Spatial patterns of plant association in grazed and ungrazed shrublands in the semi‐arid Karoo, South Africa

. The investigation of vegetation pattern and plant association by spatial statistics has become increasingly popular among plant ecologists. Recently, Individual-centered analysis (ICA) has been introduced as a new tool for analysis of multi-species co-occurrence patterns. We tested this new technique by applying it to spatial data from grazed and ungrazed shrub communities in the semi-arid Great Karoo, South Africa. There were substantial but complex and scale-dependent differences in pattern between grazed and ungrazed vegetation. Unpalatable species that increase in abundance in grazed vegetation possibly play a key role in the change of vegetation pattern. At small scales we found indications of aggregation (< 30 cm) at the ungrazed, but of repulsion (30 – 40 cm) at the grazed site. An additional non-random pattern at 60 – 170 cm at the grazed site was probably due to the clumped distributions of some species on broader scales. We show that the interpretability of ICA results is improved when the actual observed and expected frequencies of species combinations are added to the program output. The main strength of ICA is that it has the potential to detect association patterns that involve more than two species.

[1]  S. Milton,et al.  TIERBERG KAROO RESEARCH CENTRE: HISTORY, PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT, FLORA AND FAUNA , 1992 .

[2]  G. E. Russell.  List of species of southern African plants , 1984 .

[3]  J F Reynolds,et al.  Biological Feedbacks in Global Desertification , 1990, Science.

[4]  H. Gitay,et al.  Does niche limitation exist , 1987 .

[5]  János Podani,et al.  Individual-centered analysis of mapped point patterns representing multi-species assemblages , 1997 .

[6]  C. Skarpe.  Spatial patterns and dynamics of woody vegetation in an arid savanna , 1991 .

[7]  B. Ripley.  Spatial Point Pattern Analysis in Ecology , 1987 .

[8]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Community Assembly Rules, Morphological Dispersion, and the Coexistence of Plant Species , 1998 .

[9]  J. Wilson.  Variance in species richness, niche limitation, and vindication of patch models , 1995 .

[10]  János Podani,et al.  Multivariate data analysis in ecology and systematics: a methodological guide to the SYN-TAX 5.0 package , 1994 .

[11]  S. Milton,et al.  Population Dynamics, Disturbance, and Pattern Evolution: Identifying the Fundamental Scales of Organization in a Model Ecosystem , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Raphaël Pélissier,et al.  On explicit formulas of edge effect correction for Ripley's K‐function , 1999 .

[13]  D. Milchunas,et al.  Quantitative Effects of Grazing on Vegetation and Soils Over a Global Range of Environments , 1993 .

[14]  P. Haase.  Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: Introduction and methods of edge correction , 1995 .

[15]  J. Lawton.  Are there general laws in ecology , 1999 .

[16]  J A Drake,et al.  Communities as assembled structures: Do rules govern pattern? , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Paul H. Harvey,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1983 .

[18]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  A demonstration of guild-based assembly rules for a plant community, and determination of intrinsic guilds , 1994 .

[19]  S. Milton,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Arid Rangeland Degradation , 1994 .

[20]  János Podani,et al.  Individual-centered analysis of community pattern: Some case studies , 1998 .

[21]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  A Simulation Model for Shrub Ecosystem in the Semiarid Karoo, South Africa , 1995 .

[22]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion : new questions from old patterns , 1995 .

[23]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Community structure in a desert perennial community , 1994 .