A Classroom-Based Intervention to Reduce Disruptive Behaviors

ABSTRACT The present study investigated the effectiveness of an intervention comprising posted classroom rules, token economy, response cost, and mystery motivators in reducing disruptive classroom behavior. Participants were three male second grade students identified as having oppositional defiant disorder. To serve as an additional control, a class composite was formed using five male classmates whose behavior was judged appropriate. The study employed a multiple baseline across subjects design. Results showed an immediate and pronounced decrease in disruptive behaviors for all three students. Furthermore, their rates of disruptive behaviors were consistently below that of the class composite control. This decrease in inappropriate classroom behavior continued during follow-up. The teacher reported that the intervention was relatively easy to implement, and together with its effectiveness in reducing disruptive behaviors, functioned to reinforce her willingness to incorporate the intervention into daily instructional practice.

[1]  T. Kehle,et al.  A packaged intervention to reduce disruptive behaviors in general education students , 2000 .

[2]  T. Kehle,et al.  Augmented Self-Modeling as a Treatment for Children with Selective Mutism , 1998 .

[3]  T. Kehle,et al.  Self-modeling as an intervention for stuttering. , 1996 .

[4]  Angela M. Waguespack,et al.  MYSTERY MOTIVATOR: AN EFFECTIVE AND TIME EFFICIENT INTERVENTION , 1994 .

[5]  Robert B. Rutherford,et al.  Media Review: The Tough Kid Book: Practical Classroom Management Strategies , 1993 .

[6]  R. Zabel,et al.  Effective Teachers of Students with Behavioral Disorders: Are Generic Teaching Skills Enough? , 1991 .

[7]  J. Conoley,et al.  Reconceptualizing school psychology from a service delivery perspective: Implications for practice, training, and research , 1990 .

[8]  Mark R. Shinn,et al.  Antisocial Behavior in School Settings: Initial Differences in an at Risk and Normal Population , 1987 .

[9]  M. Rosenberg.  Maximizing the Effectiveness of Structured Classroom Management Programs: Implementing Rule-Review Procedures with Disruptive and Distractible Students , 1986 .

[10]  W. Jenson,et al.  Precision commands and the «Sure I Will» program: a quick and efficient compliance training sequence , 1984 .

[11]  J. Hilton,et al.  Acceptability of Time Out from Reinforcement Procedures for Disruptive Child Behavior: A Further Analysis. , 1983 .

[12]  B. Martens,et al.  Assessing the acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms , 1983 .

[13]  S. Forman,et al.  Variables related to the effectiveness of response cost , 1982 .

[14]  J. Witt,et al.  The response cost lottery: A time efficient and effective classroom intervention , 1982 .

[15]  P. Karoly,et al.  Self-management in the classroom: Self-imposed response cost versus self-reward , 1978 .

[16]  D. P. Hartmann,et al.  Having your cake and eating it too: A note on some apparent contradictions between therapeutic achievements and design requirements in N=1 studies , 1973 .

[17]  J. McNamara.  Teacher and students as sources for behavior modification in the classroom , 1971 .

[18]  K. O’leary,et al.  The Effects of Loud and Soft Reprimands on the Behavior of Disruptive Students , 1970, Exceptional children.