniformity, root mean square (rms) and contrast were calculated in all image sets. Less streak artifacts at iodine water interface were observed in images acquired using external filters as compared to those without a filter. CNR for syringes, spheres, and inserts of Philips CT QC phantom was almost similar to Al 2 mm, Al 3 mm, and without the use of filters. CNR decreased with increasing copper thickness and other filter combinations. Uniformity and rms were lower, and value of contrast was higher for SPECT/CT images when CT was acquired with Al 2 mm and 3 mm filter than for images acquired without a filter. The study suggests that for Infinia Hawkeye 4, SPECT/CT system, Al 2 mm, and 3 mm are the optimum filters for improving image quality of SPECT/CT images of Jaszack or Philips CT QC phantom keeping other parameters of CT constant.

[1]  W. Sensakovic,et al.  ACR testing of a dedicated head SPECT unit , 2014, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[2]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners. , 2013, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[3]  Pat Zanzonico,et al.  Basic Sciences of Nuclear Medicine. , 2011, Medical physics.

[4]  T. Turkington,et al.  SPECT/CT Physical Principles and Attenuation Correction* , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[5]  L. Goldman Principles of CT and CT Technology* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[6]  Mark T Madsen,et al.  Recent Advances in SPECT Imaging , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  J. O’Sullivan,et al.  MO‐D‐I‐611‐07: The Influence of Bowtie Filters On X‐Ray CT Signals , 2005 .

[8]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[9]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  M. O’Connor,et al.  A comparison of the uniformity requirements for SPECT image reconstruction using FBP and OSEM techniques. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[11]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Instrument- and computer-related problems and artifacts in nuclear medicine. , 1996, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[12]  L S Graham,et al.  Quantitation of SPECT performance: Report of Task Group 4, Nuclear Medicine Committee. , 1995, Medical physics.

[13]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Description of a prototype emission-transmission computed tomography imaging system. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  O. Lodge Production of X-Rays , 1896, Nature.

[15]  L. Aggarwal,et al.  A study to improve the image quality in low-dose computed tomography (SPECT) using filtration , 2011, Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India.

[16]  Natalie N. Braun,et al.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[17]  E. Shimosegawa,et al.  Effect of CT acquisition parameters in the detection of subtle hypoattenuation in acute cerebral infarction: a phantom study. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  T. Bateman,et al.  Attenuation correction single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2005, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[19]  C. Appledorn,et al.  Uniformity correction for SPECT using a mapped cobalt-57 sheet source. , 1985, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.