Application of preoperative ultrasound features combined with clinical factors in predicting HER2-positive subtype (non-luminal) breast cancer

Background Human epidermal growth factor receptor2+ subtype breast cancer has a high degree of malignancy and a poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to develop a prediction model for the human epidermal growth factor receptor2+ subtype (non-luminal) of breast cancer based on the clinical and ultrasound features related with estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor2. Methods We collected clinical data and reviewed preoperative ultrasound images of enrolled breast cancers from September 2017 to August 2020. We divided the data into in three groups as follows. Group I: estrogen receptor ± , Group II: progesterone receptor ± and Group III: human epidermal growth factor receptor2 ± . Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the clinical and ultrasound features related with biomarkers among these groups. A model to predict human epidermal growth factor receptor2+ subtype was then developed based on the results of multivariate regression analyses, and the efficacy was evaluated using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity. Results The human epidermal growth factor receptor2+ subtype accounted for 138 cases (11.8%) in the training set and 51 cases (10.1%) in the test set. In the multivariate regression analysis, age ≤ 50 years was an independent predictor of progesterone receptor + (p = 0.007), and posterior enhancement was a negative predictor of progesterone receptor + (p = 0.013) in Group II; palpable axillary lymph node, round, irregular shape and calcifications were independent predictors of the positivity for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 in Group III (p = 0.001, p = 0.007, p = 0.010, p < 0.001, respectively). In Group I, shape was the only factor related to estrogen receptor status in the univariate analysis (p < 0.05). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of the model to predict human epidermal growth factor receptor2+ subtype breast cancer was 0.697, 60.14%, 72.46%, 58.49% and 0.725, 72.06%, 64.71%, 72.89% in the training and test sets, respectively. Conclusions Our study established a model to predict the human epidermal growth factor receptor2-positive subtype with moderate performance. And the results demonstrated that clinical and ultrasound features were significantly associated with biomarkers.

[1]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[2]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[3]  F. Lu,et al.  Histological Grade and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers of Breast Cancer: Correlation to Ultrasound Features , 2017, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[4]  Hesahm Najjar,et al.  Age at diagnosis of breast cancer in Arab nations. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[5]  Feng Li,et al.  Correlation of the ultrasound imaging of breast cancer and the expression of molecular biological indexes. , 2017, Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[6]  Sung Hyun Kim,et al.  Correlation of ultrasound findings with histology, tumor grade, and biological markers in breast cancer , 2008, Acta oncologica.

[7]  Yang Wang,et al.  An integrative deep learning framework for classifying molecular subtypes of breast cancer , 2020, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[8]  S. Rashmi,et al.  Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer based on mammography and ultrasound findings , 2018, Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging.

[9]  Y-X Liu,et al.  Correlations between the expression of C-erB-2, CD34 and ER in breast cancer patients and the signs of conventional ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography. , 2018, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[10]  S. Taplin,et al.  Variation in mammographic breast density by race. , 2001, Annals of epidemiology.

[11]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. , 2018, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[12]  Juan Li,et al.  Clinicopathological and Ultrasonic Features of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: A Comparison with Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Negative Breast Cancers. , 2018, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  R. Neve,et al.  The role of overexpressed HER2 in transformation. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  F. Wang,et al.  Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in invasive breast cancer: a 3,198 cases study at National Cancer Center, China , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[15]  S. Radenković,et al.  HER2-positive breast cancer patients: correlation between mammographic and pathological findings. , 2014, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  Karen Gelmon,et al.  Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  W. McGuire,et al.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.

[18]  D. Adler,et al.  Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  E. Pisano,et al.  Assessing the role of ultrasound in predicting the biological behavior of breast cancer. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  C. Perou,et al.  Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013 , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  Ying Wang,et al.  Identifying ultrasound and clinical features of breast cancer molecular subtypes by ensemble decision , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[22]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2020 , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[23]  Ultrasound utility for predicting biological behavior of invasive ductal breast cancers. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[24]  A. Derossis,et al.  Is Breast Cancer the Same Disease in Asian and Western Countries? , 2010, World Journal of Surgery.

[25]  H. Jing,et al.  Identification of a correlation between the sonographic appearance and molecular subtype of invasive breast cancer: A review of 311 cases. , 2019, Clinical imaging.

[26]  Brian J Burkett,et al.  A Review of Supplemental Screening Ultrasound for Breast Cancer: Certain Populations of Women with Dense Breast Tissue May Benefit. , 2016, Academic radiology.

[27]  C. Osborne,et al.  Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  S. Zackrisson,et al.  Mammographic tumour appearance is related to clinicopathological factors and surrogate molecular breast cancer subtype , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Y. Yarden,et al.  The basic biology of HER2. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[31]  X. Cui,et al.  Deep learning with convolutional neural network in the assessment of breast cancer molecular subtypes based on US images: a multicenter retrospective study , 2020, European Radiology.