Resilience as a framework for urbanism and recovery

Theories of recovery planning and urban design share a common interest in providing for the health and safety of urban communities. However, the requirements of safe refuge and recovery after a disturbance, such as an earthquake, are sometimes at odds with theories of urbanism. This paper proposes the concept of resilience and its interdependent attributes as a way of aligning these theories. It tests the concept through a focus on two case studies, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and the Chile earthquake of 2010. The key to the successful integration of recovery planning and urban design lies in a shift of thinking that sees resilience as a framework for the design of urban space so that it can not only contribute significantly to the quality of everyday urban life but also can be adapted as essential life support and an agent of recovery in the event of a disaster.

[1]  Simon Sadler,et al.  Archigram: Architecture without Architecture , 2005 .

[2]  M. Batty Polynucleated Urban Landscapes , 2001 .

[3]  J. Oliver,et al.  City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[4]  A. O. Altun,et al.  THE RESILIENT CITY , 2012 .

[5]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems , 2004 .

[6]  E. Andersson Urban Landscapes and Sustainable Cities , 2006 .

[7]  Anne Vernez Moudon Built for Change: Neighborhood Architecture in San Francisco , 1986 .

[8]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[9]  A. Moudon Urban Morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field , 2022, Urban Morphology.

[10]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[11]  S. Pickett,et al.  Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms , 2004 .

[12]  William M. Rohe,et al.  Social capital and neighborhood stability: An empirical investigation , 1998 .

[13]  P. Bolund,et al.  Ecosystem services in urban areas , 1999 .

[14]  Ana Paula Baltazar,et al.  Towards a virtual architecture: pushing cybernetics from government to anarchy , 2007, Kybernetes.

[15]  Donald E. Geis,et al.  By Design: The Disaster Resistant and Quality-of-Life Community , 2000 .

[16]  D. Arsenault Critical Thinking : Moving from Infrastructure Protection to Infrastructure Resilience , 2007 .

[17]  Nataly Gattegno,et al.  Ecological Urbanism , 2011 .

[18]  R. Kloosterman,et al.  The Polycentric Urban Region: Towards a Research Agenda , 2001 .

[19]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[20]  David R. Godschalk,et al.  Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities , 2003 .

[21]  P. Healey Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[22]  Gale Fulton,et al.  The Landscape Urbanism Reader , 2008 .

[23]  Sanford Kwinter The hammer and the song , 1998 .

[24]  Lawrence J. Vale The Resilient City , 2007 .

[25]  Robert E. Lang,et al.  What is social capital and why is it important to public policy , 1998 .

[26]  L. Comfort Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response , 1999 .

[27]  Rem Koolhaas,et al.  Rem Koolhaas: Conversations with Students , 1997 .

[28]  Christopher McDonald The Promise of Destruction , 2004 .

[29]  James L. Fridley,et al.  Design principles for ecological engineering , 2001 .

[30]  Patrick Geddes An Analysis of the Principles of Economics. , 1884 .

[31]  Minxin Pei,et al.  "Creeping Democratization" in China , 1995 .

[32]  R. Putnam Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[33]  Lawrence J. Vale,et al.  The resilient city : how modern cities recover from disaster , 2005 .

[34]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services , 2007 .

[35]  Sara E. Wermiel Bracing for Disaster: Earthquake-Resistant Architecture and Engineering in San Francisco, 1838–1933 (review) , 2007 .

[36]  J. Onyx,et al.  Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities , 2000 .

[37]  Kathleen J. Tierney,et al.  Social Aspects Of The Northridge Earthquake , 1995 .