Deinstitutionalising the Amateur Ethic: An Empirical Examination of Change in a Rugby Union Football Club

In 1996/97, the first season of openly professional rugby union was played in England. For many of the clubs which opted to become involved in the professional game, this was the end of an era. In some cases, over 100 years of institutionalised amateur practice was brought to an end, and professionalism became the dominant mode of operation in these organisations. In order for those clubs which chose to professionalise to operate effectively, the values and related organisational structures which were the very essence of amateurism, had to be deinstitutionalised. Deinstitutionalisation is the erosion or discontinuity of organisational activities and practices, which through the force of habit, tradition, or history, have come to be accepted as legitimate. This paper provides a case study analysis of the process of deinstitutionalisation as it occurred in one Premiership rugby union club. Using data collected through a series of semi-structured interviews conducted with both the adherents of amateurism and the proponents of the new professional organisational structure, this paper identifies some of the forces that contribute to deinstitutionalisation. Following Oliver's (1992) theoretical lead, we empirically show how political, functional, and social pressures contributed to the process of deinstitutionalisation, and how these are mediated by inertial and entropic organisational forces. We also extend Oliver's analysis by showing the way in which the manipulation of organisational symbols can play a role in the dynamics of deinstitutionalisation.

[1]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[2]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  Toward an understanding of the role of agency and choice in the changing structure of Canada's national sport organizations. , 1995 .

[3]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[4]  L. Zucker Institutional patterns and organizations : culture and environment , 1989 .

[5]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[6]  Paul DiMaggio Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[7]  C. Oliver The Influence of Institutional and Task Environment Relationships on Organizational Performance: The Canadian Construction Industry , 1997 .

[8]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[9]  J. Bartunek Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order , 1984 .

[10]  Pamela S. Tolbert Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education. , 1985 .

[11]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  Organizations: Theory and Design , 1991 .

[12]  Philip Selznick Leadership in administration , 1957 .

[13]  C. Oliver The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization , 1992 .

[14]  Anat Rafaeli,et al.  Navigating By Attire: The Use Of Dress By Female Administrative Employees , 1997 .

[15]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL SYMBOLISM AND IDEOLOGY , 1991 .

[16]  W. Powell Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis , 1991 .

[17]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change , 1996 .

[18]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[20]  Ed Clark,et al.  Transforming Former State Enterprises in the Czech Republic , 1995 .

[21]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[22]  W. Richard Scott Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems , 1981 .