Earthquake risk assessment using an integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process with Artificial Neural Networks based on GIS: A case study of Sanandaj in Iran

Abstract Earthquakes are natural phenomena, which induce natural hazard that seriously threatens urban areas, despite significant advances in retrofitting urban buildings and enhancing the knowledge and ability of experts in natural disaster control. Iran is one of the most seismically active countries in the world. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and analyze the extent of earthquake vulnerability in relation to demographic, environmental, and physical criteria. An earthquake risk assessment (ERA) map was created by using a Fuzzy-Analytic Hierarchy Process coupled with an Artificial Neural Networks (FAHP-ANN) model generating five vulnerability classes. Combining the application of a FAHP-ANN with a geographic information system (GIS) enabled to assign weights to the layers of the earthquake vulnerability criteria. The model was applied to Sanandaj City in Iran, located in the seismically active Sanandaj-Sirjan zone which is frequently affected by devastating earthquakes. The Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) model was implemented in the IDRISI software and 250 points were validated for grades 0 and 1. The validation process revealed that the proposed model can produce an earthquake probability map with an accuracy of 95%. A comparison of the results attained by using a FAHP, AHP and MLP model shows that the hybrid FAHP-ANN model proved flexible and reliable when generating the ERA map. The FAHP-ANN model accurately identified the highest earthquake vulnerability in densely populated areas with dilapidated building infrastructure. The findings of this study are useful for decision makers with a scientific basis to develop earthquake risk management strategies.

[1]  H. Aghamohammadi,et al.  Seismic human loss estimation for an earthquake disaster using neural network , 2013, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[2]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: A comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models , 2012 .

[3]  H. Pourghasemi,et al.  An integrated artificial neural network model for the landslide susceptibility assessment of Osado Island, Japan , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[4]  Stefan Dech,et al.  Tsunami risk assessment in Indonesia , 2011 .

[5]  Reza Hassanzadeh,et al.  Interactive approach for GIS-based earthquake scenario development and resource estimation (Karmania hazard model) , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[6]  Ivan Marović,et al.  Methodology for Developing Hydrological Models Based on an Artificial Neural Network to Establish an Early Warning System in Small Catchments , 2016 .

[7]  Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of the Kermanshah-Sanandaj Region of Western Iran , 2007 .

[8]  Fatemeh Rezaie,et al.  Seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in Tehran city based on AHP and GIS , 2014 .

[9]  Mauricio Sánchez-Silva,et al.  Earthquake Damage Assessment Based on Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks , 2001 .

[10]  ASHIF PANAKKAT,et al.  Neural Network Models for Earthquake Magnitude Prediction Using Multiple seismicity Indicators , 2007, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[11]  Umi Kalthum Ngah,et al.  Determination of Important Topographic Factors for Landslide Mapping Analysis Using MLP Network , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[12]  Xu Xiwei Wenchuan Earthquake-induced Landslides:an Overview , 2010 .

[13]  Rujee Rodcha,et al.  Comparison of Cash Crop Suitability Assessment Using Parametric, AHP, and FAHP Methods , 2019, Land.

[14]  A. Zamani,et al.  Computer-based self-organized tectonic zoning revisited: Scientific criterion for determining the optimum number of zones , 2011 .

[15]  Jun Hu,et al.  Risk assessment of seismic hazards in hydraulic fracturing areas based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and AHP method (FAHP): A case analysis of Shangluo area in Yibin City, Sichuan Province, China , 2018, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[16]  Maghsoud Amiri,et al.  A fuzzy MCDM model with objective and subjective weights for evaluating service quality in hotel industries , 2013 .

[17]  Mohammad Reza Saradjian,et al.  A GIS-based approach for earthquake loss estimation based on the immediate extraction of damaged buildings , 2017 .

[18]  Chong Xu,et al.  GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China , 2012 .

[19]  B. Omidvar,et al.  Experimental vulnerability curves for the residential buildings of Iran , 2011, Natural Hazards.

[20]  Bakhtiar Feizizadeh,et al.  From a GIS-based hybrid site condition map to an earthquake damage assessment in Iran: Methods and trends , 2017 .

[21]  E. S. Karapidakis Machine learning for frequency estimation of power systems , 2007, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  Halûk Sucuoğlu,et al.  Seismic Hazard Assessment , 2014 .

[23]  Behzad Moshiri,et al.  EARTHQUAKE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR HOSPITAL BUILDINGS USING A GIS-BASED GROUP MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH: A CASE STUDY OF TEHRAN, IRAN , 2015 .

[24]  R. Hassanzadeh,et al.  A GIS-based seismic hazard, building vulnerability and human loss assessment for the earthquake scenario in Tabriz , 2014 .

[25]  Gholamhassan Najafi,et al.  Performance and exhaust emissions of a gasoline engine with ethanol blended gasoline fuels using artificial neural network , 2009 .

[26]  M. Ghafory-Ashtiany View of Islam on earthquakes, human vitality and disaster , 2009 .

[27]  K. Bargi,et al.  Stochastic modeling of Iranian earthquakes and estimation of ground motion for future earthquakes in Greater Tehran , 2009 .

[28]  Turan Erden,et al.  Analysis of earthquake parameters to generate hazard maps by integrating AHP and GIS for Küçükçekmece region , 2012 .

[29]  Chong Xu,et al.  Mapping earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility by use of artificial neural network (ANN) models: an example of the 2013 Minxian (China) Mw 5.9 event , 2018, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk.

[30]  J. C. de la Llera,et al.  An integrated model for earthquake risk assessment of buildings , 2002 .

[31]  R. K. Singh,et al.  A fuzzy TOPSIS based approach for e-sourcing , 2011, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[32]  Dominik H. Lang,et al.  Physical Vulnerability in Earthquake Risk Assessment , 2017 .

[33]  Burcu Gunes,et al.  Earthquake Response Spectra Models Incorporating Fuzzy Logic with Statistics , 2000 .

[34]  Yasamin O. Izadkhah,et al.  Developing a holistic model for earthquake risk assessment and disaster management interventions in urban fabrics , 2018 .

[35]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using Statistical- and Artificial Intelligence-Based FR-RF Integrated Model and Multiresolution DEMs , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[36]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Using fuzzy operators to address the complexity in decision making of water resources redistribution in two neighboring river basins , 2010 .

[37]  G. Ghodrati Amiri,et al.  SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF METROPOLITAN TEHRAN, IRAN , 2003 .

[38]  S. M. Akash,et al.  A Fuzzy-AHP Method for Selection Best Apparel Item to Start-Up with New Garment Factory: A Case Study in Bangladesh , 2018 .

[39]  H Stuart Post Earthquake Assessment of Building Damage , 1990 .

[40]  Filippos Vallianatos,et al.  Earthquake vulnerability and seismic risk assessment of urban areas in high seismic regions: application to Chania City, Crete Island, Greece , 2010 .

[41]  Nouma Izeboudjen,et al.  A new classification approach for neural networks hardware: from standards chips to embedded systems on chip , 2012, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[42]  F. Nadim,et al.  Earthquake Disaster Risk Reduction in Iran: Lessons and “Lessons Learned” from Three Large Earthquake Disasters—Tabas 1978, Rudbar 1990, and Bam 2003 , 2015, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.

[43]  M. Aghazadeh,et al.  A New Hybrid model of Multi-layer Perceptron Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithms in Web Design Management Based on CMS , 2018 .

[44]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Multi-hazard assessment modeling via multi-criteria analysis and GIS: a case study , 2019, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[45]  M R Asef Modelling the elements of country vulnerability to earthquake disasters. , 2008, Disasters.

[46]  Radhikesh P. Nanda,et al.  A GIS System Integrated with Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment of RC Building , 2018 .

[47]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2004, Appl. Soft Comput..

[48]  M. Wyss,et al.  Comparison of strain and stress tensor orientation: Application to Iran and southern California , 1995 .

[49]  Luis Martínez,et al.  A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information , 2015, 2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE).

[50]  Ali A. Alesheikh,et al.  Developing an Agent-Based Simulation System for Post-Earthquake Operations in Uncertainty Conditions: A Proposed Method for Collaboration among Agents , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[51]  PradhanBiswajeet,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis , 2010 .

[52]  Debarati Guha-Sapir,et al.  Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2009The numbers and trends , 2010 .

[53]  J. Mendes,et al.  Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment: case study of the historic city centre of Coimbra, Portugal , 2011 .

[54]  C. Fergusson,et al.  Dextral transpression in Late Cretaceous continental collision, Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, western Iran , 2000 .

[55]  Mirko Corigliano,et al.  Seismic Risk Assessment of Italian Seaports Using GIS , 2008 .

[56]  M. R. Delavar,et al.  Tehran’s seismic vulnerability classification using granular computing approach , 2011 .

[57]  R. Hassanzadeh Earthquake population loss estimation using spatial modelling and survey data: The Bam earthquake, 2003, Iran , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[58]  Anuar Ahmad,et al.  Land suitability procedure for sustainable citrus planning using the application of the analytical network process approach and GIS , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[59]  M. Najafi,et al.  Demographic Determinants of Disaster Preparedness Behaviors Amongst Tehran Inhabitants, Iran , 2015, PLoS currents.

[60]  Adnan Sözen,et al.  Turkey's net energy consumption , 2005 .

[61]  Jia Zeng-ke The Study on Assessment Index of Urban Social Vulnerability to Earthquake Disaster , 2010 .

[62]  Gerrit Hansen,et al.  Loss and damage attribution , 2013 .

[63]  Sonia Chardonnel,et al.  Risk perception and social vulnerability to earthquakes in Grenoble (French Alps) , 2010 .

[64]  Peng He,et al.  Risk assessment model of expansive soil slope stability based on Fuzzy-AHP method and its engineering application , 2018 .

[65]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[66]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis — a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case ☆ , 2000 .

[67]  Sucharita Gopal,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks in Geospatial Analysis , 2016 .

[68]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  A Comparative Study of Statistics-Based Landslide Susceptibility Models: A Case Study of the Region Affected by the Gorkha Earthquake in Nepal , 2019, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[69]  Xiao-hong Chen,et al.  Social vulnerability assessment of earthquake disaster based on the catastrophe progression method: A Sichuan Province case study , 2017 .

[71]  Rifat Gürcan Özdemir,et al.  A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[72]  Najmeh Neysani Samany,et al.  Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban buildings and traffic networks using fuzzy ordered weighted average , 2019, Journal of Mountain Science.

[73]  Michael Y. Hu,et al.  Forecasting with artificial neural networks: The state of the art , 1997 .

[74]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Artificial neural network analysis of world green energy use , 2007 .

[75]  Milan Despotovic,et al.  Comparison of classical statistical methods and artificial neural network in traffic noise prediction , 2014 .

[76]  Behzad Moshiri,et al.  A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for seismic vulnerability assessment using quantifier-guided OWA operator: a case study of Tehran, Iran , 2015, Ann. GIS.

[77]  B. Pradhan,et al.  GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[78]  Juanjuan Xu,et al.  A Kind of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Neural Network Integrated Evaluation Method of Teaching , 2016 .

[79]  M. H. Abokharima,et al.  Land subsidence susceptibility mapping at Kinta Valley (Malaysia) using the evidential belief function model in GIS , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[80]  Saeed Abdolshah,et al.  Developing a computer vision method based on AHP and feature ranking for ores type detection , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[81]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[82]  Shu-Hsien Liao,et al.  Expert system methodologies and applications - a decade review from 1995 to 2004 , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[83]  K. Balakannan,et al.  MCDM Tools Application for Selection of Suppliers in Manufacturing Industries Using AHP, Fuzzy Logic and ANN , 2015 .

[84]  Xinglin Lei,et al.  A new fault rupture scenario for the 2003 Mw 6.6 Bam earthquake, SE Iran: Insights from the high-resolution QuickBird imagery and field observations , 2007 .

[85]  Alik Ismail-Zadeh,et al.  Scenario-based earthquake hazard and risk assessment for Baku (Azerbaijan) , 2010 .

[86]  Yunna Wu,et al.  Risk assessment on offshore photovoltaic power generation projects in China based on a fuzzy analysis framework , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[87]  S. Doocy,et al.  The Human Impact of Earthquakes: a Historical Review of Events 1980-2009 and Systematic Literature Review , 2013, PLoS currents.

[88]  R. El Hamdouni,et al.  LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF OUDKA, NORTHERN MOROCCO: A COMPARISON BETWEEN LOGISTIC REGRESSION AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS MODELS , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[89]  M. Allen,et al.  Right-lateral shear across Iran and kinematic change in the Arabia—Eurasia collision zone , 2009 .

[90]  S. Kanae,et al.  Estimating monthly total nitrogen concentration in streams by using artificial neural network. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[91]  Murat Kankal,et al.  Modeling and forecasting of Turkey's energy consumption using socio-economic and demographic variables , 2011 .

[92]  R. Ali Abbaspour,et al.  EXPLOITATION OF MCDA TO LEARN THE RADIAL BASE NEURAL NETWORK (RBFNN) AIM PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS VERSUS THE EARTHQUAKE (CASE STUDY: SANANDAJ CITY, IRAN) , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[93]  Bakhtiar Feizizadeh,et al.  Spatially explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for multicriteria-based vulnerability assessment , 2017 .

[94]  Farhad Hosseinali,et al.  Agent-based modeling of urban land-use development, case study: Simulating future scenarios of Qazvin city , 2013 .

[95]  Adnan Sözen,et al.  Forecasting based on sectoral energy consumption of GHGs in Turkey and mitigation policies , 2007 .

[96]  Mustafa Neamah Jebur,et al.  Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS , 2014 .

[97]  Rajnish Kumar,et al.  Supplier selection of an Indian heavy locomotive manufacturer: An integrated approach using Taguchi loss function, TOPSIS, and AHP , 2019, IIMB Management Review.

[98]  Mohammad Reza Ghassemi Surface ruptures of the Iranian earthquakes 1900–2014: Insights for earthquake fault rupture hazards and empirical relationships , 2016 .

[99]  Ali Mansourkhaki,et al.  A neural network noise prediction model for Tehran urban roads , 2018 .

[100]  D. M. Bachmanov,et al.  Active faults in the Zagros and central Iran , 2004 .

[101]  Ryuzo Ohno,et al.  A GIS-base exploration of the relationships between open space systems and urban form for the adaptive capacity of cities after an earthquake: The cases of two Chilean cities , 2014 .

[102]  Mark Pelling,et al.  Disaster Risk Reduction: Cases from Urban Africa , 2008 .

[103]  Mohsen Ghafory-Ashtiany,et al.  Toward quantification of seismic resilience in Iran: Developing an integrated indicator system , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[104]  Zekâi Sen Rapid visual earthquake hazard evaluation of existing buildings by fuzzy logic modeling , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[105]  Seismic Versus Aseismic Deformation in Iran Inferred from GPS and Seismicity Data , 2003 .

[106]  Mohammad Ali Nekooie,et al.  An improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS approach to identify endangered earthquake-induced buildings , 2018, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[107]  Mohammad Kazem Jafari,et al.  RECOGNITION OF VULNERABLE URBAN FABRICS IN EARTHQUAKE ZONES: A CASE STUDY OF THE TEHRAN METROPOLITAN AREA , 2009 .

[108]  Artur Karczmarczyk,et al.  Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection , 2018, Omega.

[109]  Galen D. Newman,et al.  Climate Change Preparedness: Comparing Future Urban Growth and Flood Risk in Amsterdam and Houston. , 2019, Sustainability.

[110]  Chong Xu,et al.  Preparation of earthquake-triggered landslide inventory maps using remote sensing and GIS technologies: Principles and case studies , 2015 .

[111]  Norita B. Ahmad,et al.  Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Construct a Measure of the Magnitude of Consequences Component of Moral Intensity , 2009 .

[112]  John R. Weeks,et al.  Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[113]  Haeryip Sihombing,et al.  Norm-dist Monte-Carlo integrative method for the improvement of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2020, Heliyon.

[114]  Leonid Tchertov On spatial modelling , 2015 .

[115]  G. Ghodrati Amiri,et al.  Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Sanandaj, Iran , 2009 .

[116]  Aman Jantan,et al.  State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey , 2018, Heliyon.

[117]  Bing Li,et al.  Dynamic multi-attribute decision making model based on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers , 2011 .

[118]  Kamal Ahmed,et al.  Multilayer perceptron neural network for downscaling rainfall in arid region: A case study of Baluchistan, Pakistan , 2015, Journal of Earth System Science.

[119]  Mahdi Safa,et al.  Determination and Modelling of Energy Consumption in Wheat Production Using Neural Networks , 2011 .

[120]  Esfandiar Zebardast,et al.  Constructing a social vulnerability index to earthquake hazards using a hybrid factor analysis and analytic network process (F’ANP) model , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[121]  Mahdi Hashemi,et al.  A GIS-based earthquake damage assessment and settlement methodology , 2011 .

[122]  Mustafa Neamah Jebur,et al.  Earthquake induced landslide susceptibility mapping using an integrated ensemble frequency ratio and logistic regression models in West Sumatera Province, Indonesia , 2014 .

[123]  Chin-Tsai Lin,et al.  Evaluating digital video recorder systems using analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[124]  M. J. Kamelifar,et al.  A Comparative Study on Physical Vulnerability of Urban Area against Natural Hazards: Importance of Health Promoting Approach in Civil Engineering. , 2014, Health promotion perspectives.

[125]  Mohamad Molaei Qelichi,et al.  A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate the Sustainability Indicators in the Villagers’ Lives in Iran with Emphasis on Earthquake Hazard: A Case Study , 2017 .

[126]  DağdevirenMetin,et al.  Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC) , 2010 .

[127]  Hadi Bahadori,et al.  Development of an integrated model for seismic vulnerability assessment of residential buildings: Application to Mahabad City, Iran , 2017 .

[128]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[129]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[130]  Yi Peng,et al.  Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods , 2015, Ann. Oper. Res..

[131]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[132]  Ahmed Mebarki,et al.  Post-earthquake assessment of buildings damage using fuzzy logic , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[133]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on neural fuzzy inference model and metaheuristic optimization for flood susceptibilitgy modeling in a high-frequency tropical cyclone area using GIS , 2016 .

[134]  Mehedi Ahmed Ansary,et al.  GIS based mapping of vulnerability to earthquake and fire hazard in Dhaka city, Bangladesh , 2015 .

[135]  Hossein Nazmfar,et al.  An integrated approach of the analytic network process and fuzzy model mapping of evaluation of urban vulnerability against earthquake , 2019, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk.

[136]  Reza Hosnavi,et al.  Urban vulnerability under various blast loading scenarios: Analysis using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis techniques , 2018 .

[137]  Robin Spence,et al.  Earthquake Risk Modelling , 2006 .

[138]  M. Pelling,et al.  Determinants of risk: Exposure and vulnerability , 2012 .

[139]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  A Spatial Ensemble Model for Rockfall Source Identification From High Resolution LiDAR Data and GIS , 2019, IEEE Access.

[140]  Juan Miguel Sánchez-Lozano,et al.  Environmental management of Natura 2000 network areas through the combination of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. Case study in south-eastern Spain , 2017 .

[141]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making Problems with Unbalanced Fuzzy Linguistic Information , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[142]  A. Roli Artificial Neural Networks , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[143]  M. E. Banihabib,et al.  Bayesian network model for flood forecasting based on atmospheric ensemble forecasts , 2019, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.

[144]  Delineation of potential seismic sources for seismic zoning of Iran , 1999 .

[145]  Ali Akbar Safavi,et al.  Application of neural network and ANFIS model for earthquake occurrence in Iran , 2013, Earth Science Informatics.

[146]  Yifan Wang,et al.  Application of AHP and EIE in Reliability Analysis of Complex Production Lines Systems , 2019, Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

[147]  M. Monsalve,et al.  Risk and Resilience Monitor: Development of multiscale and multilevel indicators for disaster risk management for the communes and urban areas of Chile , 2018 .

[148]  Omar D. Cardona,et al.  Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area , 2010 .

[149]  B. Tavakoli,et al.  Seismic hazard assessment of Iran , 1999 .

[150]  Ashraf Ayoub,et al.  Fuzzy logic-based attenuation relationships of strong motion earthquake records , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[151]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  A Hybrid Analytic Network Process and Artificial Neural Network (ANP-ANN) Model for Urban Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[152]  Somnath Mukhopadhyay,et al.  A polynomial time algorithm for the construction and training of a class of multilayer perceptrons , 1993, Neural Networks.

[153]  I. Yilmaz Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine , 2010 .

[154]  K. P. Sudheer,et al.  Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: Current status and future directions , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[155]  Manoj K. Arora,et al.  Prediction of seismicity cycles in the Himalayas using artificial neural network , 2005 .

[156]  Francisco Martínez-Álvarez,et al.  Earthquake prediction model using support vector regressor and hybrid neural networks , 2018, PloS one.

[157]  S. Doocy,et al.  The Human Impact of Tsunamis: a Historical Review of Events 1900-2009 and Systematic Literature Review , 2013, PLoS currents.

[158]  Rodrigo Salas,et al.  Assessing Seismic Hazard in Chile Using Deep Neural Networks , 2019, Natural Hazards - Risk, Exposure, Response, and Resilience.

[159]  A M Kellerer,et al.  Risk perception , 1993, Nature.

[160]  Ercan Aksoy,et al.  Artificial neural network model for earthquake prediction with radon monitoring. , 2009, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[161]  Ajith Abraham,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks , 2005 .

[162]  G. Kabir,et al.  Prioritization of drivers of corporate social responsibility in the footwear industry in an emerging economy: A fuzzy AHP approach , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[163]  L. Medsker,et al.  Neural network applications in physics , 2001, IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222).

[164]  L. Costenaro,et al.  Modular structure of the full-length DNA gyrase B subunit revealed by small-angle X-ray scattering. , 2007, Structure.

[165]  Zahari Taha,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE decision support system for machine tool selection in flexible manufacturing cell , 2011, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[166]  Mehrbakhsh Nilashi,et al.  Determining the importance of Hospital Information System adoption factors using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP) , 2016 .

[167]  M. Panahi,et al.  Social Vulnerability Assessment Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Model for Earthquake Hazard in Tabriz City, Iran , 2018, Sustainability.

[168]  Rachel A. Davidson EERI Annual Student Paper Award a Multidisciplinary Urban Earthquake Disaster Risk Index , 1997 .

[169]  Mongkut Piantanakulchai,et al.  Analytic network process model for landslide hazard zonation , 2006 .

[170]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Land suitability analysis for Tabriz County, Iran: a multi-criteria evaluation approach using GIS , 2013 .

[171]  Zhikun Ding,et al.  Combining AHP-Entropy Approach with GIS for Construction Waste Landfill Selection—A Case Study of Shenzhen , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[172]  Benyong Wei,et al.  Risk assessment of people trapped in earthquake based on km grid: a case study of the 2014 Ludian earthquake, China , 2017 .

[173]  Juan Manuel Campos Benítez,et al.  Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry , 2007 .

[174]  A. Alesheikh,et al.  Spatial Modelling of Urban Physical Vulnerability to Explosion Hazards Using GIS and Fuzzy MCDA , 2017 .

[175]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[176]  Chang-Guk Sun,et al.  Development and application of a GIS-based tool for earthquake-induced hazard prediction , 2008 .

[177]  Frederic Masson,et al.  Seismic versus aseismic deformation in Iran inferred from earthquakes and geodetic data , 2004 .

[178]  Semih Ergintav,et al.  A GIS model for settlement suitability regarding disaster mitigation, a case study in Bolu Turkey , 2008 .

[179]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Model for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment (SVA) of Urban Residential Buildings , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[180]  Adnan Sözen,et al.  Future projection of the energy dependency of Turkey using artificial neural network , 2009 .

[181]  Tahere Yaghoobi,et al.  Prioritizing key success factors of software projects using fuzzy AHP , 2018, J. Softw. Evol. Process..

[182]  A. Mohammadi,et al.  Recognition of urban unsustainability in Iran (case study: Sanandaj city) , 2015 .

[183]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Introduction Neural networks in remote sensing , 1997 .

[184]  Iman Nasiri Aghdam,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping using an ensemble statistical index (Wi) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model at Alborz Mountains (Iran) , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[185]  Fatemeh Rezaie,et al.  GIS modeling of seismic vulnerability of residential fabrics considering geotechnical, structural, social and physical distance indicators in Tehran using multi-criteria decision-making techniques , 2014 .

[186]  Vice President,et al.  An Introduction to Expert Systems , 1989 .

[187]  M. Berberian The 2003 Bam Urban Earthquake: A Predictable Seismotectonic Pattern along the Western Margin of the Rigid Lut Block, Southeast Iran , 2005 .

[188]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Three Nonlinear Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Coal Mine Area , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[189]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria approach to flood risk vulnerability in South Korea by considering climate change impacts , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[190]  Saleh M. Al-Alawi,et al.  Forecasting monthly electric load and energy for a fast growing utility using an artificial neural network , 1995 .

[191]  Ghassan Beydoun,et al.  Integrated model for earthquake risk assessment using neural network and analytic hierarchy process: Aceh province, Indonesia , 2020, Geoscience Frontiers.

[192]  Mastura Jaafar,et al.  City Development Strategies (CDS) and Sustainable Urbanization in Developing World , 2012 .

[193]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[194]  Lee Saro,et al.  The spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility applying artificial neural network and logistic regression models: A case study of Inje, Korea , 2016 .

[195]  Huidong Jin,et al.  Risk assessment of earthquake network public opinion based on global search BP neural network , 2019, PloS one.

[196]  Davor Z Antanasijević,et al.  PM(10) emission forecasting using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm input variable optimization. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[197]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree , 2016, Landslides.

[198]  Mauricio Sa´nchez‐Silva,et al.  Earthquake Damage Assessment Based on Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks , 2001 .

[199]  Gilles Notton,et al.  Estimation of 5-min time-step data of tilted solar global irradiation using ANN (Artificial Neural Network) model , 2014 .

[200]  Wei Chen,et al.  GIS-based landslide susceptibility modelling: a comparative assessment of kernel logistic regression, Naïve-Bayes tree, and alternating decision tree models , 2017 .

[201]  Martin T. Hagan,et al.  Neural network design , 1995 .

[202]  Syed Ainuddin,et al.  Community resilience framework for an earthquake prone area in Baluchistan , 2012 .

[203]  Shuanggen Jin,et al.  Anomalous seismo-LAI variations potentially associated with the 2017 Mw = 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake from Swarm satellites, GPS-TEC and climatological data , 2019, Advances in Space Research.

[204]  W. Adger,et al.  A science of loss , 2016 .

[205]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely-sensed multi-spectral imagery , 1995 .

[206]  Penjani Hopkins Nyimbili,et al.  Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS for earthquake hazard analysis , 2018, Natural Hazards.

[207]  M. E. Banihabib,et al.  Bayesian network model for flood forecasting based on atmospheric ensemble forecasts , 2019, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.

[208]  Huicong Jia,et al.  Resilience to natural hazards: a geographic perspective , 2010 .

[209]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia , 2010 .

[210]  P. Simpson,et al.  Reassurance or reason for concern: Security forces as a crisis management strategy , 2016 .

[211]  Abbas Khashei-Siuki,et al.  Comparison of AHP and FAHP methods in determining suitable areas for drinking water harvesting in Birjand aquifer. Iran , 2020 .

[212]  Mahdi Bitarafan,et al.  Evaluating the connecting members of cold-formed steel structures in reconstruction of earthquake-prone areas in Iran using the AHP methods , 2013 .

[213]  A. Ohgai,et al.  A GIS-based Support Tool for Exploring Land Use Policy Considering Future Depopulation and Urban Vulnerability to Natural Disasters – A Case Study of Toyohashi City, Japan - , 2014 .

[214]  D. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Artificial neural network and liquefaction susceptibility assessment: a case study using the 2001 Bhuj earthquake data, Gujarat, India , 2008 .

[215]  K. Ikemura Development and application , 1971 .

[216]  Jobin Thomas,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis for delineation of groundwater potential zones in a tropical river basin using remote sensing, GIS and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) , 2020 .

[217]  X. Ding,et al.  Flood risk assessment based on hydrodynamic model and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation with GIS technique , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[218]  Runqiu Huang,et al.  GIS modelling of earthquake damage zones using satellite remote sensing and DEM data , 2012 .

[219]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models , 2010 .

[220]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Prioritizing disaster-prone areas for large-scale earthquakes' preparedness: Methodology and application , 2019, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.

[221]  Ehrenfried Lepuschitz,et al.  Geographic information systems in mountain risk and disaster management , 2015 .

[222]  Xiang-Sun Zhang,et al.  Introduction to Artificial Neural Network , 2000 .

[223]  Mengliang Yu,et al.  Mine landslide susceptibility assessment using IVM, ANN and SVM models considering the contribution of affecting factors , 2019, PloS one.

[224]  M. L. Carreño,et al.  Evaluation of social context integrated into the study of seismic risk for urban areas , 2016 .

[225]  Işık Yilmaz,et al.  A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks , 2009 .