Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans.

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at the frequency of 2f1-f2 were measured in one or both ears of 12 young adults during 4 test sessions over a 6-week period. The purpose was to determine the variability in DPOAE amplitudes and 'detection thresholds' over repeated measurements using a computer-based time-averaging system. DPOAEs were generated with f1 and f2 relative to (f1f2)1/2 in two basic paradigms: (a) fixed levels of L1 = L2 of 70 and 55 dB SPL over a stimulus range from 0.8 to 8 kHz in 0.2-octave intervals; (b) input-output functions in stimulus regions of 0.8, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 6 kHz, L1 from 35 to 70 dB SPL changing in 5-dB steps and L2 at 6 dB below the amplitude of L1. The mean variability of DPOAE amplitudes with equilevel stimuli was 1.8 dB (SD = 1.8) for L1 = 70 dB SPL and 2.9 dB (SD = 2.7) for L1 = 55 dB SPL. It was 1.7 dB (SD = 1.7) and 2.4 dB (SD = 2.0) for comparable levels of L1 with L2 at 6 dB below L1. Variability in amplitude of the DPOAEs for the fixed-level condition was greatest overall above 6 kHz and below 1 kHz and in the 2-kHz region for one third of the subjects. Neither individual differences in emission amplitudes nor the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions had a significant influence on the amount of amplitude variability within ears. Variability was not influenced by the length of time between measurements from 1 to 6 weeks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  The Clinical Utility of Distortion‐Product Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[2]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[3]  A. M. Brown,et al.  The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R. Probst,et al.  Repeatability of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[5]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  E. Löhle,et al.  Zur klinischen Anwendung Click-Evozierter Otoakustischer Emissionen an der Freiburger HNO-Klinik1, 2, 3 , 1989 .

[7]  R. Hauser,et al.  The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Eberhard Zwicker,et al.  Evaluating Traveling Wave Characteristics in Man by an Active Nonlinear Cochlea Preprocessing Model , 1986 .

[9]  H. Zenner,et al.  Evozierte otoakustische Emissionen zum Hrscreening bei Suglingen , 1990 .

[10]  D T Kemp,et al.  A Guide to the Effective Use of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[11]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  An active process in cochlear mechanics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[14]  R Probst,et al.  Reporting click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emission results with respect to the pure-tone audiogram. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[15]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.