Saccade adaptation specific to visual context.

When saccades consistently overshoot their targets, saccade amplitudes gradually decrease, thereby maintaining accuracy. This adaptive process has been seen as a form of motor learning that copes with changes in physical parameters of the eye and its muscles, brought about by aging or pathology. One would not expect such a motor-repair mechanism to be specific to the visual properties of the target stimulus. We had subjects make saccades to sudden movements of either of two targets-a steadily illuminated circle or a flickering circle-one of which stepped back during each saccade it elicited, simulating the effect of a hypermetric saccade. Saccade gain (saccade amplitude/target amplitude) decreased by 15% for the target that stepped back versus 6% for the target that did not step back. Most of the change in gain between successive blocks of trials of each type occurred on the first saccade of the block, decreasing by 0.12 on the first trial of a step-back block and increasing by 0.1 on the first trial of a no-step-back block. The differential adaptation of the two targets required postsaccadic feedback of both target types, as shown in a separate experiment, in which saccades to only one target received feedback, and the gain did not differ between the two target types. This demonstration that a context defined by a visual stimulus can serve as an effective cue for switching saccade gain between states suggests that saccade adaptation may have a heretofore unsuspected dimension of adaptability.

[1]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Effect of saccadic adaptation on localization of visual targets. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Mark Shelhamer,et al.  Sensory, motor, and combined contexts for context-specific adaptation of saccade gain in humans , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  Dara S. Manoach,et al.  Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  M. Desmurget,et al.  Self-generated saccades do not modify the gain of adapted reactive saccades , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Wilsaan M. Joiner,et al.  Adaptive Control of Saccades via Internal Feedback , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Boyden,et al.  Selective Engagement of Plasticity Mechanisms for Motor Memory Storage , 2006, Neuron.

[7]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. 3. Cells discharging before eye movements. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Comparing switch costs: alternating runs and explicit cuing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  H. Deubel.  Is saccadic adaptation context-specific? , 1995 .

[10]  E. Boyden,et al.  Cerebellum-dependent learning: the role of multiple plasticity mechanisms. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  D. Pelisson,et al.  Separate Neural Substrates in the Human Cerebellum for Sensory-motor Adaptation of Reactive and of Scanning Voluntary Saccades , 2008, The Cerebellum.

[12]  Jean-Louis Vercher,et al.  Adaptation of voluntary saccades, but not of reactive saccades, transfers to hand pointing movements. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Generalization of Motor Learning Depends on the History of Prior Action , 2006, PLoS biology.

[14]  A. Opstal,et al.  Transfer of short-term adaptation in human saccadic eye movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  H Deubel,et al.  Adaptive gain control of saccadic eye movements. , 1986, Human neurobiology.

[16]  M. Banks,et al.  How does saccade adaptation affect visual perception? , 2008, Journal of vision.

[17]  Harold E. Bedell,et al.  Changes in oculocentric visual direction induced by the recalibration of saccades , 1988, Vision Research.

[18]  C. Scudder,et al.  Comparison of two methods of producing adaptation of saccade size and implications for the site of plasticity. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Denis Pélisson,et al.  Long-lasting modifications of saccadic eye movements following adaptation induced in the double-step target paradigm. , 2005, Learning & memory.

[20]  S. C. Mclaughlin.  Parametric adjustment in saccadic eye movements , 1967 .

[21]  T. Collins,et al.  Saccadic adaptation depends on object selection: Evidence from between- and within-object saccadic eye movements , 2007, Brain Research.

[22]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Saccadic gain modification: visual error drives motor adaptation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm? , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  F A Miles,et al.  Visually induced adaptive changes in primate saccadic oculomotor control signals. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Denis Pélisson,et al.  Oculomotor plasticity: Are mechanisms of adaptation for reactive and voluntary saccades separate? , 2007, Brain Research.

[26]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Flexibility of saccade adaptation in the monkey: different gain states for saccades in the same direction , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  W. B. Templeton,et al.  Saccadic plasticity: parametric adaptive control by retinal feedback. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  T Vilis,et al.  Adaptation of saccadic and vestibulo-ocular systems after extraocular muscle tenectomy. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  Selective adaptation of internally triggered saccades made to visual targets , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Mark Shelhamer,et al.  Acquisition of context-specific adaptation is enhanced with rest intervals between changes in context state, suggesting a new form of motor consolidation , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  Mark J Wagner,et al.  Shared Internal Models for Feedforward and Feedback Control , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  F R Robinson,et al.  Visual error is the stimulus for saccade gain adaptation. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  E Kowler,et al.  Illusory shifts in visual direction accompany adaptation of saccadic eye movements , 1999, Nature.

[34]  Denis Pélisson,et al.  Eye position specificity of saccadic adaptation. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  F. Robinson,et al.  Non-visual information does not drive saccade gain adaptation in monkeys , 2002, Brain Research.

[36]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  A. Fuchs,et al.  The characteristics and neuronal substrate of saccadic eye movement plasticity , 2004, Progress in Neurobiology.

[38]  L. Optican,et al.  Adaptive response to ocular muscle weakness in human pursuit and saccadic eye movements. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  L. Optican,et al.  Cerebellar-dependent adaptive control of primate saccadic system. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  J. Vercher,et al.  SHORT TERM ADAPTIVE MODIFICATION OF SACCADIC AMPLITUDE , 1987 .

[42]  O. Bock,et al.  Transfer of adaptation between ocular saccades and arm movements. , 2008, Human movement science.

[43]  Mark Shelhamer,et al.  Context-specific adaptation of saccade gain , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Masahiko Fujita,et al.  Selective and delay adaptation of human saccades. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  H. Deubel.  Separate adaptive mechanisms for the control of reactive and volitional saccadic eye movements , 1995, Vision Research.