Biologic markers determine both the risk and the timing of recurrence in breast cancer

Breast cancer has a long natural history. Established and emerging biologic markers address overall risk but not necessarily timing of recurrence. 346 adjuvant naïve breast cancer cases from Guy’s Hospital with 23 years minimum follow-up and archival blocks were recut and reassessed for hormone-receptors (HR), HER2-receptor and grade. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was analyzed by recursive partitioning. To validate insights from this analysis, gene-signatures (proliferative and HR-negative) were evaluated for their ability to predict early versus late metastatic risk in 683 node-negative, adjuvant naïve breast cancers annotated with expression microarray data. Risk partitioning showed that adjuvant naïve node-negative outcome risk was primarily partitioned by tumor receptor status and grade but not tumor size. HR-positive and HER2-negative (HRpos) risk was partitioned by tumor grade; low grade cases have very low early risk but a 20% fall-off in DSS 10 or more years after diagnosis. Higher grade HRpos cases have risk over >20 years. Triple-negative (Tneg) and HER2-positive (HER2pos) cases DSS events occurred primarily within the first 5 years. Among node-positive cases, only low grade conferred late risk, suggesting that proliferative gene signatures that identify proliferation would be important for predicting early but not late recurrence. Using pooled data from four publicly available data sets for node-negative tumors annotated with gene expression and outcome data, we evaluated four prognostic gene signatures: two proliferation-based and two immune function-based. Tumor proliferative capacity predicted early but not late metastatic risk for HRpos cases. The immune function or HRneg specific signatures predicted only early metastatic risk in Tneg and HER2pos cases. Breast cancer prognostic signatures need to inform both risk and timing of metastatic events and may best be applied within subsets. Current signatures predict for outcome risk within 5 years of diagnosis. Predictors of late risk for HR positive disease are needed.

[1]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[2]  P. Hall,et al.  An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  A robust classifier of high predictive value to identify good prognosis patients in ER-negative breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[4]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  W. Olszewski,et al.  HER2 status in breast cancer determined by IHC and FISH: comparison of the results. , 2004, Polish journal of pathology : official journal of the Polish Society of Pathologists.

[6]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[7]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[8]  S. Crossing,et al.  Communicating prognosis in early breast cancer: do women understand the language used? , 2000, The Medical journal of Australia.

[9]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[10]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  J. Bergh,et al.  Strong Time Dependence of the 76-Gene Prognostic Signature for Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients in the TRANSBIG Multicenter Independent Validation Series , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  Christos Hatzis,et al.  Commercialized multigene predictors of clinical outcome for breast cancer. , 2008, The oncologist.

[13]  Gianluca Bontempi,et al.  Biological Processes Associated with Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Depend on the Molecular Subtypes , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Risk estimation of distant metastasis in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients using an RT-PCR based prognostic expression signature , 2008, BMC Cancer.

[15]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[16]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Gray,et al.  Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer after primary therapy. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Andy J. Minn,et al.  Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung , 2005, Nature.

[20]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Melania Pintilie,et al.  Analysing and interpreting competing risk data , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  B. Asselain,et al.  Prognostic value of steroid receptors after long-term follow-up of 2257 operable breast cancers. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  E. Perez,et al.  Molecularly targeted therapies for breast cancer. , 2005, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[24]  Karen A Gelmon,et al.  Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Y Wang,et al.  Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials , 2005, The Lancet.

[26]  A. Nobel,et al.  The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[27]  Samuel Leung,et al.  Basal-Like Breast Cancer Defined by Five Biomarkers Has Superior Prognostic Value than Triple-Negative Phenotype , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  J. Thigpen Iniparib plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2011 .

[29]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  Y. Fisher,et al.  Comparison of Results , 1995 .

[31]  J. Foekens,et al.  Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer , 2005, The Lancet.

[32]  Lajos Pusztai,et al.  Gene expression profiling of breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[33]  L. Esserman,et al.  A multigene predictor of metastatic outcome in early stage hormone receptor-negative and triple-negative breast cancer , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[34]  Jason I. Herschkowitz,et al.  Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[35]  P. Butow,et al.  Women’s preferences for discussion of prognosis in early breast cancer , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[36]  L. V. van't Veer,et al.  Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[37]  E. Perez,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Letrozole in Postmenopausal Women after Five Years of Tamoxifen Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer , 2003 .

[38]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of prognostic signatures reveals the high predictive capacity of the Proliferation, Immune response and RNA splicing modules in breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[39]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.