Plastid DNA sequences and oospore characters of some European taxa of Tolypella section Tolypella (Characeae) identify five clusters, including one new cryptic Tolypella taxon from Sardinia, but they do not coincide with current morphological descriptions

In Europe, the genus Tolypella (Characeae) comprises four to eight Tolypella taxa in sections Rothia and Tolypella that have been distinguished by vegetative morphology and gametangial characters such as antheridial size and oospore wall ornamentation. However, morphological differentiation is difficult in some cases due to overlapping and variable vegetative features, which in many cases are difficult to observe clearly. To clarify the taxonomic status of the five European taxa of Tolypella in section Tolypella, sequence data of the plastid genes atpB, rbcL and psbC for Tolypella glomerata (Desv.) Leonh., Tolypella hispanica Allen, Tolypella nidifica (O.F. Müll.) A. Braun, Tolypella normaniana (Nordst.) Nordst. and Tolypella salina Cor. were combined with data on oospore morphology, including oospore wall ornamentation. Gene sequence data identified five distinct clusters, but they were not consistent with the morphologically identified five taxa. T. glomerata consisted of some of the samples morphologically identified as T. glomerata and seven samples of T. normaniana, while the remaining T. glomerata samples clustered with specimens of unclear affiliation (Tolypella sp.). We identified two clusters of T. hispanica within the European material: cluster T. hispanica I consisted of samples from various locations, whereas the second cluster (T. hispanica II) consisted of samples of T. hispanica from Sardinia Island. The remaining cluster consisted of all the specimens that had been determined as T. salina or T. nidifica in addition to two specimens of T. normaniana. Oospore morphology was most clearly distinguishable for T. glomerata. Oospore characteristics for all other taxa were not as informative but showed some geographical and/or environmentally influenced differences, especially for T. nidifica and T. salina. Our results suggest the need to further check the different taxonomy of Tolypella sect. Tolypella in which specimens normally identified as T. glomerata might be two different taxa, T. glomerata and an unidentified taxon; T. nidifica and T. salina are not separate taxa; T. normaniana is a diminutive variant of two different Tolypella taxa; and T. hispanica comprises two different taxa, one from the Mediterranean island Sardinia.

[1]  Sara Calero,et al.  A quantitative method to analyse the sexual development of charophytes (Charophyceae): a baseline for phenological studies , 2022, Phycologia.

[2]  T. Pröschold,et al.  Unexpected cryptic species among streptophyte algae most distant to land plants , 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[3]  K. G. Karol,et al.  Global high-throughput genotyping of organellar genomes reveals insights into the origin and spread of invasive starry stonewort (Nitellopsis obtusa) , 2021, Biological Invasions.

[4]  R. Becker The Characeae (Charales, Charophyceae) of Sardinia (Italy): habitats, distribution and conservation , 2019, Webbia.

[5]  H. Verbruggen,et al.  Widely distributed red algae often represent hidden introductions, complexes of cryptic species or species with strong phylogeographic structure , 2018, Journal of phycology.

[6]  C. Delwiche,et al.  The Chara Genome: Secondary Complexity and Implications for Plant Terrestrialization , 2018, Cell.

[7]  L. H. Liow,et al.  Cryptic Species - More Than Terminological Chaos: A Reply to Heethoff. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  H. Schubert,et al.  Viability assessment and estimation of the germination potential of charophyte oospores: testing for site and species specificity , 2018 .

[9]  R. McCourt,et al.  Phylogenetic congruence of ribosomal operon and plastid gene sequences for the Characeae with an emphasis on Tolypella (Characeae, Charophyceae) , 2017 .

[10]  B. Foucault Guide des Characées de France méditerranéenne , 2016 .

[11]  S. Schneider,et al.  Species differentiation in the genus Chara (Charophyceae): considerable phenotypic plasticity occurs within homogenous genetic groups , 2016 .

[12]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. , 2016, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  H. Riahi,et al.  Genetic and morphological diversity in Chara vulgaris L. (Characeae) , 2016 .

[14]  David Bryant,et al.  popart: full‐feature software for haplotype network construction , 2015 .

[15]  R. McCourt,et al.  Oospore dimensions and morphology in North American Tolypella (Charophyceae, Charophyta) , 2015, Journal of phycology.

[16]  S. Schneider,et al.  DNA barcoding the genus Chara: molecular evidence recovers fewer taxa than the classical morphological approach , 2015, Journal of phycology.

[17]  H. Schubert,et al.  Morphometry of Chara aspera, C. canescens, C. baltica var. baltica, C. baltica var. liljebladii and C. intermedia oospores: Local variation versus taxonomic differences , 2015 .

[18]  Adriana García,et al.  Gyrogonites and oospores, complementary viewpoints to improve the study of the charophytes (Charales) , 2015 .

[19]  R. McCourt,et al.  Phylogeny of North American Tolypella (Charophyceae, Charophyta) based on plastid DNA sequences with a description of Tolypella ramosissima sp. nov. , 2014, Journal of phycology.

[20]  Santos María Cirujano Bracamonte,et al.  The genus Tolypella (A. Braun) A. Braun in the Iberian Peninsula , 2013 .

[21]  Jean-Luc le Bail,et al.  Tolypella salina R. Cor. on the French Atlantic coast: biology and ecology , 2013 .

[22]  F. Leliaert,et al.  Extensive cryptic species diversity and fine-scale endemism in the marine red alga Portieria in the Philippines , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  H. Kawai,et al.  Mesospora elongata sp. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae), a new crustose brown algal species from the Indo-Pacific region , 2013 .

[24]  A. Langangen,et al.  Oospore Wall Ornamentation in the Genus Tolypella (Charales, Charophyceae) , 2012, Journal of phycology.

[25]  K. Zuse,et al.  GeneticStructureofSympatric Sexually and Parthenogenetically Reproducing Population of Characanescens (Charophyta) , 2011 .

[26]  H. Schubert,et al.  Genetic characterisation of sexually and parthenogenetically reproductive populations of Chara canescens (Charophyceae) using AFLP, rbcL, and SNP markers , 2009 .

[27]  David J. Lohman,et al.  Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[29]  C. Delwiche,et al.  MOLECULAR AND MORPHOLOGICAL DATA IDENTIFY A CRYPTIC SPECIES COMPLEX IN ENDOPHYTIC MEMBERS OF THE GENUS COLEOCHAETE BRÉB. (CHAROPHYTA: COLEOCHAETACEAE) 1 , 2002 .

[30]  K. Crandall,et al.  The Effect of Recombination on the Accuracy of Phylogeny Estimation , 2002, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[31]  S. Ray,et al.  Oospore dimensions and wall ornamentation patterns in Swedish charophytes , 2001 .

[32]  V. W. Proctor,et al.  Phylogeny and Biogeography of Chara (Charophyta) Inferred from 18S rDNA Sequences , 1999 .

[33]  T. A. Hall,et al.  BIOEDIT: A USER-FRIENDLY BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT EDITOR AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR WINDOWS 95/98/ NT , 1999 .

[34]  M. Casanova,et al.  Monophyly of Genera and Species of Characeae based on rbcL Sequences, with Special Reference to Australian and European Lychnothamnus barbatus (Characeae: Charophyceae) , 1999 .

[35]  H. Bandelt,et al.  Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[36]  A. Langangen Tolypella normaniana Nordstedt, a little known charophyte from Northern Norway , 1994 .

[37]  P. Grillas,et al.  The effect of salinity on the reproduction of coastal submerged macrophytes in experimental communities , 1993 .

[38]  M. Casanova An SEM study of developmental variation in oospore wall ornamentation of three Nitella species (Charophyta) in Australia , 1991 .

[39]  G. Kirst,et al.  Vacuolar sap composition during sexual reproduction and salinity stress in Charophytes , 1991 .

[40]  V. W. Proctor HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF CHARA (CHAROPHYTA): AN APPRAISAL OF THE BRAUN‐WOOD CLASSIFICATION PLUS A FALSIFIABLE ALTERNATIVE FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION 1 , 1980 .

[41]  P. Frame,et al.  Comparative Anatomy of Charophyta: I. Oogonia and Oospores of Tolypella- with Special Reference to the Sterile Oogonial Cell , 1974 .

[42]  M. Guerlesquin Recherches caryotypiques et cytotaxinomiques chez les Charophycées d'Europe occidentale et d'Afrique du Nord , 1965 .

[43]  R. Wood NEW COMBINATIONS AND TAXA IN THE REVISION OF CHARACEAE , 1962 .

[44]  R. Corillion Les charophycées de France et d'Europe occidentale , 1959 .

[45]  J. Groves,et al.  The British Charophyta , 2013, Nature.

[46]  M. L. F. Iiy Les Characées de France , 1913 .

[47]  Carl Fredrik Otto Nordstedt De Algis et Characeis , 1889 .

[48]  T. Allen Notes on the American species of Tolypella , 1883 .